BACKGROUND: Pre-analytical conditions are key factors in maintaining the high quality of biospecimens. They are necessary for accurate reproducibility of experiments in the field of biomarker discovery as well as achieving optimal specificity of laboratory tests for clinical diagnosis. In research at the National Biobank of Korea, we evaluated the impact of pre-analytical conditions on the stability of biobanked blood samples by measuring biochemical analytes commonly used in clinical laboratory tests. METHODS: We measured 10 routine laboratory analytes in serum and plasma samples from healthy donors (n = 50) with a chemistry autoanalyzer (Hitachi 7600-110). The analyte measurements were made at different time courses based on delay of blood fractionation, freezing delay of fractionated serum and plasma samples, and at different cycles (0, 1, 3, 6, 9) of freeze-thawing. Statistically significant changes from the reference sample mean were determined using the repeated-measures ANOVA and the significant change limit (SCL). RESULTS: The serum levels of GGT and LDH were changed significantly depending on both the time interval between blood collection and fractionation and the time interval between fractionation and freezing of serum and plasma samples. The glucose level was most sensitive only to the elapsed time between blood collection and centrifugation for blood fractionation. Based on these findings, a simple formula (glucose decrease by 1.387 mg/dL per hour) was derived to estimate the length of time delay after blood collection. In addition, AST, BUN, GGT, and LDH showed sensitive responses to repeated freeze-thaw cycles of serum and plasma samples. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that GGT and LDH measurements can be used as quality control markers for certain pre-analytical conditions (eg, delayed processing or repeated freeze-thawing) of blood samples which are either directly used in the laboratory tests or stored for future research in the biobank.
BACKGROUND: Pre-analytical conditions are key factors in maintaining the high quality of biospecimens. They are necessary for accurate reproducibility of experiments in the field of biomarker discovery as well as achieving optimal specificity of laboratory tests for clinical diagnosis. In research at the National Biobank of Korea, we evaluated the impact of pre-analytical conditions on the stability of biobanked blood samples by measuring biochemical analytes commonly used in clinical laboratory tests. METHODS: We measured 10 routine laboratory analytes in serum and plasma samples from healthy donors (n = 50) with a chemistry autoanalyzer (Hitachi 7600-110). The analyte measurements were made at different time courses based on delay of blood fractionation, freezing delay of fractionated serum and plasma samples, and at different cycles (0, 1, 3, 6, 9) of freeze-thawing. Statistically significant changes from the reference sample mean were determined using the repeated-measures ANOVA and the significant change limit (SCL). RESULTS: The serum levels of GGT and LDH were changed significantly depending on both the time interval between blood collection and fractionation and the time interval between fractionation and freezing of serum and plasma samples. The glucose level was most sensitive only to the elapsed time between blood collection and centrifugation for blood fractionation. Based on these findings, a simple formula (glucose decrease by 1.387 mg/dL per hour) was derived to estimate the length of time delay after blood collection. In addition, AST, BUN, GGT, and LDH showed sensitive responses to repeated freeze-thaw cycles of serum and plasma samples. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that GGT and LDH measurements can be used as quality control markers for certain pre-analytical conditions (eg, delayed processing or repeated freeze-thawing) of blood samples which are either directly used in the laboratory tests or stored for future research in the biobank.
Authors: John Marshall; Peter Kupchak; Weimin Zhu; Jason Yantha; Tammy Vrees; Shirley Furesz; Kellie Jacks; Chris Smith; Inga Kireeva; Rulin Zhang; Miyoko Takahashi; Eric Stanton; George Jackowski Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Joshua N Adkins; Matthew E Monroe; Kenneth J Auberry; Yufeng Shen; Jon M Jacobs; David G Camp; Frank Vitzthum; Karin D Rodland; Richard C Zangar; Richard D Smith; Joel G Pounds Journal: Proteomics Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Anne-Sofie Schrohl; Sidse Würtz; Elise Kohn; Rosamonde E Banks; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Fred C G J Sweep; Nils Brünner Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: N Leigh Anderson; Norman G Anderson; Terry W Pearson; Christoph H Borchers; Amanda G Paulovich; Scott D Patterson; Michael Gillette; Ruedi Aebersold; Steven A Carr Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2009-01-07 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Johann Zwirner; Rachel Kulakofsky; Antonia Fitzek; Ann Sophie Schröder; Simone Bohnert; Heike Franke; Thomas Renné; Rexson Tse; Benjamin Ondruschka Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 2.791
Authors: Bjoern Titz; Raffaella M Gadaleta; Giuseppe Lo Sasso; Ashraf Elamin; Kim Ekroos; Nikolai V Ivanov; Manuel C Peitsch; Julia Hoeng Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 5.923