Literature DB >> 23643493

EMG and tibial shock upon the first attempt at barefoot running.

Evan D Olin1, Gregory M Gutierrez.   

Abstract

As a potential means to decrease their risk of injury, many runners are transitioning into barefoot running. Habitually shod runners tend to heel-strike (SHS), landing on their heel first, while barefoot runners tend to mid-foot or toe-strike (BTS), landing flat-footed or on the ball of their foot before bringing down the rest of the foot including the heel. This study compared muscle activity, tibial shock, and knee flexion angle in subjects between shod and barefoot conditions. Eighteen habitually SHS recreational runners ran for 3 separate 7-minute trials, including SHS, barefoot heel-strike (BHS), and BTS conditions. EMG, tibial shock, and knee flexion angle were monitored using bipolar surface electrodes, an accelerometer, and an electrogoniometer, respectively. A one-way MANOVA for repeated measures was conducted and several significant changes were noted between SHS and BTS, including significant increases in average EMG of the medial gastrocnemius (p=.05), average and peak tibial shock (p<.01), and the minimum knee flexion angle (p<.01). Based on our data, the initial change in mechanics may have detrimental effects on the runner. While it has been argued that BTS running may ultimately be less injurious, these data indicate that habitually SHS runners who choose to transition into a BTS technique must undertake the process cautiously.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643493     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  10 in total

1.  Measuring movement symmetry using tibial-mounted accelerometers for people recovering from total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cory L Christiansen; Michael J Bade; Roger J Paxton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running.

Authors:  Jennifer R Yong; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  The Use of Wearable Sensors for Preventing, Assessing, and Informing Recovery from Sport-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ezio Preatoni; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Lucie I Giraud; Amaranta S Orejel Bustos; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Valentina Camomilla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Acute changes in foot strike pattern and cadence affect running parameters associated with tibial stress fractures.

Authors:  Jennifer R Yong; Amy Silder; Kate L Montgomery; Michael Fredericson; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners.

Authors:  Yang Shu; Qichang Mei; Justin Fernandez; Zhiyong Li; Neng Feng; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The risks and benefits of running barefoot or in minimalist shoes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kyle P Perkins; William J Hanney; Carey E Rothschild
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  16 Weeks of Progressive Barefoot Running Training Changes Impact Force and Muscle Activation in Habitual Shod Runners.

Authors:  Ana Paula da Silva Azevedo; Bruno Mezêncio; Alberto Carlos Amadio; Julio Cerca Serrão
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Acute Effects of Gait Interventions on Tibial Loads During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meghan Keast; Jason Bonacci; Aaron Fox
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 11.928

9.  Modelling of Muscle Force Distributions During Barefoot and Shod Running.

Authors:  Jonathan Sinclair; Stephen Atkins; Jim Richards; Hayley Vincent
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 10.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.