OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV screening in U.S. health-care settings unless providers document a yield of undiagnosed HIV infections of <1 per 1,000 population. However, implementation of this guidance has not been widespread and little is known of the characteristics of hospitals with screening practices in place. We assessed how screening practices vary with hospital characteristics. METHODS: We used a national hospital survey of HIV testing practices, linked to HIV prevalence for the county, parish, borough, or city where the hospital was located, to assess HIV screening of some or all patients by hospitals. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the association between screening practices and hospital characteristics that were significantly associated with screening in bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 376 hospitals in areas of prevalence ≥0.1%, only 25 (6.6%) reported screening all patients for HIV and 131 (34.8%) reported screening some or all patients. Among 638 hospitals included, screening some or all patients was significantly (p<0.05) more common at teaching hospitals, hospitals with higher numbers of annual admissions, and hospitals with a high proportion of Medicaid admissions. In multivariable analysis, screening some or all patients was independently associated with admitting more than 15% of Medicaid patients and receiving resources or reimbursement for screening tests. CONCLUSION: We found that few hospitals surveyed reported screening some or all patients, and failure to screen is common across all types of hospitals in all regions of the country. Expanded reimbursement for screening may increase compliance with the recommendations.
OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV screening in U.S. health-care settings unless providers document a yield of undiagnosed HIV infections of <1 per 1,000 population. However, implementation of this guidance has not been widespread and little is known of the characteristics of hospitals with screening practices in place. We assessed how screening practices vary with hospital characteristics. METHODS: We used a national hospital survey of HIV testing practices, linked to HIV prevalence for the county, parish, borough, or city where the hospital was located, to assess HIV screening of some or all patients by hospitals. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the association between screening practices and hospital characteristics that were significantly associated with screening in bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 376 hospitals in areas of prevalence ≥0.1%, only 25 (6.6%) reported screening all patients for HIV and 131 (34.8%) reported screening some or all patients. Among 638 hospitals included, screening some or all patients was significantly (p<0.05) more common at teaching hospitals, hospitals with higher numbers of annual admissions, and hospitals with a high proportion of Medicaid admissions. In multivariable analysis, screening some or all patients was independently associated with admitting more than 15% of Medicaid patients and receiving resources or reimbursement for screening tests. CONCLUSION: We found that few hospitals surveyed reported screening some or all patients, and failure to screen is common across all types of hospitals in all regions of the country. Expanded reimbursement for screening may increase compliance with the recommendations.
Authors: Ryan C Burke; Kent A Sepkowitz; Kyle T Bernstein; Adam M Karpati; Julie E Myers; Benjamin W Tsoi; Elizabeth M Begier Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-07-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Andrew C Voetsch; James D Heffelfinger; Juliet Yonek; Pragna Patel; Steven F Ethridge; Gretchen W Torres; Margaret A Lampe; Bernard M Branson Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: V Miller; A Mocroft; P Reiss; C Katlama; A I Papadopoulos; T Katzenstein; J van Lunzen; F Antunes; A N Phillips; J D Lundgren Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Bernard M Branson; H Hunter Handsfield; Margaret A Lampe; Robert S Janssen; Allan W Taylor; Sheryl B Lyss; Jill E Clark Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2006-09-22
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; A David Paltiel; Elena Losina; Lauren M Mercincavage; Bruce R Schackman; Paul E Sax; Milton C Weinstein; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Gretchen Williams Torres; Juliet Yonek; Jeremy Pickreign; Heidi Whitmore; Romana Hasnain-Wynia Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: A Mocroft; S Vella; T L Benfield; A Chiesi; V Miller; P Gargalianos; A d'Arminio Monforte; I Yust; J N Bruun; A N Phillips; J D Lundgren Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-11-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R Detels; A Muñoz; G McFarlane; L A Kingsley; J B Margolick; J Giorgi; L K Schrager; J P Phair Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-11-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sara Bares; Rebecca Eavou; Clara Bertozzi-Villa; Michelle Taylor; Heather Hyland; Rachel McFadden; Sachin Shah; Mai T Pho; James Walter; Sameer Badlani; John Schneider; Nik Prachand; Nanette Benbow; David Pitrak Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792