Literature DB >> 23640743

Independent and combined effects of dietary weight loss and exercise on leukocyte telomere length in postmenopausal women.

Caitlin Mason1, Rosa-Ana Risques, Liren Xiao, Catherine R Duggan, Ikuyo Imayama, Kristin L Campbell, Angela Kong, Karen E Foster-Schubert, C Y Wang, Catherine M Alfano, George L Blackburn, Peter S Rabinovitch, Anne McTiernan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effects of 12 months of dietary weight loss and/or aerobic exercise on leukocyte telomere length in postmenopausal women. DESIGN AND METHODS: Four hundred and thirty nine overweight or obese women (50-75 years) were randomized to: (i) dietary weight loss (N = 118); (ii) aerobic exercise (N = 117), (iii) diet + exercise (N = 117), or (iv) control (N = 87). The diet intervention was a group-based program with a 10% weight loss goal. The exercise intervention was 45 min day(-1) , 5 days week(-1) of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activity. Fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and 12 months. DNA was extracted from isolated leukocytes and telomere length was measured by quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Mean changes were compared between groups (intent-to-treat) using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: Baseline telomere length was inversely associated with age (r = -0.12 P < 0.01) and positively associated with maximal oxygen uptake (r = 0.11, P = 0.03), but not with BMI or %body fat. Change in telomere length was inversely correlated with baseline telomere length (r = -0.47, P < 0.0001). No significant difference in leukocyte telomere length was detected in any intervention group compared to controls, nor was the magnitude of weight loss associated with telomere length at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of dietary weight loss and exercise did not change telomere length in postmenopausal women.
Copyright © 2013 The Obesity Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640743      PMCID: PMC3786031          DOI: 10.1002/oby.20509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


INTRODUCTION

Telomeres are repetitive DNA sequences that comprise the molecular caps of chromosomes and help maintain genetic stability (1). With successive cell division, telomeres undergo incomplete replication leading to gradual shortening; thus, telomere length has been proposed as a useful marker of biological ageing (2, 3). Indeed, short telomeres have been associated with several pathologies of ageing including cancer, cardiovascular disease and dementia (4–7), as well as with early mortality (6, 7). Inflammation and oxidative stress are known to accelerate telomere length shortening (8); however the effect of obesity has not been firmly established. Leukocyte telomere length has been negatively associated with obesity in some (9–13), but not all (14–16), cross-sectional studies. Telomere lengths appear shorter in physically inactive adults compared to active peers, and are significantly preserved among physically fit older adults (17). However, little is known about the effect of weight loss or exercise change on telomere length. Our purpose was to determine the separate and combined effects of 12 months of dietary weight loss and/or aerobic exercise on leukocyte telomere length in overweight and obese postmenopausal women.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

Participants & Interventions

The Nutrition and Exercise in Women (NEW) study was a 12-month randomized controlled trial testing the effects of caloric restriction and/or exercise on circulating hormones and other outcomes. Study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Institutional Review Board in Seattle, WA. All participants provided informed written consent. The study methods have been previously described (18). Briefly, participants were postmenopausal women (50–75 y) with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25.0 kg/m2 or ≥23.0 kg/m2 if Asian-American, recruited through media and mass mailings. Exclusion criteria included: >100 min/week of moderate physical activity; diagnosed diabetes or other serious medical condition(s); postmenopausal hormone use; >2 alcoholic drinks/day; current smoking; participation in another structured weight loss program; contraindication to participation (e.g. abnormal exercise tolerance test, inability to attend sessions). Eligible women were randomized to one of: i) reduced-calorie dietary modification (N=118); ii) moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise (N=117); iii) combined diet and exercise (N=117); or iv) control (no intervention) (N=87) (Figure 1). Computerized random assignment, using permuted blocks randomization to achieve a proportionally smaller control group, was stratified according to BMI (≥ or <30kg/m2) and race/ethnicity.
Figure 1

Flow of participants through the Nutrition and Exercise in Women (NEW) study.

The dietary intervention was a modification of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (19) and Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) (20) lifestyle behavior change programs with goals of: 1200–2000 kcal/day, <30% daily calories from fat, and 10% weight loss. The exercise intervention goal was 45 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous (≥4 metabolic equivalents [METs]) intensity exercise at a target heart rate of 70–85% observed maximum, 5 days/week. Participants attended three facility-based supervised sessions/week and exercised 2 days/week at home.

Measures

All study measures were obtained and analyzed by trained personnel who were blinded to participants’ randomization status. At baseline (pre-randomization) and 12-months, demographic information, height, weight, medical history, dietary intake, supplement use and physical activity data were collected. Body composition was measured by DXA whole-body scanner (GE Lunar, Madison, WI). Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) was assessed using a maximal graded treadmill test according to a modified branching protocol (21). Fasting venous blood (50 mL) was collected during clinic visits (no exercise or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications within 24 hours, no alcohol within 48 hours). Blood was processed within 1 hour and samples were stored at −80°C. DNA was extracted from isolated leukocytes using the Qiagen Midi Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Telomere length was measured by the quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method (22) (University of Washington Cytometry and Telomere Cost Center). For each sample, two PCRs were performed: the first one to amplify the telomeric DNA and the second one to amplify a single-copy control gene (36B4, acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein PO). This provided an internal control to normalize the starting amount of DNA. Telomere length was calculated as the ratio of telomeric DNA divided by the single-copy control gene. All samples were run in triplicate; the median was used for calculations. For quality assurance, duplicate DNA samples were included in each batch. Potential outlier samples with extreme long or short telomeres were repeated to confirm measurements. Inter- and intra-assay variability for qPCR were 6% and 7%, respectively. Samples were analyzed in batches such that each participant’s samples were assayed simultaneously, the number of samples from each study arm were approximately equal, participant randomization dates were similar, and sample order was random. Two participants (1 control; 1 exercise) were excluded at baseline because telomere length could not be measured. A comparative analysis of telomere length measured by qPCR and Southern blot previously reported a high correlation between both methods (r=0.847, p<0.0001) (23).

Statistical Analysis

All available data were used, without imputation for missing values. Pearson correlation coefficients were performed between baseline measures. The mean 12-month change in telomere length in each intervention group was computed and compared to controls using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) modification of linear regression to account for intra-individual correlation over time. Intervention effects were examined based on the assigned treatment at randomization, regardless of adherence or study retention (i.e. intent-to-treat). Assuming 80% power to make three primary pairwise comparisons (diet+exercise vs. exercise; diet+exercise vs. diet; and diet vs. exercise), the minimum detectable difference in telomere length was estimated at 0.082 (type I error=0.05). Based on regression between baseline age and telomere length, a mean change of −0.005 could be expected in our control group. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was made using Bonferroni correction (two-sided alpha=0.05/3). The main analyses were also repeated after stratification by median split of baseline telomere length. The effect of weight loss on telomere length was examined using a stratified analysis (<5%, 5–9.9%, and ≥10%) performed within each group and after combining all intervention groups together. All analyses were adjusted for age and baseline telomere length (23). Additional confounding by baseline BMI, race/ethnicity or smoking status (never, former) were also examined. Analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.2.

RESULTS

At 12-months, 399 participants completed a physical exam, provided a blood sample and underwent a DXA scan; 40 did not complete the study (Figure 1). Participant characteristics, intervention adherence, weight loss and body composition changes over 12 months have been previously published (18). The mean age and BMI were 58.0 years and 30.9 kg/m2. Most women (65%) were college graduates and 85% were non-Hispanic white. Mean weight changes were −2.4% (p=0.03) in the exercise group, −8.5% (p<0.001) in the diet group, and −10.8% (p<0.001) in the diet + exercise group, compared to −0.8% among controls. Women randomized to exercise participated in moderate-to-vigorous activity for a mean (SD) 163.3 (70.6) mins/wk (exercise), and 171.5 (62.9) mins/wk (diet+exercise). Both groups significantly increased average pedometer steps/day (+2416 and +3471 steps/d, respectively) and VO2max (+0.17 and +0.12 L/min, respectively) compared to baseline (18). In both diet groups, women attended an average of 27 diet counseling sessions (86%).

Telomere Length

At baseline, leukocyte telomere length was inversely associated with age (r=−0.12 p<0.01) (Figure 2) and positively associated with VO2max (r=0.11, p=0.03). Telomere length was not significantly correlated with BMI (r=0.02, p=0.68) nor % body fat (r=−0.003, p=0.95). Mean telomere length (SD) was not significantly different between overweight and obese women (1.045 (0.184) vs. 1.057 (0.201); p=0.63).
Figure 2

Scatterplot diagram of baseline leukocyte telomere length vs. age. r=−0.12 p<0.01.

The 12-month change in leukocyte telomere length was significantly inversely correlated with baseline telomere length (r=−0.47, p<0.0001) (Figure 3). However, compared to controls, there were no significant changes in leukocyte telomere length over 12 months in any intervention group (Table 1). When the main analyses were stratified according to baseline telomere length (median split), women with shorter baseline telomere lengths had a greater mean increase in telomere length over 12 months than those with longer baseline telomere lengths; however, no interaction effects were statistically significant in any intervention arm compared to controls (diet: p=0.99; exercise: p=0.32; diet+ex: p=0.63).
Figure 3

Scatterplot diagram of baseline leukocyte telomere length vs. 12-month change in leukocyte telomere length, by intervention group. Control (black circle), Diet (open circle), Exercise (diamond), Diet + Exercise (triangle). r=0.47, p<0.0001.

Table 1

Baseline and 12-mo leukocyte telomere length in overweight and obese postmenopausal women, according to intervention assignment.

Telomere length
Baseline12 mo


NMean (SD)NMean (SD)ChangeChange%p*
Control861.042 (0.197)791.015 (0.171)−0.027−0.3ref
Exercise1161.027 (0.213)1061.025 (0.192)−0.002−0.20.51
Diet1181.058 (0.190)1051.040 (0.179)−0.018−1.60.53
Diet + Ex1171.074 (0.170)1081.075 (0.200)0.0010.10.14

P represents comparison of change within each intervention group compared to controls, adjusted for age and baseline telomere length.

Two participants (1 control; 1 exercise) were excluded at baseline because telomere length could not be measured.

The magnitude of weight loss did not significantly affect the 12-month change in telomere length in any intervention group, or when all intervention arms were combined (Table 2). Change in telomere length was not associated with baseline VO2max, nor with the 12-month change in VO2max among women randomized to exercise. Further adjusting the models for baseline BMI, race/ethnicity or smoking status (never, former) did not meaningfully change any of the results.
Table 2

12-month change in telomere length, stratified by %weight loss in overweight and obese postmenopausal women randomized to dietary weight loss and/or aerobic exercise.

NBaselineN12 moChange%Change
CONTROL861.042 (0.197)791.015 (0.171)−0.027−2.6
EXERCISE
  ≤0% loss (no change or gain)291.041 (0.156)291.047 (0.174)0.0060.5
  <5% loss461.013 (0.217)461.011 (0.188)−0.002−0.2
  5–10% loss291.044 (0.257)301.029 (0.219)−0.015−1.5
Ptrend0.81
DIET
  ≤0% loss (no change or gain)101.028 (0.195)101.115 (0.221)0. 0873.1
  <5% loss181.043 (0.200)181.038 (0.180)−0.005−0.5
  5–10% loss271.043 (0.181)271.031 (0.153)−0.012−1.2
  ≥10% loss491.056 (0.201)491.028 (0.185)−0.028−2.6
Ptrend0.22
DIET+EXERCISE
  ≤0% loss (no change or gain)41.170 (0.102)41.156 (0.083)−0.014−1.2
  <5% loss141.084 (0.141)131.032 (0.245)−0.052−4.8
  5–10% loss211.081 (0.160)211.083 (0.187)0.0020.2
  ≥10% loss701.075 (0.183)701.076 (0.201)0.0010.1
Ptrend0.57
ALL INTERVENTIONS
  ≤0% loss (no change or gain)431.063 (0.163)431.073 (0.181)0.0101.0
  <5% loss781.033 (0.201)771.021 (0.195)−0.012−1.1
  5–10% loss731.035 (0.191)741.034 (0.183)−0.001−0.1
  ≥10% loss1231.078 (0.198)1231.062 (0.198)−0.016−1.5
Ptrend0.51

Ptrend across weight loss groups, within each intervention group, adjusted for age and baseline telomere length.

Analyses based on all available data. In total, 396 women had complete baseline and 12-month data for analysis.

Over 12-months there was a net increase (mean leukocyte telomere length: 0.124, range: 0.002–0.736) in telomere length among 48% (n=190) of women. The proportion of women who experienced a net 12-month increase was not significantly different between groups (χ2 p=0.90).

DISCUSSION

The predominant mechanisms through which obesity may shorten telomere length and increase risk of ageing-related diseases include heightened oxidative stress, which increases telomere erosion, and inflammation, which accelerates leukocyte turnover (2). Weight loss has demonstrated effects on both of these processes (24, 25). However, our results suggest that 12 months of dietary weight loss and/or aerobic exercise sufficient to yield clinically meaningful weight loss in a majority of women, did not alter telomere length compared with controls. Only a few observational studies have examined the association between adult weight and telomere length prospectively. Two studies, one including 647 women (35–74 y) (26) and the other including 70 young African American and white men and women (27) reported reduced telomere length associated with weight gain over 10 years or more follow-up, while waist-to-hip ratio was significantly associated with greater rate of telomere shortening over the subsequent 5 years in 608 patients with stable coronary artery disease (28). Results from the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study randomized controlled trial showed only a weak inverse association (r=−0.12, p=0.03) between leukocyte telomere length and change in BMI over a mean 4.5 year follow-up in 311 middle-aged adults with impaired glucose tolerance, with no significant difference between the lifestyle intervention group and controls (29). Lee et al. (11) previously reported a stronger negative association between obesity and telomere length in younger compared with older persons. Thus, it is possible that the ability to detect a significant effect of weight loss was diminished in our relatively homogeneous sample of postmenopausal women. A previous study by LaRocca et al. (17) found that leukocyte telomere length was greater in a small sample (n=17) of endurance-trained older adults (who performed regular vigorous exercise ≥5 days/week for 5 years or longer) compared to inactive peers (n=15), and was not significantly different from young exercise-trained adults (n=10). Physical fitness has also been associated with telomere length in patients with coronary heart disease, such that patients with low fitness had more than a 2-fold greater odds of having telomere lengths in the lowest quartile compared to those with high fitness (30). We did not observe a significant difference in telomere length between controls and women randomized to exercise for 12 months, despite significant improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness. This suggests that the exercise dose or duration may have been insufficient to alter telomere dynamics in our population. It is also possible that underlying genetic factors could predispose individuals with longer telomeres to exercise or that the underlying biology of individuals with a history of being overweight and inactive (as our participants were) may render telomeres less responsive to lifestyle intervention in contrast to the endurance trained athletes previously studied. Additionally, our study may have been underpowered to detect significant changes in telomere length between groups. Given the paucity of available data and the difficulty directly comparing relative leukocyte telomere length data across studies because of differences in qPCR methodology, further research is needed to confirm our results. However, the current results should provide valuable guidance in estimating anticipated effect sizes in future studies. Although telomeres gradually shorten with age, telomere length is active and dynamic (31). Thus, 12 months of behavioral intervention may have been too short a period over which to capture significant change in telomere length. Furthermore, we did not measure telomerase in this study- a critical enzyme that maintains telomere length and cellular replicate potential (32). Results from an uncontrolled pilot study in prostate cancer patients demonstrated a significant increase in telomerase activity after 3 months of intervention involving dietary modification, moderate aerobic activity, stress management and group support (33). Thus, telomerase may be more sensitive to lifestyle changes as it also has independent effects on cell and immune function (34). Although telomere shortening represents a compelling link between genetics, accumulated lifestyle exposures, obesity and ageing-related diseases, continued research is needed to determine the degree to which telomere length may be responsive to change through specific lifestyle interventions.
  33 in total

1.  Oxidative stress shortens telomeres.

Authors:  Thomas von Zglinicki
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Telomere length, risk of coronary heart disease, and statin treatment in the West of Scotland Primary Prevention Study: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Scott W Brouilette; Jasbir S Moore; Alex D McMahon; John R Thompson; Ian Ford; James Shepherd; Chris J Packard; Nilesh J Samani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Telomeres and human aging: facts and fibs.

Authors:  Abraham Aviv
Journal:  Sci Aging Knowledge Environ       Date:  2004-12-22

4.  Exercise and diet induced weight loss improves measures of oxidative stress and insulin sensitivity in adults with characteristics of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  R Scott Rector; Shana O Warner; Ying Liu; Pamela S Hinton; Grace Y Sun; Richard H Cox; Craig S Stump; M Harold Laughlin; Kevin C Dellsperger; Tom R Thomas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 4.310

5.  Association of shorter leukocyte telomere repeat length with dementia and mortality.

Authors:  Lawrence S Honig; Min Suk Kang; Nicole Schupf; Joseph H Lee; Richard Mayeux
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2012-10

Review 6.  Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond.

Authors:  Maria A Blasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Rise in insulin resistance is associated with escalated telomere attrition.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Gardner; Shengxu Li; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Wei Chen; Masayuki Kimura; Xiaobin Lu; Gerald S Berenson; Abraham Aviv
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.

Authors:  William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Donna H Ryan; Mark A Espeland; Gary D Foster; Steven M Haffner; Van S Hubbard; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; Susan Z Yanovski
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2003-10

10.  Recognition and elongation of telomeres by telomerase.

Authors:  E H Blackburn; C W Greider; E Henderson; M S Lee; J Shampay; D Shippen-Lentz
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.166

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Telomere Length Maintenance and Cardio-Metabolic Disease Prevention Through Exercise Training.

Authors:  Joshua Denham; Brendan J O'Brien; Fadi J Charchar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Body mass index is negatively associated with telomere length: a collaborative cross-sectional meta-analysis of 87 observational studies.

Authors:  Marij Gielen; Geja J Hageman; Evangelia E Antoniou; Katarina Nordfjall; Massimo Mangino; Muthuswamy Balasubramanyam; Tim de Meyer; Audrey E Hendricks; Erik J Giltay; Steven C Hunt; Jennifer A Nettleton; Klelia D Salpea; Vanessa A Diaz; Ramin Farzaneh-Far; Gil Atzmon; Sarah E Harris; Lifang Hou; David Gilley; Iiris Hovatta; Jeremy D Kark; Hisham Nassar; David J Kurz; Karen A Mather; Peter Willeit; Yun-Ling Zheng; Sofia Pavanello; Ellen W Demerath; Line Rode; Daniel Bunout; Andrew Steptoe; Lisa Boardman; Amelia Marti; Belinda Needham; Wei Zheng; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Andrew J Pellatt; Jaakko Kaprio; Jonathan N Hofmann; Christian Gieger; Giuseppe Paolisso; Jacob B H Hjelmborg; Lisa Mirabello; Teresa Seeman; Jason Wong; Pim van der Harst; Linda Broer; Florian Kronenberg; Barbara Kollerits; Timo Strandberg; Dan T A Eisenberg; Catherine Duggan; Josine E Verhoeven; Roxanne Schaakxs; Raffaela Zannolli; Rosana M R Dos Reis; Fadi J Charchar; Maciej Tomaszewski; Ute Mons; Ilja Demuth; Andrea Elena Iglesias Molli; Guo Cheng; Dmytro Krasnienkov; Bianca D'Antono; Marek Kasielski; Barry J McDonnell; Richard Paul Ebstein; Kristina Sundquist; Guillaume Pare; Michael Chong; Maurice P Zeegers
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Energy balance and gastrointestinal cancer: risk, interventions, outcomes and mechanisms.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ulrich; Caroline Himbert; Andreana N Holowatyj; Stephen D Hursting
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Resistance training improves skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in elderly offspring of overweight and obese mothers.

Authors:  Marco Bucci; Ville Huovinen; Maria Angela Guzzardi; Suvi Koskinen; Juho R Raiko; Heta Lipponen; Shaila Ahsan; Robert M Badeau; Miikka-Juhani Honka; Jukka Koffert; Nina Savisto; Minna K Salonen; Jonathan Andersson; Joel Kullberg; Samuel Sandboge; Patricia Iozzo; Johan G Eriksson; Pirjo Nuutila
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Dietary Weight Loss and Exercise Effects on Serum Biomarkers of Angiogenesis in Overweight Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Catherine Duggan; Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Ching-Yun Wang; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Effects of Intentional Weight Loss on Markers of Oxidative Stress, DNA Repair and Telomere Length - a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caroline Himbert; Henry Thompson; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.942

7.  No effect of weight loss on LINE-1 methylation levels in peripheral blood leukocytes from postmenopausal overweight women.

Authors:  Catherine Duggan; Liren Xiao; Mary Beth Terry; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Adiposity and Leukocyte Telomere Length in US Adults by Sex-Specific Race/Ethnicity: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Sharon K Davis; Ruihua Xu; Rumana J Khan; Amadou Gaye
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 1.847

9.  Weight loss associated with bariatric surgery does not restore short telomere length of severe obese patients after 1 year.

Authors:  Caterina Formichi; Silvia Cantara; Cristina Ciuoli; Ornella Neri; Francesco Chiofalo; Federico Selmi; Andrea Tirone; Giuseppina Colasanto; Leonardo Di Cosmo; Giuseppe Vuolo; Furio Pacini
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Do telomeres adapt to physiological stress? Exploring the effect of exercise on telomere length and telomere-related proteins.

Authors:  Andrew T Ludlow; Lindsay W Ludlow; Stephen M Roth
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.