PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine Lynch syndrome screening of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in integrated health-care-delivery organizations. METHODS: We determined the availability of Lynch syndrome screening criteria and actual Lynch syndrome screening in the medical records of 1,188 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2009 at seven institutions in the Cancer Research Network. RESULTS: We found infrequent use of Lynch syndrome screening (41/1,188). Family history was available for 937 of the 1,188 patients (79%). There was sufficient information to assess Lynch syndrome risk using family history-based criteria in 719 of the 937 patients (77%) with family history documentation. In 391 individuals with a family history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer, 107 (27%) could not be evaluated due to missing information such as age of cancer onset. Eleven percent of patients who met the Bethesda criteria and 25% of individuals who met the Amsterdam II criteria were screened for Lynch syndrome. Recommended guidelines were adhered to during screening, but no testing method was preferred. CONCLUSION: The information required for Lynch syndrome screening decisions is routinely collected but seldom used. There is a critical gap between collection of family history and its use to guide Lynch syndrome screening, which may support a case for implementation of universal screening guidelines.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine Lynch syndrome screening of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in integrated health-care-delivery organizations. METHODS: We determined the availability of Lynch syndrome screening criteria and actual Lynch syndrome screening in the medical records of 1,188 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2009 at seven institutions in the Cancer Research Network. RESULTS: We found infrequent use of Lynch syndrome screening (41/1,188). Family history was available for 937 of the 1,188 patients (79%). There was sufficient information to assess Lynch syndrome risk using family history-based criteria in 719 of the 937 patients (77%) with family history documentation. In 391 individuals with a family history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer, 107 (27%) could not be evaluated due to missing information such as age of cancer onset. Eleven percent of patients who met the Bethesda criteria and 25% of individuals who met the Amsterdam II criteria were screened for Lynch syndrome. Recommended guidelines were adhered to during screening, but no testing method was preferred. CONCLUSION: The information required for Lynch syndrome screening decisions is routinely collected but seldom used. There is a critical gap between collection of family history and its use to guide Lynch syndrome screening, which may support a case for implementation of universal screening guidelines.
Authors: Aparna Mukherjee; Thomas J McGarrity; Francesca Ruggiero; Walter Koltun; Kevin McKenna; Lisa Poritz; Maria J Baker Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 2.857
Authors: Scott M Weissman; Randall Burt; James Church; Steve Erdman; Heather Hampel; Spring Holter; Kory Jasperson; Matt F Kalady; Joy Larsen Haidle; Henry T Lynch; Selvi Palaniappan; Paul E Wise; Leigha Senter Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Uri Ladabaum; Grace Wang; Jonathan Terdiman; Amie Blanco; Miriam Kuppermann; C Richard Boland; James Ford; Elena Elkin; Kathryn A Phillips Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Gene Hart; Jennifer L Ellis; Donald J Bachman; Gary Ansell; Sarah M Greene; Edward H Wagner; Roy Pardee; Mark M Schmidt; Ann Geiger; Amy L Butani; Terry Field; Hassan Fouayzi; Irina Miroshnik; Liyan Liu; Robert Diseker; Karen Wells; Rick Krajenta; Lois Lamerato; Christine Neslund Dudas Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2005
Authors: Scott M Weissman; Cecelia Bellcross; Christina Chimera Bittner; Mary E Freivogel; Joy Larsen Haidle; Pardeep Kaurah; Anna Leininger; Selvi Palaniappan; Kelle Steenblock; Thuy M Vu; Molly S Daniels Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Noralane M Lindor; Gloria M Petersen; Donald W Hadley; Anita Y Kinney; Susan Miesfeldt; Karen H Lu; Patrick Lynch; Wylie Burke; Nancy Press Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-09-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Edward Martin; Mark Arnold; Karamjit Khanduja; Philip Kuebler; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Kaisa Sotamaa; Thomas W Prior; Judith Westman; Jenny Panescu; Dan Fix; Janet Lockman; Ilene Comeras; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laura C Beamer; Marcia L Grant; Carin R Espenschied; Kathleen R Blazer; Heather L Hampel; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Deborah J MacDonald Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cecelia A Bellcross; Sara R Bedrosian; Elvan Daniels; Debra Duquette; Heather Hampel; Kory Jasperson; Djenaba A Joseph; Celia Kaye; Ira Lubin; Laurence J Meyer; Michele Reyes; Maren T Scheuner; Sheri D Schully; Leigha Senter; Sherri L Stewart; Jeanette St Pierre; Judith Westman; Paul Wise; Vincent W Yang; Muin J Khoury Journal: Genet Med Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Aparna R Parikh; Nancy L Keating; Pang-Hsiang Liu; Stacy W Gray; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine L Kahn; David A Haggstrom; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin Kim Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Kathleen A Arnold; Jennifer E Cook; Jamilyn Zepp; Marian J Gilmore; Alan F Rope; James V Davis; Kellene M Bergen; Elizabeth Esterberg; Kristin R Muessig; Susan K Peterson; Sapna Syngal; Louise Acheson; Georgia Wiesner; Jacob Reiss; Katrina A B Goddard Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Elizabeth V Clarke; Kristin R Muessig; Jamilyn Zepp; Jessica E Hunter; Sapna Syngal; Louise S Acheson; Georgia L Wiesner; Susan K Peterson; Kellene M Bergen; Elizabeth Shuster; James V Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Tia L Kauffman; Marian J Gilmore; Jacob A Reiss; Alan F Rope; Jennifer E Cook; Katrina A B Goddard Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Talha Shaikh; Elizabeth A Handorf; Joshua E Meyer; Michael J Hall; Nestor F Esnaola Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Celine H M Leenen; Anne Goverde; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Anja Wagner; Margot G F van Lier; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Carli M Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Winand N M Dinjens; Monique E van Leerdam; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 8.822