Literature DB >> 23640110

First clinical evaluation of a new innovative ureteral access sheath (Re-Trace™): a European study.

Steeve Doizi1, Thomas Knoll, Cesare M Scoffone, Alberto Breda, Marianne Brehmer, Evangelos Liatsikos, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Olivier Traxer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) during flexible retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become increasingly popular. Our aim was to evaluate the accessibility of a new UAS device, allowing the transformation of the working guidewire into a safety guidewire.
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted between January and February 2010 in six European tertiary reference centers. Patients needing flexible RIRS were eligible to participate in the study. In all cases, insertion of the Re-Trace™ (12/14Fr, Coloplast, Denmark) was attempted at the beginning of the procedure. Insertion success was defined as placement of the UAS in the lumbar ureter with successful disengagement of the working guidewire, which turned into a safety guidewire. Influence of gender and pre-stenting status was analyzed by univariate analysis.
RESULTS: 137 UASs were used in 75 male and 62 female patients. 25.5% of ureters were pre-stented: men were 2.17 more often pre-stented than women. The overall Re-Trace™ insertion rate was 82.5%. Success rate was not significantly different between men and women (77.3 vs. 88.7%, respectively, p = 0.11). Pre-stenting status did not significantly influence the success rate (p = 0.31). When analyzing the combined influence of pre-stenting status and gender, the worst success rates seemed to be obtained in men without pre-stenting, but no significant differences were found between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-Trace™ UAS showed good overall insertion rates. This evaluation validated the new concept of guidewire disengagement: A single wire automatically switches from working to safety role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640110     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1094-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath.

Authors:  Richard Vanlangendonck; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Single-center clinical comparison of two reinforced ureteral access sheaths for retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Prashanth Kanagarajah; John Shields; Ezekiel Young; Alina Alvarez; Vincent G Bird
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter.

Authors:  H Takayasu; Y Aso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A general ureteral dilator-sheathing system.

Authors:  R C Newman; P T Hunter; I F Hawkins; B Finlayson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Applications of the peel-away introducer sheath.

Authors:  M Rich; W J Lee; A D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Joshua M Stern; Jenny Yiee; Sangtae Park
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy?

Authors:  J Kourambas; R R Byrne; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Brian K Auge; Paul K Pietrow; Costas D Lallas; Ganesh V Raj; Robert W Santa-Cruz; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Alexandre Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Construction-related differences seen in ureteral access sheaths: comparison of reinforced versus nonreinforced ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  John M Shields; Hari S G R Tunuguntla; Vishal K Bhalani; Rajnikanth Ayyathurai; Vincent G Bird
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  6 in total

1.  The new concept of ureteral access sheath with guidewire disengagement: One wire does it all.

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Esteban Emiliani; Felix Millán; Cesare Marco Scoffone; Thomas Knoll; Palle J S Osther; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 1.

Authors:  Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Özcan Kılıç; Murat Akand
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 3.  Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Ken Anson; Guido Giusti; Michael Grasso; Guido Kamphuis; Sven Lahme; Evangelos Liatsikos; Anup Patel; Margaret S Pearle; Luc Valiquette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Disposable devices for RIRS: where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future?

Authors:  Richard H Shin; Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Intrarenal pressure and irrigation flow with commonly used ureteric access sheaths and instruments.

Authors:  Anna Wright; Kevin Williams; Bhaskar Somani; Nicholas Rukin
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-11-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.