Literature DB >> 23638841

Potential environmental and human health impacts of rechargeable lithium batteries in electronic waste.

Daniel Hsing Po Kang1, Mengjun Chen, Oladele A Ogunseitan.   

Abstract

Rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) and lithium-polymer (Li-poly) batteries have recently become dominant in consumer electronic products because of advantages associated with energy density and product longevity. However, the small size of these batteries, the high rate of disposal of consumer products in which they are used, and the lack of uniform regulatory policy on their disposal means that lithium batteries may contribute substantially to environmental pollution and adverse human health impacts due to potentially toxic materials. In this research, we used standardized leaching tests, life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and hazard assessment models to evaluate hazardous waste classification, resource depletion potential, and toxicity potentials of lithium batteries used in cellphones. Our results demonstrate that according to U.S. federal regulations, defunct Li-ion batteries are classified hazardous due to their lead (Pb) content (average 6.29 mg/L; σ = 11.1; limit 5). However, according to California regulations, all lithium batteries tested are classified hazardous due to excessive levels of cobalt (average 163,544 mg/kg; σ = 62,897; limit 8000), copper (average 98,694 mg/kg; σ = 28,734; limit 2500), and nickel (average 9525 mg/kg; σ = 11,438; limit 2000). In some of the Li-ion batteries, the leached concentrations of chromium, lead, and thallium exceeded the California regulation limits. The environmental impact associated with resource depletion and human toxicity is mainly associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver, whereas the ecotoxicity potential is primarily associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver. However, the relative contribution of aluminum and lithium to human toxicity and ecotoxicity could not be estimated due to insufficient toxicity data in the models. These findings support the need for stronger government policy at the local, national, and international levels to encourage recovery, recycling, and reuse of lithium battery materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23638841      PMCID: PMC5920515          DOI: 10.1021/es400614y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  International harmonization of models for selecting less toxic chemical alternatives: Effect of regulatory disparities in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  Carl W Lam; Muskilda P Aguirre; Karsten Schischke; Nils F Nissen; Oladele A Ogunseitan; Julie M Schoenung
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.992

2.  Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles.

Authors:  Dominic A Notter; Marcel Gauch; Rolf Widmer; Patrick Wäger; Anna Stamp; Rainer Zah; Hans-Jörg Althaus
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Factors affecting TCLP lead leachability from computer CPUs.

Authors:  Kevin N Vann; Stephen E Musson; Timothy G Townsend
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 7.145

4.  Leaching assessments of hazardous materials in cellular telephones.

Authors:  John D Lincoln; Oladele A Ogunseitan; Andrew A Shapiro; Jean-Daniel M Saphores
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Science and regulation. The electronics revolution: from e-wonderland to e-wasteland.

Authors:  Oladele A Ogunseitan; Julie M Schoenung; Jean-Daniel M Saphores; Andrew A Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Potential environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs.

Authors:  Seong-Rin Lim; Daniel Kang; Oladele A Ogunseitan; Julie M Schoenung
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  RCRA toxicity characterization of discarded electronic devices.

Authors:  Stephen E Musson; Kevin N Vann; Yong-Chul Jang; Sarvesh Mutha; Aaron Jordan; Brian Pearson; Timothy G Townsend
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles.

Authors:  Guillaume Majeau-Bettez; Troy R Hawkins; Anders Hammer Strømman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Human health and ecological toxicity potentials due to heavy metal content in waste electronic devices with flat panel displays.

Authors:  Seong-Rin Lim; Julie M Schoenung
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 10.588

  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage.

Authors:  D Larcher; J-M Tarascon
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Quantifying the environmental impact of a Li-rich high-capacity cathode material in electric vehicles via life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Yajuan Yu; Kai Huang; Bo Chen; Wensheng Deng; Ying Yao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Application of Life Cycle Assessment on Electronic Waste Management: A Review.

Authors:  Mianqiang Xue; Zhenming Xu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Environmental health hazards of e-cigarettes and their components: Oxidants and copper in e-cigarette aerosols.

Authors:  Chad A Lerner; Isaac K Sundar; Richard M Watson; Alison Elder; Ryan Jones; Douglas Done; Rachel Kurtzman; Deborah J Ossip; Risa Robinson; Scott McIntosh; Irfan Rahman
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Efficient model photosensitizers based on metallocenyl complexes with thiophene-N = N-pyrimidine as π-conjugated bridge and cyanoacrylate as an anchoring group: a density functional theory study.

Authors:  Amina C Berrekhchi-Berrahma; Michael Springborg; Meijuan Zhou; Abdelghani Haddou; Majda Sekkal Rahal
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Nephrotoxic Metal Mixtures and Preadolescent Kidney Function.

Authors:  Yuri Levin-Schwartz; Maria D Politis; Chris Gennings; Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz; Daniel Flores; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Ivan Pantic; Mari Cruz Tolentino; Guadalupe Estrada-Gutierrez; Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa; Martha M Tellez-Rojo; Andrea A Baccarelli; Robert O Wright; Alison P Sanders
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-02

7.  Closed Loop Recycling of Electric Vehicle Batteries to Enable Ultra-high Quality Cathode Powder.

Authors:  Mengyuan Chen; Zhangfeng Zheng; Qiang Wang; Yubin Zhang; Xiaotu Ma; Chao Shen; Dapeng Xu; Jin Liu; Yangtao Liu; Paul Gionet; Ian O'Connor; Leslie Pinnell; Jun Wang; Eric Gratz; Renata Arsenault; Yan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Leverage Surface Chemistry for High-Performance Triboelectric Nanogenerators.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Yongjiu Zou; Ardo Nashalian; Jun Chen
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.221

9.  Impact of technological innovation and regulation development on e-waste toxicity: a case study of waste mobile phones.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Mengjun Chen; Yungui Li; Bin Wang; Shu Chen; Zhonghui Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Nanoscale battery cathode materials induce DNA damage in bacteria.

Authors:  Tian A Qiu; Valeria Guidolin; Khoi Nguyen L Hoang; Thomas Pho; Andrea Carra'; Peter W Villalta; Jiayi He; Xiaoxiao Yao; Robert J Hamers; Silvia Balbo; Z Vivian Feng; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.