Literature DB >> 23644729

Emerging role of echocardiographic strain/strain rate imaging and twist in systolic function evaluation and operative procedure in patients with aortic stenosis.

Bin Wang1, Haiyan Chen, Xianhong Shu, Tao Hong, Hao Lai, Chunsheng Wang, Leilei Cheng.   

Abstract

Systolic function of the left ventricle is vital for patients with aortic stenosis. Unfortunately, the most widely used clinical parameter, the left ventricular ejection fraction, is not sensitive enough, especially for patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Echocardiographic strain/strain rate and twist are emerging parameters for left ventricular systolic and diastolic function evaluation. Aortic stenosis could reduce strain/strain rate while magnifying twist. Furthermore, strain/strain rate correlates well with the prognosis of patients with aortic stenosis. Most importantly the circumferential strain, strain rate and twist also play a role in differentiating cardiac compensation or decompensation. In any case, these parameters could normalize after successful surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Regardless of these advantages, clinical evidence is needed to ensure their usefulness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Cardiac systolic function; Strain; Strain rate; Twist

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644729      PMCID: PMC3715177          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  44 in total

1.  Acute improvement in myocardial function assessed by myocardial strain and strain rate after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Noriaki Iwahashi; Satoshi Nakatani; Hideaki Kanzaki; Takuya Hasegawa; Haruhiko Abe; Masafumi Kitakaze
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Alec Vahanian; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen Bax; Eric Butchart; Robert Dion; Gerasimos Filippatos; Frank Flachskampf; Roger Hall; Bernard Iung; Jaroslaw Kasprzak; Patrick Nataf; Pilar Tornos; Lucia Torracca; Arnold Wenink
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  The value of 2D strain imaging during stress testing.

Authors:  Marie Moonen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Dimitrios Zacharakis; Luc Pierard
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.724

4.  Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry.

Authors:  Neil E Moat; Peter Ludman; Mark A de Belder; Ben Bridgewater; Andrew D Cunningham; Christopher P Young; Martyn Thomas; Jan Kovac; Tom Spyt; Philip A MacCarthy; Olaf Wendler; David Hildick-Smith; Simon W Davies; Uday Trivedi; Daniel J Blackman; Richard D Levy; Stephen J D Brecker; Andreas Baumbach; Tim Daniel; Huon Gray; Michael J Mullen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement.

Authors:  Victoria Delgado; Laurens F Tops; Rutger J van Bommel; Frank van der Kley; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Robert J Klautz; Michel I M Versteegh; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Emerging clinical role of strain imaging in echocardiography.

Authors:  Dominic Y Leung; Arnold C T Ng
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 2.975

7.  Sequential changes of longitudinal and radial myocardial deformation indices in the healthy neonate heart.

Authors:  José Luiz Barros Pena; Marconi Gomes da Silva; José Mariano Sales Alves; Vera Maria Cury Salemi; Charles Mady; Aigul Baltabaeva; George R Sutherland
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Alteration in subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial strain in patients with aortic valve stenosis: an early marker of left ventricular dysfunction?

Authors:  Eiichi Hyodo; Kotaro Arai; Agnes Koczo; Yuichi J Shimada; Kohei Fujimoto; Marco R Di Tullio; Shunichi Homma; Linda D Gillam; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 9.  Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation: recent advances and future.

Authors:  Olav F M Sellevold; Fabio Guarracino
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  Recovery of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain after valve replacement in aortic stenosis and relation to natriuretic peptides.

Authors:  Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen; Peter Søgaard; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Henrik Egeblad
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  3 in total

1.  eComment. Role of global longitudinal strain for evaluation of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Sanjeev Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08

2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: association of circumferential myocardial strain and mortality.

Authors:  Tarique Al Musa; Akhlaque Uddin; Peter P Swoboda; Timothy A Fairbairn; Laura E Dobson; Anvesha Singh; Pankaj Garg; Christopher D Steadman; Bara Erhayiem; Ananth Kidambi; David P Ripley; Adam K McDiarmid; Philip Haaf; Daniel J Blackman; Sven Plein; Gerald P McCann; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Cardiac Mechanics in Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease With Normal Ejection Fraction: A Study of Various Valvular Lesion Types.

Authors:  Xijun Zhang; Meihua Zhu; Tao He; Jianjun Yuan; Haohui Zhu; Dennis E Morrisroe; Muhammad Ashraf; David J Sahn
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.