Literature DB >> 23635679

Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life.

Emily S Miller1, Katherine Hahn, William A Grobman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate cumulative risks of morbidity associated with the choice of elective cesarean delivery for a first delivery.
METHODS: A decision analytic model was designed to compare major adverse outcomes across a woman's reproductive life associated with the choice of elective cesarean delivery compared with a trial of labor at a first delivery. Maternal outcomes assessed included maternal transfusion, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, operative injury, and death. Neonatal outcomes assessed included cerebral palsy and permanent brachial plexus palsy in the offspring.
RESULTS: Choosing an initial cesarean delivery resulted in a 0.3% increased risk of a major adverse maternal outcome in the first pregnancy. In each subsequent pregnancy, the difference in composite maternal morbidity increased such that by the fourth pregnancy, the cumulative risk of a major adverse maternal outcome was nearly 10% in the elective primary cesarean delivery group, three times higher than women who initially underwent a trial of labor. Although the choice of an initial cesarean delivery resulted in 2.4 and 0.41 fewer cases of cerebral palsy and brachial plexus palsy, respectively, per 10,000 women in the first pregnancy, by a fourth pregnancy, the risk of a adverse neonatal outcome was higher among offspring of women who had chosen the initial elective cesarean delivery (0.368% compared with 0.363%).
CONCLUSION: Maternal morbidity associated with the choice of primary elective cesarean delivery increases in each subsequent pregnancy and is greater in magnitude than that associated with the choice of a trial of labor. These increased risks are not offset by a substantive reduction in the risk of neonatal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635679     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

1.  Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Ya-Qin Wang; Tai-Lang Yin; Wang-Min Xu; Qian-Rong Qi; Xiao-Chen Wang; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21

2.  Labor length among overweight and obese women undergoing induction of labor.

Authors:  Adi Hirshberg; Lisa D Levine; Sindhu Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-02-03

3.  Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Benchmarking cesarean delivery rates using machine learning-derived optimal classification trees.

Authors:  Alexis C Gimovsky; Daisy Zhuo; Jordan T Levine; Jack Dunn; Maxime Amarm; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.734

5.  External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving.

Authors:  Raj Lakshmi Nalam; Priya Chinnachamy; Paul Emmanuel
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-02-08

6.  Determinants and trends in health facility-based deliveries and caesarean sections among married adolescent girls in Bangladesh.

Authors:  A S M Shahabuddin; Thérèse Delvaux; Bettina Utz; Azucena Bardají; Vincent De Brouwere
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy.

Authors:  Eileen Wang; Therese Hesketh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges.

Authors:  Sivan Zuarez-Easton; Noah Zafran; Gali Garmi; Raed Salim
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-02-17

9.  Trend in cesarean delivery rate among twin pregnancies over a 20 years epoch and the accompanied maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alon Tal; Noah Zafran; Hadar Peretz; Gali Garmi; Shabtai Romano; Raed Salim
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-04-30

10.  Trend in major neonatal and maternal morbidities accompanying the rise in the cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Sivan Zuarez-Easton; Eliezer Shalev; Raed Salim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.