Literature DB >> 17438818

Leaching assessments of hazardous materials in cellular telephones.

John D Lincoln1, Oladele A Ogunseitan, Andrew A Shapiro, Jean-Daniel M Saphores.   

Abstract

Protocols for assessing the risks of discarded electronic products (e-waste) vary across jurisdictions, complicating the tasks of manufacturers and regulators. We compared the Federal Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), California's Waste Extraction Test (WET), and the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) on 34 phones to evaluate the consistency of hazardous waste classification. Our sample exceeded TCLP criteria only for lead (average 87.4 mg L(-1); range = 38.2-147.0 mg L(-1); regulatory limit = 5.0 mg L(-1), but failed TTLC for five metals: copper (average 203 g kg(-1); range = 186-224 g kg(-1); limit = 2.50 g kg(-1), nickel (9.25 g kg(-1); range = 6.34-11.20 g kg(-1); limit = 2.00 g kg(-1)), lead (10.14 g kg(-1); range = 8.2211.60 g kg(-1); limit = 1.00 g kg-1), antimony (1.02 g kg(-1); range = 0.86-1.29 g kg(-1); limit = 0.50 g kg(-1)), and zinc (11.01 g kg(-1); range = 8.82-12.80 g kg(-1); limit = 5.00 g kg(-1). Thresholds were not exceeded for WET. We detected several organic compounds, but at concentrations below standards. Brominated flame retardants were absent. These results improve existing environmental databases for e-waste and highlight the need to review regulatory testing for hazardous waste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438818     DOI: 10.1021/es0610479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Decision support for environmental management of industrial non-hazardous secondary materials: New analytical methods combined with simulation and optimization modeling.

Authors:  Keith W Little; Nadeesha H Koralegedara; Coleen M Northeim; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Pollution in the urban soils of Lianyungang, China, evaluated using a pollution index, mobility of heavy metals, and enzymatic activities.

Authors:  Yu Li; Hong-Guan Li; Fu-Cheng Liu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Potential environmental and human health impacts of rechargeable lithium batteries in electronic waste.

Authors:  Daniel Hsing Po Kang; Mengjun Chen; Oladele A Ogunseitan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Comprehensive planning for classification and disposal of solid waste at the industrial parks regarding health and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Hamidreza Pourzamani; Bahareh Rahmani Samani
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13

5.  Impact of technological innovation and regulation development on e-waste toxicity: a case study of waste mobile phones.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Mengjun Chen; Yungui Li; Bin Wang; Shu Chen; Zhonghui Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.