Literature DB >> 23640274

A new framework to accurately quantify soil bacterial community diversity from DGGE.

Jonathan Lalande1, Richard Villemur, Louise Deschênes.   

Abstract

Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) has been and remains extensively used to assess and monitor the effects of various treatments on soil bacterial communities. Considering only abundant phylotypes, the diversity estimates produced by this technique have been proven to be uncorrelated to true community diversity. The aim of this paper was to develop a framework to estimate a community's true diversity from DGGE. Developed using in silico DGGE profiles generated from published pyrosequencing datasets, this framework elongates the rank-abundance distributions (RADs) drawn by band quantification using the peak-to-signal ratio (PSR) parameter, which was proven to be related to bacterial richness. The ability to compare DGGE-based diversity estimates to the true diversity of communities led to a unique opportunity to identify potential pitfalls when analyzing DGGE gels with commercial analysis software programs and gain insight into the process of DNA band clustering in the profiles. Bacterial diversity was compared through richness, Shannon, and Simpson's 1/D indices. Intermediate results demonstrated that, even though commercial gel analysis software programs were unable to produce consistent results throughout all samples, a newly developed Matlab-based framework unraveled the dominance profiles of communities from band quantification. Elongating these partial RADs using the PSRs extracted from the DGGE profiles chiefly made it possible to accurately estimate the true diversity of communities. For all the samples analyzed, the estimated Shannon and Simpson's 1/D were accurate at ±10 %. Richness estimations were less accurate, ranging from -11 to 31 % of the expected values. The framework showed great potential to study the structure and diversity of soil bacterial communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640274     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0230-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  25 in total

1.  Empirical and theoretical bacterial diversity in four Arizona soils.

Authors:  John Dunbar; Susan M Barns; Lawrence O Ticknor; Cheryl R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Metagenomic analyses: past and future trends.

Authors:  Carola Simon; Rolf Daniel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Interpreting ecological diversity indices applied to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data: insights from simulated microbial communities.

Authors:  Christopher B Blackwood; Deborah Hudleston; Donald R Zak; Jeffrey S Buyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities.

Authors:  Tom C J Hill; Kerry A Walsh; James A Harris; Bruce F Moffett
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 4.194

5.  Detection and localization of single base changes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  R M Myers; T Maniatis; L S Lerman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Bacterial diversity promotes community stability and functional resilience after perturbation.

Authors:  M S Girvan; C D Campbell; K Killham; J I Prosser; L A Glover
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Comparative analysis of bacterial communities in a potato field as determined by pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Özgül Inceoğlu; Waleed Abu Al-Soud; Joana Falcão Salles; Alexander V Semenov; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert Pinard; Alex de Winter; Gary J Sarkis; Mark B Gerstein; Karrie R Tartaro; Ramona N Plant; Michael Egholm; Jonathan M Rothberg; John H Leamon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Evidence from GC-TRFLP that bacterial communities in soil are lognormally distributed.

Authors:  James R Doroghazi; Daniel H Buckley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Juliane C Dohm; Claudio Lottaz; Tatiana Borodina; Heinz Himmelbauer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Only Simpson diversity can be estimated accurately from microbial community fingerprints.

Authors:  Bart Haegeman; Biswarup Sen; Jean-Jacques Godon; Jérôme Hamelin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Characterization of Uncultured Genome Fragment from Soil Metagenomic Library Exposed Rare Mismatch of Internal Tetranucleotide Frequency.

Authors:  Yunpeng Liu; Dongqing Yang; Nan Zhang; Lin Chen; Zhongli Cui; Qirong Shen; Ruifu Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Analysis of microbial diversity in Shenqu with different fermentation times by PCR-DGGE.

Authors:  Tengfei Liu; Tianzhu Jia; Jiangning Chen; Xiaoyu Liu; Minjie Zhao; Pengpeng Liu
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Vertebrate bacterial gut diversity: size also matters.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Godon; Pugazhendi Arulazhagan; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Jérôme Hamelin
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.