Literature DB >> 23644811

The effect of obesity on fecal incontinence symptom distress, quality of life, and diagnostic testing measures in women.

David R Ellington1, Michael R Polin, Jeff M Szychowski, Luqin Deng, Holly E Richter.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Weight-loss has been demonstrated to result in an improvement in fecal incontinence (FI) severity; however, there is a paucity of data addressing the differential impact of FI on the quality of life (QOL) and results of diagnostic testing across BMI categories. We wished to evaluate symptom distress, QOL, and diagnostic testing parameters among normal, overweight, and obese women with fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Women undergoing evaluation for FI between 2003 and 2012 were identified. Participants completed validated, symptom-specific distress, impact, and general QOL measures including the Modified Manchester Questionnaire (MMHQ), which includes the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and the mental and physical component summary scores, MCS and PCS, respectively, of the Short Form-12. Anorectal manometry measures were also included. Multivariate regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Participants included 407 women with a mean age ± SD of 56 ± 13. Multivariate analyses revealed no differences in symptom-specific distress and impact as measured by MMHQ, MCS, and PCS across BMI groups; however, obese women had increased resting and squeeze pressures compared with normal and overweight BMI women (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001; p = 0.007 and p = 0.004 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Obese women with FI did not have more general impact and symptom-specific distress and impact on quality of life compared with normal and overweight women. Obese women with FI had higher baseline anal resting and squeeze pressures suggesting a lower threshold to leakage with pressure increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644811      PMCID: PMC3773284          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

Review 1.  The assessment of fecal incontinence in women.

Authors:  P Giordano; S D Wexner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Epidemiology of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Weight loss improves fecal incontinence severity in overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Alayne D Markland; Holly E Richter; Kathryn L Burgio; Deborah L Myers; Alexandra L Hernandez; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Clinical and instrumental evaluation of pelvic floor disorders before and after bariatric surgery in obese women.

Authors:  Dajana Cuicchi; Raffaele Lombardi; Stefano Cariani; Luca Leuratti; Ferdinando Lecce; Bruno Cola
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  The impact of obesity on urinary incontinence symptoms, severity, urodynamic characteristics and quality of life.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Kimberly Kenton; Liyuan Huang; Ingrid Nygaard; Stephen Kraus; Emily Whitcomb; Toby C Chai; Gary Lemack; Larry Sirls; Kimberly J Dandreo; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Robert D Madoff; Susan C Parker; Madhulika G Varma; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain.

Authors:  Xuemei Luo; Mandy Lynn George; Ikey Kakouras; Christopher L Edwards; Ricardo Pietrobon; William Richardson; Lloyd Hey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  The Differential Impact of Flatal Incontinence in Women With Anal Versus Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Ying Tang; Jeff M Szychowski; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Factors influencing BMI classifications of Korean adults.

Authors:  Ae Kyung Chang; Jin Yi Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

4.  Comparison of Anorectal Manometry Testing in Left Lateral and Lithotomy Positions.

Authors:  Priyanka K Kadam-Halani; Avita K Pahwa; Nathanael C Koelper; Lily A Arya; Mary D Sammel; Uduak U Andy
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.913

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.