Literature DB >> 23634184

Health resource utilization and multidisciplinary impact of endoscopic ultrasonography in a tertiary referral medical center.

Jamie B Sodikoff1, Sagar S Garud, Steven A Keilin, Sheila J Bharmal, Melinda M Lewis, Qiang Cai, Field F Willingham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a resource-intensive endoscopic procedure, but may result in high downstream health resource utilization and multispecialty impact. Our aim was to examine the downstream impact of EUS by specialty and by indication.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at an academic medical center for patients for whom EUS represented the first point of contact at the study institution within a 20-month period.
RESULTS: A total of 552 EUS procedures were reviewed and 208 represented the first point of contact. The most common principle indication involved the pancreas (n = 117, 56%). Downstream health utilization was calculated for an average of 313 days postprocedure (range: 35-632 days). Following unique referral for endoscopic ultrasound, 52% of the patients in the study were retained within the institution for further management and, of these, 34% had a major intervention in the form of surgery or chemoradiotherapy. Compared with other indications, patients presenting with a pancreatic mass were significantly more likely to remain in the study institution for further management (62% versus 39%, p = 0.005), were more likely to have a downstream surgery (29% versus 14%, p = 0.020) and were more likely to have downstream chemo-radiotherapy (11% versus 3%, p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS represents a unique portal of entry into tertiary referral medical centers. First point of contact EUS referrals are associated with major downstream health resource utilization and significantly increased utilization for mass lesions of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic ultrasound; fine-needle aspiration; health utilization; pancreatic mass

Year:  2013        PMID: 23634184      PMCID: PMC3625023          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X13479686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  13 in total

1.  Downstream hospital charges generated from endoscopic ultrasound procedures are greater than those from colonoscopies.

Authors:  Matt Atkinson; Nathan Schmulewitz
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Clinical implications of endoscopic ultrasound: the American Endosonography Club Study.

Authors:  N J Nickl; M S Bhutani; M Catalano; B Hoffman; R Hawes; A Chak; L D Roubein; M Kimmey; M Johnson; J Affronti; M Canto; M Sivak; H W Boyce; C J Lightdale; P Stevens; C Schmitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.

Authors:  M J Wiersema; P Vilmann; M Giovannini; K J Chang; L M Wiersema
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Effect of initiating a multidisciplinary care clinic on access and time to treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Timothy B Gardner; Richard J Barth; Bassem I Zaki; Brian R Boulay; Margit M McGowan; John E Sutton; Gregory H Ripple; Thomas A Colacchio; Kerrington D Smith; Ira R Byock; Marsha Call; Arief A Suriawinata; Michael J Tsapakos; Jeannine B Mills; Amitabh Srivastava; Maureen Stannard; Mikhail Lisovsky; Stuart R Gordon; J Marc Pipas
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications.

Authors:  Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Victor K Chen; Isam A Eltoum; Darshana Jhala; David C Chhieng; Nirag Jhala; Selwyn M Vickers; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Resource-intensive endoscopy: revenue source or cash drain?

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Wayne Stemmer; Joel Roth; Irving Waxman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chandrajit P Raut; Ana M Grau; Gregg A Staerkel; Madhukar Kaw; Eric P Tamm; Robert A Wolff; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Increased diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirates with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jamie B Sodikoff; Hunter L Johnson; Melinda M Lewis; Sagar S Garud; Sheila J Bharmal; Steven A Keilin; Momin T Siddiqui; Qiang Cai; Field F Willingham
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary management of resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

Authors:  Maki Yamamoto; David K Imagawa; Matthew Hg Katz
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  Upstream and downstream revenue of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound determined with an episode-of-care approach.

Authors:  Daniel Maeng; Beth Wall; Dina Hassen; David L Diehl
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-10-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.