Marie-Hélène Savard1, Josée Savard, Aude Caplette-Gingras, Hans Ivers, Célyne Bastien. 1. From the 1School of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada; 2Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec, Canada; 3Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Quebec, Canada; and 4Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between various characteristics of objectively recorded hot flashes and sleep disturbances in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Fifty-six women who had completed a similar treatment protocol for a first diagnosis of breast cancer within the previous 3 months wore ambulatory sternal skin conductance and polysomnography devices for a home-based nighttime recording of hot flashes and sleep. RESULTS: Hot flash frequency was not associated with polysomnographic variables (r = -0.18 to 0.21) or beta-I and beta-II electroencephalographic activities (r = -0.01 and 0.03) but was significantly correlated with increased slow (r = 0.28) and delta (r = 0.32) electroencephalographic activities. A slower hot flash onset and a longer hot flash duration were associated with greater polysomnographic impairments (r = -0.50 to 0.48). Greater sleep disturbances were found during hot flash onset or hot flash plateau as compared with the pre-hot flash period (greater percentage of wake time, lower percentage of stage II sleep, and lower percentage of rapid eye movement sleep, all P values < 0.05). The probability that a stage change to a lighter sleep occurred was significantly greater during hot flash onset (11%) than during hot flash plateau (6%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the speed and duration of hot flashes would contribute more importantly to sleep alterations than hot flash frequency. Sleep disturbances tend to occur simultaneously with hot flashes, suggesting that these two nocturnal symptoms are manifestations of a higher-order mechanism involving the central nervous system.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between various characteristics of objectively recorded hot flashes and sleep disturbances in breast cancerpatients. METHODS: Fifty-six women who had completed a similar treatment protocol for a first diagnosis of breast cancer within the previous 3 months wore ambulatory sternal skin conductance and polysomnography devices for a home-based nighttime recording of hot flashes and sleep. RESULTS: Hot flash frequency was not associated with polysomnographic variables (r = -0.18 to 0.21) or beta-I and beta-II electroencephalographic activities (r = -0.01 and 0.03) but was significantly correlated with increased slow (r = 0.28) and delta (r = 0.32) electroencephalographic activities. A slower hot flash onset and a longer hot flash duration were associated with greater polysomnographic impairments (r = -0.50 to 0.48). Greater sleep disturbances were found during hot flash onset or hot flash plateau as compared with the pre-hot flash period (greater percentage of wake time, lower percentage of stage II sleep, and lower percentage of rapid eye movement sleep, all P values < 0.05). The probability that a stage change to a lighter sleep occurred was significantly greater during hot flash onset (11%) than during hot flash plateau (6%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the speed and duration of hot flashes would contribute more importantly to sleep alterations than hot flash frequency. Sleep disturbances tend to occur simultaneously with hot flashes, suggesting that these two nocturnal symptoms are manifestations of a higher-order mechanism involving the central nervous system.
Authors: Nikolaos Papachristou; Payam Barnaghi; Bruce Cooper; Kord M Kober; Roma Maguire; Steven M Paul; Marilyn Hammer; Fay Wright; Jo Armes; Eileen P Furlong; Lisa McCann; Yvette P Conley; Elisabeth Patiraki; Stylianos Katsaragakis; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Brian D Gonzalez; Brent J Small; Mallory G Cases; Noelle L Williams; Mayer N Fishman; Paul B Jacobsen; Heather S L Jim Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ian R Kleckner; Rebecca M Jones; Oliver Wilder-Smith; Jolie B Wormwood; Murat Akcakaya; Karen S Quigley; Catherine Lord; Matthew S Goodwin Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Fiona C Baker; Mohamad Forouzanfar; Aimée Goldstone; Stephanie A Claudatos; Harold Javitz; John Trinder; Massimiliano De Zambotti Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 5.849