Literature DB >> 26208105

Is Availability of Mammography Services at Federally Qualified Health Centers Associated with Breast Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios? An Ecological Analysis.

Swann Arp Adams1,2,3, Seul Ki Choi1,4, Jan M Eberth1,2, Daniela B Friedman1,4, Mei Po Yip5, Reginald D Tucker-Seeley6,7, Lisa T Wigfall8, James R Hébert1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mammography is the most effective method to detect breast cancer in its earliest stages, reducing the risk of breast cancer death. We investigated the relationship between accessibility of mammography services at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) of breast cancer in each county in the United States.
METHODS: County-level breast cancer mortality and incidence rates in 2006-2010 were used to estimate MIRs. We compared breast cancer MIRs based on the density and availability of FQHC delivery sites with or without mammography services both in the county and in the neighboring counties.
RESULTS: The relationship between breast cancer MIRs and access to mammography services at FQHCs differed by race and county of residence. Breast cancer MIRs were lower in counties with mammography facilities or FQHC delivery sites than in counties without a mammography facility or FQHC delivery site. This trend was stronger in urban counties (p=0.01) and among whites (p=0.008). Counties with a high density of mammography facilities had lower breast cancer MIRs than other counties, specifically in urban counties (p=0.01) and among whites (p=0.01). Breast cancer MIR for blacks was the lowest in counties having mammography facilities; and was highest in counties without a mammography facility within the county or the neighboring counties (p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Mammography services provided at FQHCs may have a positive impact on breast cancer MIRs. Expansion of services provided at the FQHCs and placement of FQHCs in additional underserved areas might help to reduce cancer disparities in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26208105      PMCID: PMC4808280          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  43 in total

Review 1.  Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification.

Authors:  S Greenland; H Morgenstern
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: impact of health insurance status, ethnicity, and nativity of Latinas.

Authors:  Michael A Rodríguez; Lisa M Ward; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  The role of community health centers in delivering primary care to the underserved: experiences of the uninsured and Medicaid insured.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Gregory D Stevens
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

4.  Integrating community health centers into organized delivery systems can improve access to subspecialty care.

Authors:  Katherine Neuhausen; Kevin Grumbach; Andrew Bazemore; Robert L Phillips
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; John S Luque; Branko Miladinovic; Natalia Vargas; Yasmin Asvat; Richard G Roetzheim; Ambuj Kumar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  The colorectal cancer mortality-to-incidence ratio as an indicator of global cancer screening and care.

Authors:  Vasu Sunkara; James R Hébert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Characteristics of mammography facility locations and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in Chicago.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tarlov; Shannon N Zenk; Richard T Campbell; Richard B Warnecke; Richard Block
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 10.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Adams et al. Respond.

Authors:  Swann A Adams; Suel Ki Choi; Jan M Eberth; Heather M Brandt; Daniela B Friedman; James R Hébert
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Accelerating Research Collaborations Between Academia and Federally Qualified Health Centers: Suggestions Shaped by History.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Swann Arp Adams; John R Ureda; Vicki M Young; Heather M Brandt; Sue P Heiney; Jessica S Seel; Daniela B Friedman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; Catherine L Rohweder; Jennifer Leeman; Daniela B Friedman; Ziya Gizlice; Robin C Vanderpool; Natoshia Askelson; Alicia Best; Susan A Flocke; Karen Glanz; Linda K Ko; Michelle Kegler
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-12

4.  Mortality-to-incidence ratios by US Congressional District: Implications for epidemiologic, dissemination and implementation research, and public health policy.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Whitney E Zahnd; Swann Arp Adams; Daniela B Friedman; Stephanie B Wheeler; James R Hébert
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Mapping of Female Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates to Socioeconomic Factors Cohort: Path Diagram Analysis.

Authors:  Qiongle Peng; Xiaoling Ren
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-01

6.  A Bivariate Mapping Tutorial for Cancer Control Resource Allocation Decisions and Interventions.

Authors:  Claire Biesecker; Whitney E Zahnd; Heather M Brandt; Swann Arp Adams; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.830

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.