Literature DB >> 23641123

Now for Me, Later for Us? Effects of Group Context on Temporal Discounting.

Shawn R Charlton1, Richard Yi, Caitlin Porter, Anne E Carter, Warren Bickel, Howard Rachlin.   

Abstract

Delayed rewards are less valuable than immediate rewards. This well-established finding has focused almost entirely on individual outcomes. However, are delayed rewards similarly discounted if they are shared by a group? The current article reports on three experiments exploring the effect of group context on delay discounting. Results indicate that discount rates of individual and group rewards were highly correlated, but that respondents were more willing to wait (decreased discounting) for shared outcomes than for individual outcomes. An explanatory model is proposed suggesting that decreased discount rates in group contexts may be due to the way the effects of both delay and social discounting are combined. That is, in a group context, a person values both a future reward (discounted by delay) and a present reward to another person (discounted by the social distance between them). The results are explained by a combined discount function containing a delay factor and a factor representing the social distance between the decision maker and group members. Practical implications of the fact that shared consequences can increase individual self-control are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delay of gratification; self-control; social cognition; social influences

Year:  2013        PMID: 23641123      PMCID: PMC3639500          DOI: 10.1002/bdm.766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak        ISSN: 0894-3257


  26 in total

Review 1.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk.

Authors:  A L Odum; G J Madden; G J Badger; W K Bickel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Andrea M Begotka; Bethany R Raiff; Lana L Kastern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Bethany R Raiff; Carla H Lagorio; Andrea M Begotka; Angela M Mueller; Daniel J Hehli; Ashley A Wegener
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Temporal discounting when the choice is between two delayed rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Eric W Macaux
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.

Authors:  K N Kirby; N N Maraković
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

8.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence.

Authors:  P A Van Lange; W Otten; E M De Bruin; J A Joireman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-10

9.  Is the delay discounting paradigm useful in understanding social anxiety?

Authors:  Jennifer S Rounds; J Gayle Beck; Demond M Grant
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-08-07

10.  Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Reid D Landes; Paul F Hill; Carole Baxter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  15 in total

1.  Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers.

Authors:  W K Bickel; D P Jarmolowicz; E T Mueller; C T Franck; C Carrin; K M Gatchalian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making.

Authors:  Michael T Bixter; Elizabeth M Trimber; Christian C Luhmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

3.  Using crowdsourcing to compare temporal, social temporal, and probability discounting among obese and non-obese individuals.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; A George Wilson; Christopher T Franck; E Terry Mueller; David P Jarmolowicz; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Samantha J Fede
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 4.  A dual-systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training.

Authors:  Samuel M McClure; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

6.  Digital games for type 1 and type 2 diabetes: underpinning theory with three illustrative examples.

Authors:  Maged N Kamel Boulos; Shauna Gammon; Mavis C Dixon; Sandra M MacRury; Michael J Fergusson; Francisco Miranda Rodrigues; Telmo Mourinho Baptista; Stephen P Yang
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.143

7.  Risk Preferences in Surrogate Decision Making.

Authors:  Eleonore Batteux; Eamonn Ferguson; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2017-07

8.  Delaying rewards has greater effect on altruism when the beneficiary is socially distant.

Authors:  Jerzy Osiński; Adam Karbowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Association between time preference, present-bias and physical activity: implications for designing behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Ruth F Hunter; Jianjun Tang; George Hutchinson; Susan Chilton; David Holmes; Frank Kee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hanneke Scholten; Anouk Scheres; Erik de Water; Uta Graf; Isabela Granic; Maartje Luijten
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.