Literature DB >> 22019110

Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry.

Neil E Moat1, Peter Ludman, Mark A de Belder, Ben Bridgewater, Andrew D Cunningham, Christopher P Young, Martyn Thomas, Jan Kovac, Tom Spyt, Philip A MacCarthy, Olaf Wendler, David Hildick-Smith, Simon W Davies, Uday Trivedi, Daniel J Blackman, Richard D Levy, Stephen J D Brecker, Andreas Baumbach, Tim Daniel, Huon Gray, Michael J Mullen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to define the characteristics of a real-world patient population treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), regardless of technology or access route, and to evaluate their clinical outcome over the mid to long term.
BACKGROUND: Although a substantial body of data exists in relation to early clinical outcomes after TAVI, there are few data on outcomes beyond 1 year in any notable number of patients.
METHODS: The U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry was established to report outcomes of all TAVI procedures performed within the United Kingdom. Data were collected prospectively on 870 patients undergoing 877 TAVI procedures up until December 31, 2009. Mortality tracking was achieved in 100% of patients with mortality status reported as of December 2010.
RESULTS: Survival at 30 days was 92.9%, and it was 78.6% and 73.7% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. There was a marked attrition in survival between 30 days and 1 year. In a univariate model, survival was significantly adversely affected by renal dysfunction, the presence of coronary artery disease, and a nontransfemoral approach; whereas left ventricular function (ejection fraction <30%), the presence of moderate/severe aortic regurgitation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remained the only independent predictors of mortality in the multivariate model.
CONCLUSIONS: Midterm to long-term survival after TAVI was encouraging in this high-risk patient population, although a substantial proportion of patients died within the first year. Copyright Â
© 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019110     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  158 in total

Review 1.  Valvular disease in 2011: Breakthrough for intervention?

Authors:  Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Valvular disease: the UK TAVI experience: insights from the 'real world'.

Authors:  Alexandra King
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Preferential short cut or alternative route: the transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Niklas Schofer; Florian Deuschl; Lenard Conradi; Edith Lubos; Johannes Schirmer; Hermann Reichenspurner; Stefan Blankenberg; Hendrik Treede; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comparison of multicenter registries and randomized control trials for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; E Murat Tuzcu; William Stewart; Navkaranbir Singh Bajaj; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-07-10

5.  How to define a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conceptual framework and empirical observations from the placement of aortic transcatheter valve (PARTNER) trial.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus; Yang Lei; Philip Green; Ajay J Kirtane; Samir Kapadia; Vinod H Thourani; Howard C Herrmann; Nirat Beohar; Alan Zajarias; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 6.  Pre-implantation balloon-aortic valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is this still needed?

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Michael Teitelbaum; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comprehensive Review and Present Status.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; Jacob A Misenheimer; Radhakrishnan Ramaraj
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 8.  Will catheter interventions replace surgery for valve abnormalities?

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Matthew J Gillespie
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 9.  Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Willibald Maier; Roberto Corti; Thomas F Lüscher; Rolf Jenni; Felix C Tanner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03

10.  Can we still learn from single center experience after PARTNER?

Authors:  Benoit Daneault; Tamas Z Fulop; Paul Farand
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.