Literature DB >> 23645204

Differential blood contamination levels and powder-liquid ratios can affect the compressive strength of calcium phosphate cement (CPC): a study using a transpedicular vertebroplasty model.

Katsuhito Kiyasu1, Ryuichi Takemasa, Masahiko Ikeuchi, Toshikazu Tani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is a potentially useful alternative to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for transpedicular injection into osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Unlike PMMA, CPC is both biocompatible and osteoconductive without producing heat from polymerization, but it has lower compressive strength compared to PMMA. This in vitro model experiment analyzed how different CPC powder-liquid ratios (P/L ratios) and injection methods may minimize blood contamination in the CPC and, thereby its reduction in compressive strength.
METHODS: (1) CPC of different P/L ratios of 4.0, 3.5, and 3.2 was equally mixed with different amounts of freshly obtained human venous blood, producing cylindrically shaped CPC samples. (2) Using a transpedicular vertebroplasty model containing blood in the bottom, CPC pastes of different P/L ratios were injected with the nozzle of an injection gun affixed either to the bottom (Bottom method) or to the top of the container (Top method). All cylindrical CPC samples thus obtained were immersed in simulated body fluid and then underwent compressive strength tests at 3 h-7 days post-immersion.
RESULTS: In CPC equally mixed with blood, lower P/L ratios and a larger amount of blood contamination reduced compressive strength more significantly. Of the two methods of CPC injection, the 'Bottom method' produced significantly greater compressive strength values than the 'Top method'.
CONCLUSIONS: When performing CPC-assisted vertebroplasty, a greater load bearing-support can be obtained by injecting CPC paste of a high P/L ratio of 4.0 into the deepest part of the space inside the vertebral body to minimize blood contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23645204      PMCID: PMC3698333          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2800-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Mechanical augmentation of the vertebral body by calcium phosphate cement injection.

Authors:  M Ikeuchi; H Yamamoto; T Shibata; M Otani
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  On the setting properties of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  P R Meyer; E P Lautenschlager; B K Moore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Biomechanical, histological and histomorphometric analyses of calcium phosphate cement compared to PMMA for vertebral augmentation in a validated animal model.

Authors:  Luis Alvarez Galovich; Antonio Perez-Higueras; Jose R Altonaga; José Manuel Gonzalo Orden; Maria Lluisa Mariñoso Barba; Maria Teresa Carrascal Morillo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.

Authors:  J D Barr; M S Barr; T J Lemley; R M McCann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Vertebroplasty comparing injectable calcium phosphate cement compared with polymethylmethacrylate in a unique canine vertebral body large defect model.

Authors:  Thomas M Turner; Robert M Urban; Kern Singh; Deborah J Hall; Susan M Renner; Tae-Hong Lim; Michael J Tomlinson; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a 2-functional spinal unit vertebral compression fracture model.

Authors:  A Jay Khanna; Samuel Lee; Marta Villarraga; Jonathan Gimbel; Duane Steffey; Jeffrey Schwardt
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Suitability of a calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Thomas R Blattert; Leonie Jestaedt; Arnulf Weckbach
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine.

Authors:  Shinya Nouda; Seiji Tomita; Akihiro Kin; Kunihiko Kawahara; Mitsuo Kinoshita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements.

Authors:  Seiji Tomita; Sean Molloy; Louis E Jasper; Muneaki Abe; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Vertebroplasty Using Calcium Phosphate Cement for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Study of Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of Two Years.

Authors:  Masato Nakano; Norikazu Hirano; Mineyuki Zukawa; Kayo Suzuki; Jinichiro Hirose; Tomoatsu Kimura; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-03-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of polymeric additives on the cohesion and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements.

Authors:  Jie An; Joop G C Wolke; John A Jansen; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Evaluation of the Effect of Selected Physiological Fluid Contaminants on the Mechanical Properties of Selected Medium-Viscosity PMMA Bone Cements.

Authors:  Robert Karpiński; Jakub Szabelski; Przemysław Krakowski; Mariusz Jojczuk; Józef Jonak; Adam Nogalski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.