Literature DB >> 23642449

The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Mehran Moazen1, Jonathan H Mak, Lee W Etchels, Zhongmin Jin, Ruth K Wilcox, Alison C Jones, Eleftherios Tsiridis.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixation failures are still occurring. The effect of fracture stability and loading on PFF fixation has not been investigated and this is crucial for optimum management of PFF. Models of stable and unstable PPFs were developed and used to quantify the effect of fracture stability and loading in a single locking plate fixation. Stress on the plate was higher in the unstable compared to the stable fixation. In the case of unstable fractures, it is possible for a single locking plate fixation to provide the required mechanical environment for callus formation without significant risk of plate fracture, provided partial weight bearing is followed. In cases where partial weight bearing is unlikely, additional biological fixation could be considered.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  finite element method; fracture movement; stiffness; strain; weight bearing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23642449     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  [Treatment of periprosthetic fractures : new concepts in operative treatment].

Authors:  D Wähnert; B Schliemann; M J Raschke; C Kösters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Biomechanical features of six design of the delta external fixator for treating Pilon fracture: a finite element study.

Authors:  Muhammad Hanif Ramlee; Mohd Ayub Sulong; Evelyn Garcia-Nieto; Daniel Angure Penaranda; Antonio Ros Felip; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The impact of stem fixation method on Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management.

Authors:  Katherine Wang; Eustathios Kenanidis; Zakareya Gamie; Khurram Suleman; Mark Miodownik; Mahsa Avadi; David Horne; Jonathan Thompson; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Mehran Moazen
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-01-06

5.  Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment for Vancouver B1 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proposal of a Therapeutic Algorithm While Retaining the Original Stable Stem.

Authors:  Nicola Mondanelli; Elisa Troiano; Andrea Facchini; Martina Cesari; Giovanni Battista Colasanti; Vanna Bottai; Francesco Muratori; Carla Caffarelli; Stefano Gonnelli; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 6.  Peri- and Interprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Current Concepts and New Developments for Internal Fixation.

Authors:  Clemens Kösters; Daniel den Toom; Sebastian Metzlaff; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Linda Barz; Steffen Roßlenbroich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Experimental Validation of an ITAP Numerical Model and the Effect of Implant Stem Stiffness on Bone Strain Energy.

Authors:  K Ahmed; R J Greene; W Aston; T Briggs; C Pendegrass; M Moazen; G Blunn
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.934

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.