Literature DB >> 23637700

Altered expression of RNA splicing proteins in Alzheimer's disease patients: evidence from two microarray studies.

Jenny Wong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dysregulation of pre-mRNA splicing from an altered expression of RNA splice-regulatory proteins may act as the convergence point underlying aberrant gene expression changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD).
METHODS: Two microarray datasets from a control/AD postmortem brain cohort of 31 subjects - 9 controls and 22 AD subjects (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database) - were used.
RESULTS: Between the two microarray studies, the expression of six splice-regulatory protein genes showed concordant changes in AD. These genes were then correlated with gene expression changes of transcripts reported to be altered in AD. Amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein and tropomyosin receptor kinase B transcripts were found to correlate significantly with the same splice-regulatory proteins in the two studies.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights a susceptibility network that can potentially link a number of susceptibility genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative splicing; Alzheimer's disease; Brain tissue, postmortem; Gene expression; Hippocampus; Microarray

Year:  2013        PMID: 23637700      PMCID: PMC3617979          DOI: 10.1159/000348406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra        ISSN: 1664-5464


Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia accounting for between 50 and 70% of cases globally [1,2]. The presence of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, extracellular neuritic plaques, and brain-wide neurodegeneration are key pathological features which define AD [3]. Other pathological processes associated with AD include altered levels of neurotransmitter receptor expression [4] as well as dysregulation of cell signaling [5,6,7], inflammatory response [8,9], synaptic transmission [10,11,12], and cholesterol metabolism [13,14]. At present, a complete understanding of the underlying causes of these pathogenic processes remains elusive. It is predicted that there is a common underlying process that is dysregulated in AD, which serves as a convergence point that links the multitude of dysfunctional signatures. Alternative splicing is a widespread gene-regulatory process by which exons of primary transcripts (pre-mRNAs) are spliced into different arrangements to produce structurally distinct mRNA variants. This mechanism of gene product diversification plays a critical role in controlling cellular differentiation and development in response to environmental, temporal, or cell type-specific cues [15,16]. It is estimated that more than 75% of genes in the human genome are alternatively spliced [17]. Dysregulation in alternative splicing has been linked to a number of human diseases including some neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism) [18]. However, in AD, few studies have investigated the link between alternative splicing dysregulation, aberrant splice-regulatory protein expression, and AD progression. In a recent study, it has been found that generation of the tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) alternative transcript TrkB-Shc is regulated by the serine/arginine protein Srp20, and that biochemical manipulation of its expression in neuronal cell lines and exposure of cells to amyloidogenic factors could modulate TrkB pre-mRNA splicing and TrkB-Shc expression [19]. In other dementias, alterations in the levels of splice-regulatory protein expression have been shown to affect alternative splicing in frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism. For instance, in humans, alterations in adult-specific tau exon 10 splicing have been demonstrated to lead to abnormal ratios of tau isoform expression [20,21,22]. Considering that one splice-regulatory protein is capable of regulating the splicing of multiple pre-mRNAs, it is hypothesized that dysregulation of pre-mRNA splicing from the altered expression of key splice-regulatory proteins in AD may underlie the aberrant changes in gene expression in multiple AD-affected pathways during disease progression.

Materials and Methods

Datasets

The hippocampal CA1 microarray datasets derived from postmortem brain tissue from a total of 31 subjects − 9 controls and 22 AD subjects – of varying AD severity (n = 7 incipient, n = 8 moderate, and n = 7 severe) were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Affymetrix GeneChip (HG-U133A); accession GDS810 [23] and GSE28146 [24]). Cohort demographics are listed in table 1.
Table 1

Cohort demographics

GenderAge, years
Control 976male85
Control 1003male80
Control 1008female92
Control 1012male80
Control 1015male75
Control 1018female97
Control 1030male95
Control 1039male77a
Control 1040male87
Incipient 715female101
Incipient 720female95
Incipient 994female83
Incipient 1019male88
Incipient 1029female91
Incipient 1034male88
Incipient 1043female97
Moderate 826female85
Moderate 832female89
Moderate 856female83
Moderate 965female82
Moderate 1020female79
Moderate 1025male81
Moderate 1031female86
Moderate 1037male82
Severe 701male85
Severe 723female65
Severe 807male93
Severe 819female79
Severe 867female94
Severe 872female79
Severe 1036female93

Control 1039 is excluded in the GSE28146 microarray.

To determine whether there are changes in splice-regulatory protein gene expression during AD progression, expression profiles of all genes involved in RNA splicing were collated from the GDS810 microarray. Genes that were statistically significant by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a p value <0.05 or showed a trend towards statistical significance with a p value range between 0.05 and 0.1 were then mined from the GSE28146 microarray. Considering that a specific group of genes were to be assessed, all gene expression profiles were included, even those with low expression.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using Statistica 7 (StatSoft Inc., 2000, Statistica for Windows). One-way ANOVA was conducted to assess changes in gene expression during AD progression. ANOVAs were followed up with the Fisher LSD post hoc analysis to assess significance in gene expression between AD severity groups. Pearson's product moment correlations were used to determine whether any relationship existed between splice-regulatory protein gene expression and the expression of AD susceptibility genes. A p value <0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Results

In this current report, two publically available microarray datasets from a control/AD hippocampal brain cohort from the NCBI GEO database (Affymetrix GeneChip (HG-U133A); accession GDS810 [23] and GSE28146 [24]) were utilized. In both studies [23,24], the expression of genes significantly altered in AD was classified into functional categories and biological pathways of the gene ontology consortium (www.geneontology.org). However, a specific category for genes involved in RNA splicing was not described and genes involved in RNA splicing were likely grouped into other gene ontology categories. Thus, to determine whether genes involved in RNA splicing are altered during AD progression, genes whose gene products are known to be involved (either directly or indirectly) in RNA splicing were screened.

GDS810 Microarray

The GDS810 microarray published by Blalock et al. [23] assessed gene expression changes in the hippocampal CA1 subfield from a total of 31 subjects − 9 controls and 22 AD subjects – of varying AD severity. A total of 22,286 genes were tested and of these, 499 were involved in RNA splicing. Of the 499 genes, only 45 were found to be altered from the incipient stage of AD to the severe stage (table 2). Specifically, 6 of the 45 genes identified were significantly changed in subjects with incipient AD. Interestingly, hnrnpA3 was the only gene that showed a significant decrease in expression, whereas NUDT21, LSM5, hnrnpUL1, RBM8A, and RBMY1J were significantly increased in expression. In subjects with moderate AD, the expression of 18 genes was found to be significantly altered compared to controls. Of these, 5 genes were significantly decreased, whereas 13 genes were significantly increased. In subjects with severe AD, 21 genes were found to be significantly changed compared to controls. Of these, 6 genes showed a significantly reduced expression, whereas 15 showed a significantly increased expression.
Table 2

Microarray gene expression changes in the CA1 hippocampus (p < 0.05; GDS810 microarray)

ProbeGeneDescriptionControlIncipientModerateSevereANOVA FANOVA p
206809_s_atHNRNPA3heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3461.2 ± 62.2305.9 ± 48.3362.1 ± 53222.1 ± 38.43.630.03a
208713_atHNRNPUL1heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U-like 1610.9 ± 39.4809.7 ± 72.7757.5 ± 38.8836.6 ± 673.730.02a
202903_atLSM5U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm5108.8 ± 10.6167.5 ± 19.9162.5 ± 7.9186.5 ± 29.83.790.02a
202697_atNUDT21nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X135.4 ± 10.8188.6 ± 14.2136 ± 14141.2 ± 14.43.540.03a
213852_atRBM8ARNA-binding motif protein 8A1,490.1 ± 72.11,899.7 ± 1041,806 ± 80.11,887.6 ± 173.13.390.03a
216842_x_atRBMY1JRNA-binding motif protein, Y-linked, family 1, member J144.1 ± 19.4275.9 ± 42.7156.5 ± 26.7232.1 ± 48.33.370.03a
207842_s_atCASC3cancer susceptibility candidate 31,372.3 ± 115.21,646.7 ± 183.42,256.4 ± 256.32,198.7 ± 212.35.120.006b
203376_atCDC40cell division cycle 40 homolog1,291.1 ± 84.11,174.3 ± 91.9913.5 ± 73.41,033.8 ± 67.74.460.01b
201077_s_atNHP2L1nonhistone chromosome protein 2-like 11,995.8 ± 74.21,764 ± 105.51,599.1 ± 42.91,487.1 ± 107.87.390.0009b
200057_s_atNONOnon-POU domain-containing octamer binding3,671.8 ± 98.93,872.7 ± 103.94,017.1 ± 164.84,171.8 ± 110.53.070.04b
202635_s_atPOLR2Kpolymerase (RNA) II (DNA-directed) polypeptide K, 7.0 kDa465.9 ± 61.3367.5 ± 44.5253.2 ± 22.6409.4 ± 46.23.850.02b
208652_atPPP2CAserine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit alpha isoform3,154.9 ± 298.82,558.9 ± 234.32,255.6 ± 130.11,840.5 ± 278.65.150.006b
221547_atPRPF18PRP18 pre-mRNA processing factor 18 homolog220 ± 15.2239 ± 11.9161.4 ± 17.1258.2 ± 216.250.002b
218053_atPRPF40APRP40 pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog A876 ± 73.5979.3 ± 631,334.4 ± 125.61,193.6 ± 79.95.540.004b
211270_x_atPTBP1polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1565.9 ± 50.9683.1 ± 78.9850.1 ± 87.4870.1 ± 764.10.02b
211271_x_atPTBP1polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1491.9 ± 36.7568.4 ± 84.5772.8 ± 72.8654.6 ± 57.23.910.02b
212015_x_atPTBP1polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1362.4 ± 28.4388.6 ± 67.6536.2 ± 44.8448.3 ± 40.23.040.046b
216306_x_atPTBP1polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1655 ± 76.3762.9 ± 66.61,021.3 ± 100.7962.4 ± 90.44.260.01b
212262_atQKIhomolog of mouse quaking QKI534.1 ± 33.4673.4 ± 56.8758.8 ± 46.4820.6 ± 100.24.490.01b
212636_atQKIhomolog of mouse quaking QKI7,246.6 ± 762.99,010.5 ± 882.511,098.5 ± 793.310,982.3 ± 1262.14.240.01b
215089_s_atRBM10RNA-binding motif protein 10261.3 ± 48.8219.1 ± 47.1463.6 ± 48.3314.2 ± 84.73.450.03b
207941_s_atRBM39RNA-binding motif protein 393,192.2 ± 118.63,276.6 ± 2634,108.2 ± 117.83,436.4 ± 238.75.320.005b
219507_atRSRC1arginine/serine-rich coiled-coil 166.8 ± 12.985.2 ± 18.1123.3 ± 8.45159.6 ± 30.85.10.006b
221768_atSFPQsplicing factor proline/ glutamine rich794.7 ± 40.6861.6 ± 83.51,137.9 ± 126.6780.4 ± 104.93.370.03b
216364_s_atAFF2AF4/FMR2 family, member 215.2 ± 1.9624.1 ± 4.2623.1 ± 6.5665.9 ± 23.53.920.02c
203809_s_atAKT2RAC-beta serine/threonine-protein kinase64.4 ± 13.975.9 ± 9.379.9 ± 11.6131 ± 204.160.02c
202256_atCD2BP2CD2 (cytoplasmic tail)-binding protein 2365 ± 20.1381.7 ± 34.1411.4 ± 28.2522.8 ± 43.44.980.007c
209056_s_atCDC5Lcell division cycle 5-like protein676.3 ± 36.6623.8 ± 48.4578.1 ± 25.7492.2 ± 40.94.210.01c
219539_atGEMIN6gem (nuclear organelle)-associated protein 6143.5 ± 18.9130.8 ± 14.7174 ± 15.4214.5 ± 26.53.50.03c
210588_x_atHNRNPH3heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H3486.2 ± 39.8578.9 ± 62.8424.5 ± 34.7689.7 ± 92.53.820.02c
202072_atHNRNPLheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L692.3 ± 82.2746.9 ± 99694.9 ± 63.6380 ± 81.33.860.02c
220764_atLOC100132773serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4-regulatory subunit 2-like50 ± 13.921.1 ± 9.3362.5 ± 15.496.8 ± 25.33.250.04c
217415_atPOLR2Apolymerase (RNA) II (DNA-directed) polypeptide A, 220 kDa76.1 ± 13.356.8 ± 14.381 ± 14.2136 ± 26.63.550.03c
202634_atPOLR2Kpolymerase (RNA) II (DNA-directed) polypeptide K, 7.0 kDa850 ± 66.5836.7 ± 57.5789.2 ± 34.9590.1 ± 68.83.950.02c
202494_atPPIEpeptidylprolyl isomerase E (cyclophilin E)206.1 ± 16.9281.4 ± 53.7262 ± 18.9360.4 ± 40.73.70.02c
203103_s_atPRPF19PRP19/PSO4 pre-mRNA-processing factor 19 homolog1,384.9 ± 112.71,182.1 ± 119.71,138.3 ± 89.3879.1 ± 86.84.010.02c
218088_s_atRRAGCRas-related GTP-binding C1,081.5 ± 52.41,013.4 ± 82.11,218.4 ± 67.11,411.2 ± 69.26.430.002c
201070_x_atSF3B1splicing factor 3b, subunit 1, 155 kDa501.4 ± 44.3517.2 ± 28.9536.4 ± 53.8829.1 ± 163.43.270.04c
217608_atSFRS12IP1SREK1-interacting protein 168.4 ± 6.1362.8 ± 10.186.7 ± 13.1122.1 ± 12.66.020.003c
218493_atSNRNP25small nuclear ribonucleoprotein, 25 kDa (U11/U12)1,080.4 ± 831,070.7 ± 113.31,019.8 ± 59.2714.5 ± 41.74.520.01c
200826_atSNRPD2small nuclear ribonucleoprotein D2 polypeptide, 16.5 kDa2,611.4 ± 942,699 ± 193.72,648.4 ± 106.62,012.6 ± 251.43.640.03c
211439_atSRSF7serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 7 (9G8)137.5 ± 19.8199.5 ± 43.3124.1 ± 11.9235.7 ± 31.43.610.03c
210180_s_atTRA2Btransformer-2 protein homolog beta22.2 ± 4.976.97 ± 1.0616.9 ± 6.2734.6 ± 9.263.30.04c
206067_s_atWT1Wilms tumor 18.11 ± 1.4612.1 ± 3.6313.3 ± 3.2621.1 ± 3.383.410.03c
214759_atWTAPWilms tumor 1-associated protein142.9 ± 25.7174.5 ± 19.6130 ± 12216.4 ± 262.990.049c

Incipient p < 0.05 (Fisher LSD);

moderate p < 0.05 (Fisher LSD);

severe p < 0.05 (Fisher LSD).

It is worth noting that while 45 genes were found to be significantly altered during AD progression, the expression of 34 genes trended towards statistical significance (one-way ANOVA: 0.05 < p < 0.1) (table 3). Of these, 11 were decreased in expression and 23 were increased in expression.
Table 3

Microarray gene expression changes in the CA1 hippocampus (0.05 < p < 0.1; GDS810 microarray)

ProbeGeneDescriptionControlIncipientModerateSevereANOVA FANOVA p
200041_s_atBATIspliceosome RNA helicase DDX39B2,839.2 ± 220.53,233.4 ± 2493,948.7 ± 2743,076.4 ± 412.22.90.05a
209055_s_atCDC5Lcell division cycle 5-like protein130.2 ± 19.2256.1 ± 66.6126.1 ± 21.6149.1 ± 35.92.530.08a
215045_atCELF3CUGBP, Elav-like family member 3631.6 ± 98.2537 ± 59.6669.9 ± 87389.9 ± 43.42.330.1a
203947_atCSTF3cleavage stimulation factor, 3′ pre-RNA, subunit 3, 77 kDa802 ± 58.7786.8 ± 65.6740.2 ± 68.91,000 ± 98.52.340.1a
219149_x_atDBR1debranching enzyme homolog 1129.2 ± 11.6173.5 ± 15.8171 ± 9.40172.3 ± 18.22.730.06a
219121_s_atESRP1epithelial splicing-regulatory protein 173.9 ± 19.540.1 ± 7.5131.7 ± 3.7281.4 ± 21.82.470.08a
200959_atFUSfused in sarcoma797.9 ± 56.5999.8 ± 59.8821.5 ± 32.5841.9 ± 73.82.50.08a
215744_atFUSfused in sarcoma127.3 ± 14.988.3 ± 21.6122.8 ± 11.8160.7 ± 26.12.30.1a
202354_s_atGTF2F1general transcription factor IIF, polypeptide 1, 74 kDa95.5 ± 15.5144.4 ± 2075.2 ± 21.980 ± 19.52.530.08a
35201_atHNRNPLheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L1,963.2 ± 1582,212 ± 1712,120.6 ± 118.21,689.6 ± 84.32.450.09a
214918_atHNRNPMheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein M66.1 ± 10.272.8 ± 16.790.9 ± 21.3136.3 ± 272.660.07a
219814_atMBNL3muscleblind-like 333.5 ± 9.7013.5 ± 3.4542 ± 1667.5 ± 20.92.390.09a
212718_atPAPOLApoly(A) polymerase alpha2,442.8 ± 240.92,252.2 ± 428.92,644.5 ± 251.43,686 ± 610.52.550.08a
203378_atPCF11cleavage and polyadenylation factor subunit, homolog491 ± 41.8533.8 ± 55.3673.7 ± 50.7547.9 ± 46.12.810.06a
210183_x_atPNNpinin, desmosome-associated protein4,076.8 ± 556.73,036.2 ± 149.64,261.8 ± 184.93,148 ± 358.92.650.07a
214144_atPOLR2Dpolymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide D161.8 ± 14.8131.9 ± 7.06136.3 ± 13.4182.6 ± 19.52.50.08a
221649_s_atPPANpeter pan homolog173.8 ± 10.5152.8 ± 13.8169.7 ± 18249.6 ± 50.52.510.08a
220553_s_atPRPF39PRP39 pre-mRNA processing factor 39 homolog530 ± 46.5481.7 ± 40.3535.7 ± 45.5381.3 ± 47.92.350.09a
202126_atPRPF4BPRP4 pre-mRNA processing factor 4 homolog B1,002.1 ± 52.71,075.9 ± 40.81,159.1 ± 62.61,198.6 ± 71.72.370.09a
217857_s_atRBM8ARNA-binding motif protein 8A22.1 ± 4.4442.5 ± 10.834.6 ± 11.811.5 ± 1.012.560.08a
208307_atRBMY1JRNA-binding motif protein, Y-linked, family 1, member J26.5 ± 5.1233 ± 14.239.3 ± 9.5478.7 ± 26.82.410.09a
209381_x_atSF3A2splicing factor 3a, subunit 2, 66 kDa172.1 ± 41.3223.2 ± 58.3368.3 ± 62.7515.8 ± 179.22.690.07a
221263_s_atSF3B5splicing factor 3b, subunit 5, 10 kDa1,134.9 ± 70.8955.7 ± 73.6914.9 ± 291,011.1 ± 72.12.460.08a
213505_s_atSFRS14putative splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 14832.2 ± 47.1779.5 ± 51749.8 ± 67.8630.4 ± 38.62.550.08a
204978_atSFRS16splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 16949.1 ± 114.71,131.2 ± 161.51,134.6 ± 118.21,803.3 ± 405.12.920.05a
212438_atSNRNP27small nuclear ribonucleoprotein, 27 kDa (U4/U6.U5)690.8 ± 102.8451.6 ± 21.4410.5 ± 31.7586.9 ± 111.12.720.06a
215722_s_atSNRPA1small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide A′232 ± 11.7296.7 ± 33.1236.5 ± 19.6205.4 ± 31.12.40.09a
208821_atSNRPBsmall nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptides B and B1337.4 ± 28.8326.6 ± 15.5284 ± 26.3415.6 ± 59.52.330.1a
208610_s_atSRRM2serine/arginine repetitive matrix 2922.4 ± 118.41,019.6 ± 110.71,177.7 ± 148.31,986.8 ± 6112.530.08a
206989_s_atSRSF2IPSR-related CTD-associated factor 11449.9 ± 27.2563.6 ± 42.9572 ± 41.3486.7 ± 35.92.770.06a
201129_atSRSF7serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 7 (9G8)1,286.8 ± 76.11,001 ± 79.41,048 ± 100.71,008.9 ± 109.52.370.09a
202553_s_atSYF2SYF2 homolog, RNA splicing factor998 ± 901,163.6 ± 71.51,307.8 ± 75.31,189.4 ± 67.72.870.06a
200020_atTARDBPTAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43)1,269.4 ± 60.21,455.1 ± 135.51,201.1 ± 53.41,592.9 ± 176.92.580.08a
214814_atYTHDC1YTH domain containing 172.1 ± 13.8118.9 ± 14.294 ± 14.4131.5 ± 22.62.70.07a
202126_atPRPF4BPRP4 pre-mRNA processing factor 4 homolog B2,050.7 ± 211.21,330.4 ± 124.92,149.5 ± 267.12,313 ± 353.52.80.06b
200020_atTARDBPTAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43)4,252.9 ± 372.44,204.2 ± 262.53,107.2 ± 229.74,109.3 ± 4882.560.08b

GDS810 microarray.

GSE28146 microarray.

GSE28146 Microarray

In the GSE28146 microarray published by Blalock et al. [24], grey matter of the hippocampal CA1 subfield was selectively isolated using laser capture microdissection from the same subjects and analyzed for gene expression changes. Using this dataset, the expression of splice-regulatory proteins that were significantly altered or showed a trend towards statistical significance in AD in the GDS810 microarray was screened to determine whether changes in gene expression were specific to the grey matter. Of the 45 genes that were significantly changed throughout the course of AD in the GDS810 microarray study, only QKI, PTBP1, and SFPQ were significantly altered in the GSE28146 microarray (table 4). Of the 34 genes that trended towards significance in the GDS810 microarray study, SRSF7, SFRS16, and YTHDC1 were found to be significantly changed in the GSE28146 study.
Table 4

Microarray gene expression changes in the CA1 hippocampus (grey matter laser capture microdissection; GSE28146 microarray)

ProbeGeneControlIncipientModerateSevereANOVA FANOVA p
212262_atQKI534.1 ± 33.4673.4 ± 56.8758.8 ± 46.4820.6 ± 100.23.450.03a
211271_x_atPTBP1491.9 ± 36.7568.4 ± 84.5772.8 ± 72.8654.6 ± 57.23.480.03b
221768_atSFPQ794.7 ± 40.6861.6 ± 83.51,137.9 ± 126.6780.4 ± 104.93.950.02b
201129_atSRSF71,286.8 ± 76.11,001 ± 79.41,048 ± 100.71,008.9 ± 109.53.790.02b
204978_atSFRS16949.1 ± 14.71,131.2 ± 161.51,134.6 ± 118.21,803.3 ± 405.13.50.03b
214814_atYTHDC172.1 ± 13.8118.9 ± 14.294 ± 14.4131.5 ± 22.65.590.004c

Incipient p < 0.05 (Fisher LSD);

moderate p < 0.05 (Fisher LSD);

severe p < 0.05 (Fisher LSD).

It was next determined whether the splice-regulatory proteins found to be significantly altered in both the GDS810 and GSE28146 microarray studies correlated in their gene expression pattern over the disease duration. Interestingly, QKI and SRSF7 were the only two genes showing concordance (table 5).
Table 5

Correlations: splice-regulatory protein gene expression

rp
PTBP1 (GSE28146] PTBP1 (GDS810)0.360.05
QKI (GSE28146) QKI (GDS810)0.480.01a
SFPQ (GSE28146) SFPQ (GDS810)0.180.35
SRSF7 (GSE28146) SRSF7 (GDS810)0.500.01a
SFRS16 (GSE28146) SFRS16 (GDS810)–0.150.42
YTHDC1 (GSE28146) YTHDC1 (GDS810)0.110.57

p < 0.05.

Gene Expression Correlations between Splice-Regulatory Proteins and AD Susceptibility Genes

Next, it was determined whether changes in splice-regulatory protein expression found to be significant in both the GDS810 and GSE28146 microarray studies correlated with gene expression changes of various transcripts reported to be altered in AD. These included progranulin (GRN), microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), presenilin-1 (PSEN1), presenilin-2 (PSEN2), presenilin enhancer protein 2 (PSENEN), amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein (APP), apolipoprotein E (APOE), TrkB (NTRK2), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [25,26,27,28,29]. While the expression of most transcripts correlated with expression levels of the splice-regulatory proteins in their respective studies, only APP and TrkB transcripts correlated significantly with the same splice-regulatory proteins in the two studies (tables 6, 7). Two APP transcripts showed significant positive correlations with YTHDC1, whereas one transcript showed a negative correlation. The TrkB transcripts showing significant correlations with splice-regulatory protein expression were those encoding the C-terminal truncated TrkB isoform TrkB-TK-. TrkB-TK- transcripts correlated negatively with SRSF7 and SFRS16 but positively with SFPQ expression throughout AD progression.
Table 6

Correlations: splice-regulatory proteins and AD susceptibility gene transcripts (GDS810)

rp
PSEN1, QKI0.470.01
MAPT, SFRS16–0.440.01
PSEN2, QKI0.530.002
PSEN2, SRSF7–0.420.02
PSEN2, SRSF7–0.450.01
BDNF, SFPQ–0.410.03
NTRK2, SFRS160.610.0003a
NTRK2, YTHDC10.550.002
PSEN1, SFRS16–0.390.03
APP, QKI0.490.01
APP, SRSF7–0.460.01
APP, SFRS160.870.0000000003
APP, YTHDC10.640.0001a
GRN, PTBP10.390.03
NTRK2, SFRS16–0.650.0001a
APP, SFRS16–0.540.002
APP, YTHDC1–0.380.04a
GRN, QKI0.400.03
PSENEN, SFRS16–0.550.002
NTRK2, SRSF7–0.430.02a
NTRK2, SFPQ0.360.05a
NTRK2, SFRS16–0.440.01a

p < 0.05 in GDS810 and GSE28146 microarrays.

Table 7

Correlations: splice-regulatory proteins and AD susceptibility gene transcripts (GSE28146)

rp
GRN, SFPQ–0.450.01
APOE, PTBP10.370.05
PSEN1, SFPQ0.480.01
MAPT, SFPQ–0.630.0002
NTRK2, QKI–0.470.01
PSEN1, SFPQ0.370.05
APP, YTHDC10.490.01a
GRN, YTHDC10.440.01
NTRK2, SRSF7–0.440.02a
NTRK2, QKI0.440.01
NTRK2, SFRS16–0.410.03a
NTRK2, SFPQ0.390.03a
NTRK2, SRSF7–0.520.003a

p < 0.05 in GDS810 and GSE28146 microarrays.

Discussion

In the two microarray datasets utilized in this study, most changes in gene expression were found to occur during the moderate to severe stages of AD, periods coinciding with gross pathological brain changes and cognitive decline [30], whereas fewer changes occurred during the incipient stage of AD. Interestingly, of the 45 splice-regulatory proteins whose gene expression was found to be significantly altered in the GDS810 microarray study, only 6 were significant in the GSE28146 study; moreover, these significant changes in gene expression occurred during the incipient stages of AD. This finding suggests that changes in splice-regulatory protein expression may occur in the grey matter early in the disease process, prior to gross pathological brain changes. Indeed, when the GDS810 and GSE28146 microarrays were assessed to determine whether those splicing proteins found to be significantly altered in both microarray studies correlated in their gene expression pattern over the disease duration, QKI and SRSF7 were the only two genes showing concordance. The lack of concordance in splice-regulatory protein expression between the two microarray studies suggests that the majority of gene expression changes in the GDS810 study were likely influenced by changes in the white matter, which was largely excluded by the laser capture microdissection in the GSE28146 study.

Relationship between Splice-Regulatory Proteins and AD Susceptibility Genes

When it was assessed whether the expression of splice-regulatory proteins found to be significantly altered in AD correlated with the expression levels of AD susceptibility genes, significant correlations in APP and TrkB-TK- transcripts throughout AD progression in both the GDS810 and GSE28146 microarray studies suggest that changes in gene expression may be primarily influenced by changes in the grey matter, which is consistent with the cellular expression of APP (expressed primarily in neurons and glia and to a lesser extent in endothelial cells) and TrkB-TK- (expressed principally by astrocytes and to a lesser extent by neurons) [31,32,33]. The APP transcripts showing a significant correlation with YTHDC1 were targeted by pan probes, whereas the TrkB transcripts showing significant correlations with SRSF7, SFRS16, and SPQF were targeted by probes specific for the transcript variant encoding TrkB-TK-. These findings suggest that YTHDC1 may be involved in regulating constitutive splicing of the APP pre-mRNA rather than regulating alternative splicing of specific exons. The TrkB-TK- transcript variant encodes a TrkB protein isoform truncated at the C terminus and in comparison to the full-length receptor, and thus cannot partake in classical receptor tyrosine kinase signaling [34,35,36]. This is due to alternative exon splicing of the pre-mRNA where exon 16 is incorporated into the final transcript. Exon 16 encodes a translation stop codon and polyadenylation sequence; thus, transcripts are differentially regulated posttranscriptionally [34,36]. The finding that TrkB-TK- transcript levels correlated with the same splice-regulatory proteins significantly altered in both microarray studies implicates these splice-regulatory proteins as potential regulators of TrkB-TK- expression. In particular, SRSF7 has previously been demonstrated to be a regulator of tau alternative splicing [20]. Abnormal ratios of tau isoforms 3R and 4R (imperfect repeats of approximately 32 amino acids in the microtubule-binding domain) lead to tau aggregation and neurofibrillary tangle formation. The generation of tau isoforms 3R and 4R is determined by alternative mRNA splicing of exon 10 [20,21,22], and point mutations in the splice-regulatory region affecting SRSF7 binding have been shown to modulate inclusion/exclusion of tau exon 10 [20]. In both the GDS810 and GSE28146 microarray studies, the probes targeted to MAPT transcripts (gene encoding tau) were not specific for exon 10 detection, thus no significant correlation between changes in SRSF7 and MAPT expression was found. However, MAPT expression is likely to be regulated by additional mechanisms. Considering that SRSF7 was one of only two splice-regulatory proteins to be significantly and positively correlated between the two microarray studies and is significantly correlated with TrkB-TK- transcript levels in the two studies, the findings reported here implicate SRSF7 as a potential regulator of TrkB pre-mRNA splicing in the production of TrkB-TK- alternative transcripts in the grey matter. The lack of concordance between SFRS16 and SPQF gene expression changes between the GDS810 and GSE28146 microarray studies suggests that these two splice-regulatory proteins may function in regulating TrkB-TK- transcript levels in the white matter.

Conclusion

Dysregulation in splice-regulatory protein gene expression can adversely affect alternative splicing and gene expression of a number of cellular processes. The findings reported in this study offer mechanistic insight into how aberrant changes in alternative transcript expression may occur in AD and highlight a susceptibility network – splice-regulatory proteins – which can potentially link a number of susceptibility genes/pathways.

Disclosure Statement

There are no conflicts of interest and financial disclosures.
  36 in total

1.  Inflammation and Alzheimer disease: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  S C Weninger; B A Yankner
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Alternative splicing: increasing diversity in the proteomic world.

Authors:  B R Graveley
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Expression of TrkB subtypes in the adult monkey cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  Koji Ohira; Motoharu Hayashi
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.052

Review 4.  Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease.

Authors:  Nuno André Faustino; Thomas A Cooper
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Amyloid beta selectively modulates neuronal TrkB alternative transcript expression with implications for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J Wong; M Higgins; G Halliday; B Garner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Neurotransmitter receptors and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Yunqi Xu; Junqiang Yan; Peng Zhou; Jiejie Li; Huimin Gao; Ying Xia; Qing Wang
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 8.  Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Alberto Serrano-Pozo; Matthew P Frosch; Eliezer Masliah; Bradley T Hyman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Trk receptor alterations in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  B Connor; D Young; P Lawlor; W Gai; H Waldvogel; R L Faull; M Dragunow
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1996-11

10.  Alzheimer's disease: synaptic dysfunction and Abeta.

Authors:  Ganesh M Shankar; Dominic M Walsh
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 14.195

View more
  8 in total

1.  Astrocyte senescence contributes to cognitive decline.

Authors:  Tamas Csipo; Agnes Lipecz; Nicole M Ashpole; Priya Balasubramanian; Stefano Tarantini
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 7.713

Review 2.  Brain pathology in myotonic dystrophy: when tauopathy meets spliceopathy and RNAopathy.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Caillet-Boudin; Francisco-Jose Fernandez-Gomez; Hélène Tran; Claire-Marie Dhaenens; Luc Buee; Nicolas Sergeant
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.639

3.  Genes from a translational analysis support a multifactorial nature of white matter hyperintensities.

Authors:  Lorna M Lopez; W David Hill; Sarah E Harris; Maria Valdes Hernandez; Susana Munoz Maniega; Mark E Bastin; Emma Bailey; Colin Smith; Martin McBride; John McClure; Delyth Graham; Anna Dominiczak; Qiong Yang; Myriam Fornage; M Arfan Ikram; Stephanie Debette; Lenore Launer; Joshua C Bis; Reinhold Schmidt; Sudha Seshadri; David J Porteous; John Starr; Ian J Deary; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Computer Analysis of Glioma Transcriptome Profiling: Alternative Splicing Events.

Authors:  Vladimir N Babenko; Natalya V Gubanova; Anatoly O Bragin; Irina V Chadaeva; Gennady V Vasiliev; Irina V Medvedeva; Alexey S Gaytan; Alexey L Krivoshapkin; Yuriy L Orlov
Journal:  J Integr Bioinform       Date:  2017-09-18

5.  Identification of molecular correlations of RBM8A with autophagy in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Donghua Zou; Rongjie Li; Xiaohua Huang; Guoying Chen; Ying Liu; Youshi Meng; Yimei Wang; Yuan Wu; Yingwei Mao
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  Mapping the sequence specificity of heterotypic amyloid interactions enables the identification of aggregation modifiers.

Authors:  Nikolaos Louros; Meine Ramakers; Emiel Michiels; Katerina Konstantoulea; Chiara Morelli; Teresa Garcia; Nele Moonen; Sam D'Haeyer; Vera Goossens; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Dominique Audenaert; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Multiplexed Phosphoproteomic Study of Brain in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Age-Matched Cognitively Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Gajanan Sathe; Kiran Kumar Mangalaparthi; Ankit Jain; Jacqueline Darrow; Juan Troncoso; Marilyn Albert; Abhay Moghekar; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2020-03-17

8.  Astrocyte senescence may drive alterations in GFAPα, CDKN2A p14ARF, and TAU3 transcript expression and contribute to cognitive decline.

Authors:  Jed J Lye; Eva Latorre; Ben P Lee; Stefania Bandinelli; Janet E Holley; Nicholas J Gutowski; Luigi Ferrucci; Lorna W Harries
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.713

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.