Literature DB >> 12039765

Empirical and theoretical bacterial diversity in four Arizona soils.

John Dunbar1, Susan M Barns, Lawrence O Ticknor, Cheryl R Kuske.   

Abstract

Understanding patterns of biodiversity in microbial communities is severely constrained by the difficulty of adequately sampling these complex systems. We illustrate the problem with empirical data from small surveys (200-member 16S rRNA gene clone libraries) of four bacterial soil communities from two locations in Arizona. Among the four surveys, nearly 500 species-level groups ( Dunbar et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:662-1669, 1999) and 21 bacterial divisions were documented, including four new candidate divisions provisionally designated SC1, SC2, SC3, and SC4. We devised a simple approach to constructing theoretical null models of bacterial species abundance. These null models provide, for the first time, detailed descriptions of soil bacterial community structure that can be used to guide experimental design. Models based on a lognormal distribution were consistent with the observed sizes of the four communities and the richness of the clone surveys. Predictions from the models showed that the species richness of small surveys from complex communities is reproducible, whereas the species composition is not. By using the models, we can now estimate the required survey scale to document specified fractions of community diversity. For example, documentation of half the species in each model community would require surveys of 16,284 to 44,000 individuals. However, quantitative comparisons of half the species in two communities would require surveys at least 10-fold larger for each community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12039765      PMCID: PMC123964          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3035-3045.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  28 in total

1.  Analysis of bacterial communities in heavy metal-contaminated soils at different levels of resolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) continues.

Authors:  B L Maidak; J R Cole; T G Lilburn; C T Parker; P R Saxman; J M Stredwick; G M Garrity; B Li; G J Olsen; S Pramanik; T M Schmidt; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  The species concept for prokaryotes.

Authors:  R Rosselló-Mora; R Amann
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 16.408

4.  High bacterial diversity in permanently cold marine sediments.

Authors:  K Ravenschlag; K Sahm; J Pernthaler; R Amann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Assessment of microbial diversity in four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis.

Authors:  J Dunbar; L O Ticknor; C R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity.

Authors:  J B Hughes; J J Hellmann; T H Ricketts; B J Bohannan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16S rRNA gene cloning.

Authors:  J Dunbar; S Takala; S M Barns; J A Davis; C R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Evaluation of PCR-generated chimeras, mutations, and heteroduplexes with 16S rRNA gene-based cloning.

Authors:  X Qiu; L Wu; H Huang; P E McDonel; A V Palumbo; J M Tiedje; J Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil.

Authors:  Jizhong Zhou; Beicheng Xia; David S Treves; L-Y Wu; Terry L Marsh; Robert V O'Neill; Anthony V Palumbo; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Exploring prokaryotic diversity in the genomic era.

Authors:  Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  89 in total

1.  Modeling bacterial species abundance from small community surveys.

Authors:  R Narang; J Dunbar
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Biodiversity, community structural shifts, and biogeography of prokaryotes within Antarctic continental shelf sediment.

Authors:  John P Bowman; Robert D McCuaig
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) gene fragments differ between native and cultivated Michigan soils.

Authors:  Blaz Stres; Ivan Mahne; Gorazd Avgustin; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Statistical approaches for estimating actinobacterial diversity in marine sediments.

Authors:  James E M Stach; Luis A Maldonado; Douglas G Masson; Alan C Ward; Michael Goodfellow; Alan T Bull
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Prevalence of the Chloroflexi-related SAR202 bacterioplankton cluster throughout the mesopelagic zone and deep ocean.

Authors:  R M Morris; M S Rappé; E Urbach; S A Connon; S J Giovannoni
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Integration of microbial ecology and statistics: a test to compare gene libraries.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Bret R Larget; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  GC fractionation enhances microbial community diversity assessment and detection of minority populations of bacteria by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  William E Holben; Kevin P Feris; Anu Kettunen; Juha H A Apajalahti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Microbial diversity and heterogeneity in sandy subsurface soils.

Authors:  Jizhong Zhou; Beicheng Xia; Heshu Huang; Anthony V Palumbo; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genotypic distribution of a specialist model microorganism, Methanosaeta, along an estuarine gradient: does metabolic restriction limit niche differentiation potential?

Authors:  Franck Carbonero; Brian B Oakley; Robert J Hawkins; Kevin J Purdy
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria in tubes constructed by the marine infaunal polychaete Diopatra cuprea.

Authors:  George Y Matsui; David B Ringelberg; Charles R Lovell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.