| Literature DB >> 23639900 |
Paul S Kruszka1, Irini Manoli, Jennifer L Sloan, Jeffrey B Kopp, Charles P Venditti.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to predict renal growth based on clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with isolated methylmalonic acidemia, a group of disorders associated with chronic kidney disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23639900 PMCID: PMC4149057 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Med ISSN: 1098-3600 Impact factor: 8.822
Figure 2(a). Renal length vs. age, stratified by serum methylmalonic acid level. Patients with greater than 2000 micromolar serum methylmalonic acid have smaller kidneys. (b). Renal length vs. height, stratified by serum methylmalonic level. Similar to Figure 2(a), more severely affected patients with higher serum methylmalonic acid levels have smaller kidneys across height spectrum.
Renal Length of MMA subjects vs. Controls, by age
The average and SD for renal length values for MMA patients (all enzymatic subtypes) and control subjects are presented in one year age intervals. Right and left renal lengths are averaged. Comparisons using the t test assumed unequal variances. Data from controls are from Rosenbaum et al.[26] Asterisk denotes data not available.
| MMA Patients | Controls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Age (years) | Observations | Renal Length (cm) | Observations | Renal Length (cm) | |
| 2 to 3 | 6 | 6.22 ± 0.88 | 12 | 7.36 ± 0.54 | 0.01 |
| 3 to 4 | 6 | 7.19 ± 0.78 | 30 | 7.36 ± 0.64 | 0.32 |
| 4 to 5 | 7 | 6.88 ± 0.80 | 26 | 7.87 ± 0.50 | 0.013 |
| 5 to 6 | 2 | 6.48 ± 1.17 | 30 | 8.09 ± 0.54 | 0.009 |
| 6 to 7 | 7 | 7.24 ±1.2 | 14 | 7.83 ± 0.72 | 0.13 |
| 7 to 8 | 6 | 7.87 ± 0.86 | 18 | 8.33 ± 0.51 | 0.13 |
| 8 to 9 | 4 | 8.39 ± 0.99 | 18 | 8.90 ± 0.88 | 0.19 |
| 9 to 10 | 2 | 7.5 ± 1.77 | 14 | 9.20 ± 0.90 | 0.19 |
| 10 to 11 | 6 | 7.57 ±1.17 | 28 | 9.17 ± 0.82 | 0.008 |
| 11 to 12 | 3 | 7.64 ± 0.67 | 22 | 9.60 ± 0.64 | 0.008 |
| 12 to 13 | 2 | 9.03 ± 0.53 | 18 | 10.42 ± 0.87 | 0.023 |
| 13 to 14 | 5 | 9.12 ± 0.62 | 14 | 9.79 ± 0.75 | 0.039 |
| 14 to 15 | 2 | 8.85 ± 0.07 | 14 | 10.05 ± 0.62 | <0.001 |
| 15 to 16 | * | * | 6 | 10.93 ± 0.76 | * |
| 16 to 17 | 1 | 8.65 | 10 | 10.04 ± 0.86 | * |
| 17 to 18 | 3 | 9.52 ± 0.42 | 4 | 10.53 ± 0.29 | 0.016 |
| 18 to 19 | 1 | 8.8 | 8 | 10.81 ± 1.13 | * |
| TOTAL | 62 | 768 | |||
Figure 1Renal length (average of left and right) vs. age in methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) and age-matched controls[26]. Mean ± SD. Asterisk denotes p < 0.05.
Figure 3Serum methylmalonic acid (MMAS) for all enzymatic subtypes vs. eGFR creatinine - cystatin C. Best fitted linear regression lines are shown for eGFR ≤ 60 and eGFR > 60. MMAS increases markedly for eGFR values below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Figure 4eGFR creatinine for all enzymatic subtype patients declines with age, reflective of a progressive chronic kidney disease. eGFR calculated using the updated Schwartz equation for children.[16] For adults, the CKD-EPI creatinine equation was used.[17] The solid line represents linear regression for patients with serum methylmalonic acid less than 2000 micromolar and dashed lines represent a linear regression for serum methylmalonic acid greater than 2000. The patients with a higher serum methylmalonic acid show a lower eGFR.