Literature DB >> 2364739

Infant chimpanzees spontaneously perceive both concrete and abstract same/different relations.

D L Oden1, R K Thompson, D Premack.   

Abstract

We used a familiarization-novelty procedure to determine whether 4 infant chimpanzees spontaneously perceive the sameness of and the difference between both concrete objects and relations between objects. In Experiment 1, a single object was presented on the Familiarization Trial 1 and the animal's looking time recorded. On the Test Trial 2, an object was presented that was either identical to or different from that shown on Trial 1. Looking times on Test Trial 2 were less when the same item had been presented on the preceding familiarization trial. Novel items on Trial 2 were attended to longer, indicating that the infant chimpanzees perceived concrete objects were either the same or different. In Experiment 2, a single pair of objects was presented on the Familiarization Trial 1, and handling time was measured. The objects in a pair were either the same or different (e.g., AA vs. CD). On the Test Trial 2, a new object pair (e.g., BB vs. EF) was presented that instantiated either the relation shown on Trial 1 or the alternative relation. Handling time on Trial 2 was influenced by the relation instantiated on Trial 1. Handling times on Test Trial 2 were less when the identical relation had been presented on the preceding familiarization trial. Novel relations on Trial 2 were attended to relatively longer. This result indicates that infant chimpanzees perceive similarities and differences between abstract relations as well as between concrete objects. That is to say, they perceived relations between relations in Experiment 2. Despite this ability to perceive both concrete and abstract "same/different" relations, the same chimpanzees subsequently failed to use the latter knowledge in a matching-to-sample task in Experiment 3. Although they successfully matched single objects, they were unable to match object pairs instantiating the same relation (e.g., if AA then match BB; if CD then match EF). These results contradict claims that failure to learn an instrumental discrimination involving abstract relations reflects an inability to detect such relations. In every species there may be a disparity between the ability to perceive spontaneously a property of the world and the ability to use the concept instrumentally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2364739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  10 in total

1.  Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Analogical reasoning and the differential outcome effect: transitory bridging of the conceptual gap for rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Timothy M Flemming; Roger K R Thompson; Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-07

3.  An analysis of visual oddity concept learning in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus).

Authors:  Petra Hille; Guido Dehnhardt; Björn Mauck
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  L A Parr; J T Winslow; W D Hopkins; F B de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Paper wasps form abstract concept of 'same and different'.

Authors:  Chloe Weise; Christian Cely Ortiz; Elizabeth A Tibbetts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 6.  Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Allison Scagel
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition.

Authors:  Daniel B M Haun; Christian J Rapold; Josep Call; Gabriele Janzen; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Analogical reasoning in baboons (Papio papio): flexible reencoding of the source relation depending on the target relation.

Authors:  Joël Fagot; Anaïs Maugard
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Does language about similarity play a role in fostering similarity comparison in children?

Authors:  Seyda Ozçalişkan; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Dedre Gentner; Carolyn Mylander
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-06-12

10.  Evaluating the progress of deep learning for visual relational concepts.

Authors:  Sebastian Stabinger; David Peer; Justus Piater; Antonio Rodríguez-Sánchez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.