Literature DB >> 2364491

Starling resistor versus compliance. Which explains the zero-flow pressure of a dynamic arterial pressure-flow relation?

S Magder1.   

Abstract

Arterial pressure at zero flow (Pz = 0) that is higher than venous pressure (Pv) in dynamic pressure-flow relations has been explained by the presence of an arteriolar Starling resistor (SR) mechanism (i.e., vascular waterfall) or the discharge of vascular capacitance. To determine which was predominant, I studied in vivo hind limbs of 18 anesthetized dogs in which femoral arteries were cannulated with in-line electromagnetic flow probes to measure inflow (Qin), Pv was controlled, and collateral flow was eliminated with a tourniquet. Pz = 0 was obtained by turning flow to zero. Three tests were applied: 1) Pv was raised in steps with either constant Qin or constant arterial pressure (Pa) to determine the pressure at which upstream vascular characteristics were affected by a change in Pv, 2) the time to reach Pz = 0 was varied to determine compliance effects, and 3) an equation was developed to determine if experimentally derived parameters could explain Pz = 0 without invoking an SR. With constant Qin and a Pz = 0 of 56.9 +/- 11.7 mm Hg (time to Pz = 0, 3 seconds), Pv could be raised by 9.6 +/- 6.2 to 16.3 +/- 6.0 mm Hg before Pa increased, and with constant Pa, Pv could be raised by 6.8 +/- 7.3 to 14.0 +/- 8.0 mm Hg before Qin decreased. With increasing times to reach Pz = 0, Pz = 0 initially dropped precipitously, but then decreased by only a small amount over the next 5-10 seconds even though arterial pressure was much above Pv. This could be explained by an SR mechanism with a critical pressure of 42.3 +/- 11.4 mm Hg and an arterial compliance of 0.0104 +/- 0.0023 ml.mm Hg-1 (n = 6). There was no value for the compliance that described the results when the arterial outflow pressure was Pv. Thus, this study supports the hypothesis that an SR mechanism is present in the vascular system. It is most likely precapillary, and in the resting limb, it has a value of 40-50 mm Hg. However, Pz = 0 in dynamic pressure-flow studies of less than 4 seconds is also greatly influenced by capacitance effects and the initial Pa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2364491     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.67.1.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  12 in total

1.  The use of a numerical model to simulate the cavo-pulmonary assistance in Fontan circulation: a preliminary verification.

Authors:  Arianna Di Molfetta; Antonio Amodeo; Libera Fresiello; Sergio Filippelli; Mara Pilati; Roberta Iacobelli; Rachele Adorisio; Dionisio Colella; Gianfranco Ferrari
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  Determination of vascular waterfall phenomenon by bedside measurement of mean systemic filling pressure and critical closing pressure in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jacinta J Maas; Rob B de Wilde; Leon P Aarts; Michael R Pinsky; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The mechanical effects of contractions on blood flow to the muscle.

Authors:  R Naamani; S N Hussain; S Magder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

5.  Pulmonary artery wave propagation and reservoir function in conscious man: impact of pulmonary vascular disease, respiration and dynamic stress tests.

Authors:  Junjing Su; Charlotte Manisty; Ulf Simonsen; Luke S Howard; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Hemodilution does not alter the aortic-to-femoral arterial pressure difference in dogs.

Authors:  J Urzua; G Nunez; G Lema; R Canessa; C Sacco
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Cerebral venous collaterals: A new fort for fighting ischemic stroke?

Authors:  Lu-Sha Tong; Zhen-Ni Guo; Yi-Bo Ou; Yan-Nan Yu; Xiao-Cheng Zhang; Jiping Tang; John H Zhang; Min Lou
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Withdrawing intra-aortic balloon pump support paradoxically improves microvascular flow.

Authors:  Luuk D H Munsterman; Paul W G Elbers; Alaattin Ozdemir; Eric P A van Dongen; Mat van Iterson; Can Ince
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Volume and its relationship to cardiac output and venous return.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  The meaning of blood pressure.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.