Literature DB >> 23645849

Does empirical Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) therapy result in false-negative CDI diagnostic test results?

Venkata C K Sunkesula1, Sirisha Kundrapu, Christine Muganda, Ajay K Sethi, Curtis J Donskey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) often receive empirical therapy prior to collection of stool specimens for diagnostic testing. The likelihood that such empirical therapy might result in false-negative CDI test results is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of CDI patients to determine the time to conversion of CDI test results, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for toxin B genes, glutamate dehydrogenase, and toxigenic culture, from positive to negative during CDI therapy. We evaluated the frequency of and risk factors for persistence of positive CDI tests. For patients receiving empirical therapy, we assessed the frequency of conversion of positive CDI test results at the time of the test order to negative by the time clinical staff collected stool specimens for testing.
RESULTS: For 51 CDI patients, PCR, glutamate dehydrogenase, and toxigenic culture results converted to negative at similar rates. For PCR, 14%, 35%, and 45% of positive CDI tests converted to negative after 1, 2, and 3 days of treatment, respectively. Increased age and infection with North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis strains were associated with persistent positive PCR results. For CDI patients diagnosed at the time of the test order, conversion to negative PCR results by the time clinical stool specimens were collected occurred in 4 of 9 (44%) patients who were prescribed empirical CDI therapy versus 0 of 23 (0%) who were not (P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Empirical treatment for suspected CDI cases may result in false-negative PCR results if there are delays in stool specimen collection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDI; Clostridium difficile; diagnosis; empirical treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23645849     DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  14 in total

1.  Sensitive and selective culture medium for detection of environmental Clostridium difficile isolates without requirement for anaerobic culture conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cadnum; Kelly N Hurless; Abhishek Deshpande; Michelle M Nerandzic; Sirisha Kundrapu; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Christopher R Polage; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clinical characteristics of patients who test positive for Clostridium difficile by repeat PCR.

Authors:  Daniel A Green; Brie Stotler; Dana Jackman; Susan Whittier; Phyllis Della-Latta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Physical, Laboratory, Radiographic, and Endoscopic Workup for Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Authors:  Samantha J Baker; Daniel I Chu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

5.  Dual Reporting of Clostridioides difficile PCR and Predicted Toxin Result Based on PCR Cycle Threshold Reduces Treatment of Toxin-Negative Patients without Increases in Adverse Outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew M Hitchcock; Marisa Holubar; Catherine A Hogan; Lucy S Tompkins; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Is Follow-Up Testing with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal Multiplex PCR Panel Necessary?

Authors:  Sholhui Park; Matthew M Hitchcock; Carlos A Gomez; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Scott Curry
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 8.  Managing Clostridium difficile in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Authors:  Jana G Hashash; David G Binion
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014

9.  Indeterminate tcdB using a Clostridium difficile PCR assay: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jerome A Leis; Wayne L Gold; John Ng; Zahir Hirji; Dylan R Pillai; George Broukhanski; Paula Raggiunti; Susy Hota; Allison McGeer; Susan M Poutanen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.

Authors:  Yanal M Murad; Justo Perez; Gustavo Ybazeta; Sarah Mavin; Sebastien Lefebvre; J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; Francisco Diaz-Mitoma; Reza Nokhbeh
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.