OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether the relationship between hypertension, other cardiac risk factors, and coronary artery disease (CAD) is modulated by menopausal status and/or age. BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of age versus menopausal status in the development of CAD in women remains unclear. METHODS: We compared systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and traditional cardiac risk factors for CAD in premenopausal (n = 123) and postmenopausal (n = 482) women undergoing coronary angiography for suspected ischemia. To assess the relative contribution of age versus menopausal status, we fit a hypertension-menopausal status interaction term and adjusted for age. RESULTS: There were similar relationships with regard to traditional coronary risk factors and angiographic CAD in premenopausal versus postmenopausal women, with few exceptions. Twenty percent of premenopausal women had angiographic CAD versus 31% of postmenopausal women (p = 0.02). Premenopausal women had lower mean (standard deviation) SBP (132 [25] vs. 139 [20] mm Hg; p < 0.0001) and lower PP (54 [18] vs. 62 [18] mm Hg; p < 0.0001) compared to postmenopausal women; however, multivariable analyses revealed that SBP was a risk factor for CAD in premenopausal (p = 0.002) but not postmenopausal women (p = 0.13), and regression slopes were significantly different (p = 0.04). This interaction effect remained after age adjustment, suggesting independent risk contribution from both age and menopausal status. A similar slope difference was observed for PP (p = 0.03) but not for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing angiography for suspected ischemia, elevated SBP and PP are potent risk factors in premenopausal women. The results suggest that identification of hypertension in premenopausal women dictates additional CAD risk factor assessment and management.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether the relationship between hypertension, other cardiac risk factors, and coronary artery disease (CAD) is modulated by menopausal status and/or age. BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of age versus menopausal status in the development of CAD in women remains unclear. METHODS: We compared systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and traditional cardiac risk factors for CAD in premenopausal (n = 123) and postmenopausal (n = 482) women undergoing coronary angiography for suspected ischemia. To assess the relative contribution of age versus menopausal status, we fit a hypertension-menopausal status interaction term and adjusted for age. RESULTS: There were similar relationships with regard to traditional coronary risk factors and angiographic CAD in premenopausal versus postmenopausal women, with few exceptions. Twenty percent of premenopausal women had angiographic CAD versus 31% of postmenopausal women (p = 0.02). Premenopausal women had lower mean (standard deviation) SBP (132 [25] vs. 139 [20] mm Hg; p < 0.0001) and lower PP (54 [18] vs. 62 [18] mm Hg; p < 0.0001) compared to postmenopausal women; however, multivariable analyses revealed that SBP was a risk factor for CAD in premenopausal (p = 0.002) but not postmenopausal women (p = 0.13), and regression slopes were significantly different (p = 0.04). This interaction effect remained after age adjustment, suggesting independent risk contribution from both age and menopausal status. A similar slope difference was observed for PP (p = 0.03) but not for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing angiography for suspected ischemia, elevated SBP and PP are potent risk factors in premenopausal women. The results suggest that identification of hypertension in premenopausal women dictates additional CAD risk factor assessment and management.
Authors: Mjs Muchanga; F B Lepira; R Tozin; E P Mbelambela; N R Ngatu; E K Sumaili; J R Makulo; N Suganuma Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Nanette K Wenger; Anita Arnold; C Noel Bairey Merz; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Keith C Ferdinand; Jerome L Fleg; Martha Gulati; Ijeoma Isiadinso; Dipti Itchhaporia; KellyAnn Light-McGroary; Kathryn J Lindley; Jennifer H Mieres; Mary L Rosser; George R Saade; Mary Norine Walsh; Carl J Pepine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Megha Agarwal; Chrisandra Shufelt; Puja K Mehta; Edward Gill; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li; Behzad Sharif; Ning Li; C Noel Bairey Merz; Louise E J Thomson Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2013-09
Authors: Leonardo de Souza Mendonça; Caroline Fernandes-Santos; Carlos Alberto Mandarim-de-Lacerda Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Denis Babici; Raymond K Kudej; Tara McNulty; Jie Zhang; Marko Oydanich; Tolga Berkman; Koichi Nishimura; Sanford P Bishop; Dorothy E Vatner; Stephen F Vatner Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.733