Literature DB >> 23636114

Comparison of outcomes using AlloDerm versus FlexHD for implant-based breast reconstruction.

Daniel Z Liu1, David W Mathes, Peter C Neligan, Hakim K Said, Otway Louie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic reconstruction using human acellular dermis (ADM) is a common practice in breast reconstruction. AlloDerm and FlexHD are two different forms of ADM, each with unique characteristics. No studies have directly compared the postoperative complications of these 2 products.
METHODS: The outcomes of 547 consecutive implant-based breast reconstructions were reviewed.
RESULTS: Reconstruction was performed in 382 consecutive women (547 total breasts), employing mostly immediate reconstruction (81%). Mean follow-up was 6.4 months. Among immediate reconstructions, 165 used AlloDerm and 97 used FlexHD. Complications were similar by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, smoking and higher initial implant fill were risk factors for delayed healing. The use of FlexHD, single-stage reconstruction, and smoking were independent risk factors for implant loss.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in the complication rates between AlloDerm and FlexHD in immediate breast reconstruction. Multivariate analysis suggests that FlexHD may be a risk factor for implant loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23636114     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318268a87c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  19 in total

1.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

2.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Michael Sorkin; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany.

Authors:  M Dieterich; A Faridi
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Revascularization of AlloDerm Used during Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Zahrah M Taufique; Nupur Bhatt; David Zagzag; Richard A Lebowitz; Seth M Lieberman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-07-06

Review 5.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

6.  Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with the use of ADMs.

Authors:  Alexander Govshievich; Ron B Somogyi; Mitchell H Brown
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

7.  Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Sterile and Aseptic AlloDerm in 2039 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Rajiv P Parikh; Gabriella M Brown; Ketan Sharma; Yan Yan; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Scheflan; Amy S Colwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-09-08

9.  A systematic review of infection rates and associated antibiotic duration in acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Brett T Phillips; Muath Bishawi; Alexander B Dagum; Duc T Bui; Sami U Khan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-11-11

10.  Comparison of 30-day Clinical Outcomes with SimpliDerm and AlloDerm RTU in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Tierney
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.