Literature DB >> 23645547

Findings from the Community Health Intervention Program in South Carolina: implications for reducing cancer-related health disparities.

James Lyndon McCracken1, Daniela B Friedman, Heather M Brandt, Swann Arp Adams, Sudha Xirasagar, John R Ureda, Rachel M Mayo, Kimberly Comer, Miriam Evans, Delores Fedrick, Jacqueline Talley, Madeline Broderick, James R Hebert.   

Abstract

The South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (SC-CPCRN) implemented the Community Health Intervention Program (CHIP) mini-grants initiative to address cancer-related health disparities and reduce the cancer burden among high-risk populations across the state. The mini-grants project implemented evidence-based health interventions tailored to the specific needs of each community. This study aims to support the SC-CPCRN's goals of moving toward greater dissemination and implementation of evidence-based programs in the community to improve public health, prevent disease, and reduce the cancer burden. Three community-based organizations were awarded $10,000 each to implement one of the National Cancer Institute's evidence-based interventions. Each group had 12 months to complete their project. SC-CPCRN investigators and staff provided guidance, oversight, and technical assistance for each project. Grantees provided regular updates and reports to their SC-CPCRN liaisons to capture vital evaluation information. The intended CHIP mini-grant target population reach was projected to be up to 880 participants combined. Actual combined reach of the three projects reported upon completion totaled 1,072 individuals. The majority of CHIP participants were African-American females. Participants ranged in age from 19 to 81 years. Evaluation results showed an increase in physical activity, dietary improvements, and screening participation. The success of the initiative was the result of a strong community-university partnership built on trust. Active two-way communication and an honest open dialogue created an atmosphere for collaboration. Communities were highly motivated. All team members shared a common goal of reducing cancer-related health disparities and building greater public health capacity across the state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23645547      PMCID: PMC3755099          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0479-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  17 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Dietary change through African American churches: baseline results and program description of the eat for life trial.

Authors:  K Resnicow; D C Wallace; A Jackson; A Digirolamo; E Odom; T Wang; W N Dudley; M Davis; D Mitchell; T Baranowski
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward Lichtenstein; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Replication and dissemination of a cancer education model for African American women.

Authors:  Deborah O Erwin; Jennifer Ivory; Charlie Stayton; Mattye Willis; Lina Jandorf; Hayley Thompson; Sharita Womack; Thelma C Hurd
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  If you build it, they will come: lessons from developing walking trails in rural Missouri.

Authors:  Imogene Wiggs; Ross C Brownson; Elizabeth A Baker
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2006-06-30

6.  The making of an interdisciplinary partnership: the case of the Chicago Food System Collaborative.

Authors:  Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar; Maureen Hellwig; Joanne Kouba; Ladonna Redmond; Louise Martinez; Daniel Block; Claire Kohrman; William Peterman
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2006-09

Review 7.  Meeting the challenges of cancer prevention and control in South Carolina: focusing on seven cancer sites, engaging partners.

Authors:  James R Hebert; Keith Elder; John R Ureda
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08

Review 8.  Health effects of phytoestrogens.

Authors:  Francesco Branca; Stefano Lorenzetti
Journal:  Forum Nutr       Date:  2005

9.  Mapping cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios to illustrate racial and sex disparities in a high-risk population.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Virginie G Daguise; Deborah M Hurley; Rebecca C Wilkerson; Catishia M Mosley; Swann A Adams; Robin Puett; James B Burch; Susan E Steck; Susan W Bolick-Aldrich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A community translational research pilot grants program to facilitate community--academic partnerships: lessons from Colorado's clinical translational science awards.

Authors:  Deborah S Main; Maret C Felzien; David J Magid; B Ned Calonge; Ruth A O'Brien; Allison Kempe; Kathryn Nearing
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012
View more
  19 in total

1.  The cancer prevention and control research network: An interactive systems approach to advancing cancer control implementation research and practice.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Cathy L Melvin; Jennifer Leeman; Kurt M Ribisl; Jennifer D Allen; Michelle C Kegler; Roshan Bastani; Marcia G Ory; Betsy C Risendal; Peggy A Hannon; Matthew W Kreuter; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Patient and provider perspectives on the relationship between multiple morbidity management and disease prevention.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Shoshana H Bardach; Steven T Fleming
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-09-17

3.  Innovative and Community-Guided Evaluation and Dissemination of a Prostate Cancer Education Program for African-American Men and Women.

Authors:  Dawnyea D Jackson; Otis L Owens; Daniela B Friedman; Ragan Dubose-Morris
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Enhancing capacity among faith-based organizations to implement evidence-based cancer control programs: a community-engaged approach.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Jennifer D Allen; Hosffman Ospino; Laura S Tom; Rosalyn Negrón; Richard Buesa; Maria Idalí Torres
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  On Some Practical Considerations Regarding Community-Based Participatory Research for Addressing Cancer Health Disparities.

Authors:  Brad Lian; Connie L Kohler; Levi Ross
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Accelerating Research Collaborations Between Academia and Federally Qualified Health Centers: Suggestions Shaped by History.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Swann Arp Adams; John R Ureda; Vicki M Young; Heather M Brandt; Sue P Heiney; Jessica S Seel; Daniela B Friedman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Rise Up, Get Tested, and Live: an Arts-Based Colorectal Cancer Educational Program in a Faith-Based Setting.

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Swann Arp Adams; Heather M Brandt; Sue P Heiney; James R Hébert; John R Ureda; Jessica S Seel; Courtney S Schrock; Wilhelmenia Mathias; Vivian Clark-Armstead; Reverend Vernette Dees; Reverend Perry Oliver
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Use of Mini-Grant to Disseminate Evidence-Based Interventions for Cancer Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Michelle C Kegler; Michelle L Carvalho; Marcia Ory; Deb Kellstedt; Daniela B Friedman; James Lyndon McCracken; Glenna Dawson; Maria Fernandez
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

9.  Is Availability of Mammography Services at Federally Qualified Health Centers Associated with Breast Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios? An Ecological Analysis.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; Seul Ki Choi; Jan M Eberth; Daniela B Friedman; Mei Po Yip; Reginald D Tucker-Seeley; Lisa T Wigfall; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Community-Based Participatory Research Adds Value to the National Cancer Institute's Research Portfolio.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Kathryn L Braun; Cathy D Meade; Joan Bloom; Erin Kobetz
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.