| Literature DB >> 23637864 |
Yanping Gong1, Haiying Xiao, Chunlin Li, Jie Bai, Xiaoling Cheng, Mengmeng Jin, Boruo Sun, Yanhui Lu, Yinghong Shao, Hui Tian.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between sex hormones and the risk of vascular disease in elderly men and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of testosterone replacement.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23637864 PMCID: PMC3634802 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Age distribution of vascular diseases.
The age range of the 60-year-old group was 60–69 years, of the 70-year-old age group was 70–79 years, of the 80-year-old group was 80–89 years and of the 90-year-old group was 90–91 years. The morbidity of CEVD, CAVD, TVD and EVD are shown as a percentage of each age group. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 versus the morbidity of vascular diseases in the 60-year-old group.
Characteristics of the sex hormones in the study population.
| n | Mean ± SD | Range | |
| FSH (IU/L) | 336 | 16.89±16.89 | 0.10–119.40 |
| LH (IU/L) | 336 | 9.42±6.29 | 0.10–45.69 |
| E2 (pmol/L) | 335 | 28.51±8.6 | 5.00–55.90 |
| E2/SHBG | 335 | 0.64±0.00 | 0.14–1.76 |
| FE2 | 335 | 0.59±0.27 | 0.17–1.88 |
| PROG (nmol/L) | 336 | 0.41±0.18 | 0.00–1.09 |
| TT (nmol/L) | 337 | 5.04±1.93 | 0.03–11.16 |
| T/E2 | 335 | 0.18±0.00 | 0.00–0.44 |
| FTI | 337 | 0.10±0.03 | 0.00–0.22 |
| TSI (nmol/IU) | 336 | 0.69±0.39 | 0.00–2.26 |
| FT (nmol/L) | 337 | 0.22±0.08 | 0.00–0.67 |
| BT (nmol/L) | 337 | 5.80±1.91 | 0.01–11.1 |
| PRL (μg/L) | 336 | 28.51±8.60 | 0.00–55.90 |
| SHBG (nmol/L) | 337 | 51.82±21.42 | 11.38–172.50 |
Figure 2Changes in sex hormones by age category.
The mean ± SD TT (nmol/L), FT (nmol/L), SHBG (nmol/L), E2 (pmol/L), FSH (IU/L), LH (IU/L), PROG (nmol/L), TSI (nmol/IU), FTI, T/E2 and E2/SHBG grouped by age are shown by curves. The age categories are the same as in Fig. 1. SHBG, FT and T/E2 increased with age (shown by filled symbols), but the others declined (shown with hollow symbols). FSH, LH, SHBG, FT, FTI, TSI, FE2, E2/SHBG and PROG had a linear relationship with age, and the R2 values of their linear equations were 0.92, 0.94, 0.97, 0.88, 0.99, 0.92, 0.85, 0.96 and 0.90. Significant differences between age groups (P<0.01) were observed in FSH, LH, SHBG, FTI, TSI, FE2, and E2/SHBG.
The differences in sex hormone levels after grouping the subjects by vascular disease.
| VD | TT | FT | BT | T/E2 | E2 | E2/SHBG | FE2 | PROG | LH | FSH | FTI | TSI | SHBG | |
| Control (n = 150) | A | 5.19±1.83 | 0.22±0.08 | 5.15±1.81 | 0.19±0.06 | 29.24±8.45 | 0.68±0.32 | 0.60±0.28 | 274.45±166.13 | 8.45±4.90 | 13.84±14.19 | 0.11±0.03 | 0.76±0.41 | 49.64±21.58 |
| B | 5.16±0.16 | 0.22±0.01 | 5.13±0.16 | 0.19±0.01 | 29.14±0.71 | 0.65±0.03 | 0.60±0.28 | 275.05±11.24 | 9.39±0.49 | 16.32±1.29 | 0.11±0.09 | 0.72±0.03 | 51.63±1.67 | |
| CEVD (n = 31) | A | 5.02±1.90 | 0.25±0.14 | 4.97±1.89 | 0.19±0.09 | 27.23±7.97 | 0.58±0.29 | 0.50±0.21* | 218.51±77.61 | 11.28±8.83* | 21.65±22.15* | 0.10±0.03* | 0.64±0.42 | 55.32±22.32 |
| B | 5.06±0.35 | 0.25±0.02 | 4.99±0.35 | 0.19±0.01 | 27.34±1.54 | 0.61±0.06 | 0.50±0.02 | 217.54±24.73 | 10.55±1.07 | 19.57±2.84 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.68±0.07 | 53.24±3.67 | |
| CAVD (n = 101) | A | 5.19±1.82* | 0.21±0.08* | 4.96±1.87* | 0.18±0.07 | 28.40±8.10 | 0.64±0.30 | 0.52±0.21 | 243.71±116.04 | 9.37±6.23 | 17.29±16.81 | 0.10±0.03* | 0.66±0.35* | 49.75±18.29 |
| B | 4.94±0.19 | 0.21±0.01 | 4.94±0.19 | 0.18±0.01 | 28.44±0.84 | 0.65±0.03 | 0.51±0.02 | 242.96±13.44 | 9.17±0.58 | 17.01±1.54 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.68±0.04 | 49.03±2.01 | |
| TVD (n = 54) | A | 5.03±2.02 | 0.21±0.09 | 4.99±1.99 | 0.18±0.08 | 28.51±8.87 | 0.58±0.30* | 0.52±0.23 | 225.45±166.13* | 10.89±6.64** | 20.70±17.30** | 0.09±0.03** | 0.61±0.37* | 57.86±22.66 |
| B | 5.01±0.27 | 0.21±0.01 | 4.94±0.27 | 0.18±0.01 | 28.60±1.17 | 0.62±0.04 | 0.51±0.02 | 227.18±18.93 | 9.52±0.82 | 17.08±2.17 | 0.10±0.00 | 0.61±0.05 | 54.56±2.81 | |
| EVD (n = 183) | A | 5.00±1.93 | 0.22±0.10 | 4.95±1.91 | 0.18±0.08 | 28.24±8.27 | 0.64±0.31* | 0.52±0.22 | 234.34±101.73** | 10.12±6.84* | 18.98±17.91** | 0.10±0.03** | 0.64±0.37** | 52.98±20.52 |
| B | 4.98±0.14 | 0.22±0.01 | 4.95±0.14 | 0.18±0.01 | 28.31±0.63 | 0.63±0.02 | 0.51±0.02 | 234.47±10.12 | 9.49±0.44 | 17.45±1.16 | 0.10±0.00 | 0.67±0.03 | 51.26±1.51 |
VD: vascular diseases; CEVD: cerebrovascular disease; CAVD: cardiovascular disease; TVD: both CEVD and CAVD; EVD: more than one type of vascular diseases.
A represents the difference in sex hormone levels in patients with various vascular diseases without adjusting for age and smoke.
B represents the difference in sex hormone levels in patients with various vascular diseases after adjusting for age and smoke.
Logistic regression analyses of cerebrovascular disease.
| PROG | FT | FE2 | E2/SHBG | T/E2 | LH | Age | MetS | C-peptide | ||
| model 1 | ||||||||||
| sig | 0.05 | 0.05 | ||||||||
| exp(B) | 1 | 75.71 | ||||||||
| 95%C.I. | 0.99–1.02 | 1.10–>1000 | ||||||||
| model 2 | ||||||||||
| sig | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.05 | |||||||
| exp(B) | 1.0 | 45.16 | 1.058 | |||||||
| 95%C.I. | 0.99–1.00 | 0.58–3494 | 1.01–1.12 | |||||||
| model 3 | ||||||||||
| sig | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.58 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.022 | |||
| exp(B) | 1 | >1000 | 0.00 | 166.65 | 1.07 | 1.03 | 4.24 | |||
| 95%C.I. | 0.99 –1.00 | 4.17–>1000 | 0.00–0.69 | 0.84–>1000 | 0.99–1.15 | 0.97–1.11 | 1.23–14.67 | |||
| model 4 | ||||||||||
| sig | 0.07 | 0.41 | 0.106 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||
| exp(B) | 1 | >1000 | 0.21 | >1000 | 1.10 | 4.09 | ||||
| 95%C.I. | 0.99 –1.00 | <0.01–>1000 | 0.16–1.52 | 0.95–>1000 | 1.00–1.28 | 1.14–14.68 | ||||
Model 1: all sex hormones were included in the regression equation.
Model 2: all sex hormones and age were included in the regression equation.
Model 3: all sex hormones, age, all metabolic categorical variables and hepatic/renal function were included in the regression equation.
Model 4: all sex hormones, age, all metabolic continuous variables and hepatic/renal function were included in the regression equation.
Figure 3Trend lines of FT, FE2, and T/E2 and CEVD in elderly men.
ROC curves of FT, FE2 and T/E2 are shown in 3A. Using men in quartile 1 (Q1) as a reference, the risk of CEVD of Q2, Q3, and Q4 are shown in Fig. 3B–D. “Q4:Q1–3” means the risk of CEVD of Q4 compared to the pool of Q1–3. We divided quartiles 2–4 of FE2, FT and T/E2 into 8, 8 and 6 groups by increments of 0.05 pmol/L, 0.02 nmol/L and 0.01 units, respectively (10 to 20 people per group). The trend lines and equations are shown in Fig. 3E–G.
Figure 4The balance of T/E2 in elder men.
Better CEVD protection was observed when FE2 was higher than 7.5 pmol/L. At the same time, the patient should be kept in the proper ranges of FT and T/E2. The balance between T and E2 may be more important than their absolute quantities.