Literature DB >> 10189326

Relations among CD4 lymphocyte count nadir, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV-1 disease progression: results from the EuroSIDA study.

V Miller1, A Mocroft, P Reiss, C Katlama, A I Papadopoulos, T Katzenstein, J van Lunzen, F Antunes, A N Phillips, J D Lundgren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of previous CD4 cell count nadir on clinical progression in patients with increases in CD4 cell counts has not been investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To assess risk for progression of HIV disease in patients with CD4 counts of at least 200 cells/mm3 (stratified by the lowest previous CD4 count) and compare the rate of progression in patients with CD4 counts less than 50 cells/mm3 with that in patients whose CD4 counts rebounded from less than 50 cells/mm3 to at least 200 cells/mm3.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational multicenter study.
SETTING: 52 HIV outpatient clinics in Europe. PATIENTS: Two groups were identified: those with CD4 counts of at least 200 cells/mm3 (group A) and those with CD4 counts less than 50 cells/mm3 (group B). Group A was stratified according to the lowest previous CD4 count: at least 150 cells/mm3 (stratum 1), 100 to 149 cells/mm3 (stratum 2), 50 to 99 cells/mm3 (stratum 3), and 1 to 50 cells/mm3 (stratum 4). MEASUREMENTS: Patients were followed until a progression event occurred (first AIDS-defining event, new AIDS-defining event, or death) or until the CD4 count decreased to less than 200 cells/mm3 (group A) or increased to more than 50 cells/mm3 (group B). Incidence rates were based on a patient-years analysis and reported as events per 100 patient-years of follow-up; the relative hazards for progression were based on Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: The overall rate of disease progression in group A was 3.9 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 3.5 to 4.3 per 100 patient-years), whereas in group B it was much higher (72.9 per 100 patient-years [CI, 69.0 to 76.8 per 100 patient-years]). In group A, the rate increased in patients with previous low CD4 cell count nadirs, resulting in a significant increase in the relative hazard for progression. The relative hazards for strata 2, 3, and 4 were 2.29 (CI, 1.30 to 4.03), 3.65 (CI, 1.94 to 6.85), and 2.94 (CI, 1.44 to 6.00), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Increases in CD4 counts from very low levels to at least 200 cells/mm3 are associated with a much reduced rate of disease progression. However, a previously low CD4 cell count nadir remains associated with a moderately higher risk for disease progression among patients with CD4 counts of at least 200 cells/mm3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10189326     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-7-199904060-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  31 in total

Review 1.  The pulmonary physician in critical care * Illustrative case 5: HIV associated pneumonia.

Authors:  R J Boyton; D M Mitchell; O M Kon
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Memory responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals with long-term viral load suppression are independent of CD4 cell nadir.

Authors:  Michael A Kolber; Maria O Saenz; Sameer Kaul
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-01

3.  Lower CD4 cell count and higher virus load, but not antiretroviral drug resistance, are associated with AIDS-defining events and mortality: an ACTG Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials (ALLRT) analysis.

Authors:  Susan Swindells; Hongyu Jiang; A Lisa Mukherjee; Mark Winters; Ronald J Bosch; David Katzenstein
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Management of patients with HIV in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Henry Masur
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2006

5.  Low antigen-specific CD4 T-cell immune responses despite normal absolute CD4 counts after long-term antiretroviral therapy an African cohort.

Authors:  Rose Nabatanzi; Lois Bayigga; Isaac Ssinabulya; Agnes Kiragga; Andrew Kambugu; Joseph Olobo; Moses Joloba; Moses R Kamya; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Damalie Nakanjako
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.685

6.  HIV screening practices and hospital characteristics in the US, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Laura G Wesolowski; James D Heffelfinger; Nathan Bostick; H Irene Hall; Steven F Ethridge; Bernard M Branson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Lowest ever CD4 lymphocyte count (CD4 nadir) as a predictor of current cognitive and neurological status in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection--The Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort.

Authors:  Victor Valcour; Priscilla Yee; Andrew E Williams; Bruce Shiramizu; Michael Watters; Ola Selnes; Robert Paul; Cecilia Shikuma; Ned Sacktor
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.643

8.  Lower CD4+ T lymphocyte nadirs may indicate limited immune reconstitution in HIV-1 infected individuals on potent antiretroviral therapy: analysis of immunophenotypic marker results of AACTG 5067.

Authors:  Ronald D'Amico; Yijun Yang; Donna Mildvan; Scott R Evans; Carol T Schnizlein-Bick; Richard Hafner; Nancy Webb; Michael Basar; Robert Zackin; Mark A Jacobson
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.317

9.  Clinical, immunological and virological evolution in patients with CD4 T-cell count above 500/mm3: is there a benefit to treat with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)?

Authors:  Lionel Piroth; Christine Binquet; Marielle Buisson; Evelyne Kohli; Michel Duong; Michèle Grappin; Michal Abrahamowicz; Catherine Quantin; Henri Portier; Pascal Chavanet
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  When to start antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: a human rights analysis.

Authors:  Nathan Ford; Alexandra Calmy; Samia Hurst
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2010-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.