Literature DB >> 23631814

Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Andrés Esteban1, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Alfonso Muriel, Niall D Ferguson, Oscar Peñuelas, Victor Abraira, Konstantinos Raymondos, Fernando Rios, Nicolas Nin, Carlos Apezteguía, Damian A Violi, Arnaud W Thille, Laurent Brochard, Marco González, Asisclo J Villagomez, Javier Hurtado, Andrew R Davies, Bin Du, Salvatore M Maggiore, Paolo Pelosi, Luis Soto, Vinko Tomicic, Gabriel D'Empaire, Dimitrios Matamis, Fekri Abroug, Rui P Moreno, Marco Antonio Soares, Yaseen Arabi, Freddy Sandi, Manuel Jibaja, Pravin Amin, Younsuck Koh, Michael A Kuiper, Hans-Henrik Bülow, Amine Ali Zeggwagh, Antonio Anzueto.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Baseline characteristics and management have changed over time in patients requiring mechanical ventilation; however, the impact of these changes on patient outcomes is unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate whether mortality in mechanically ventilated patients has changed over time.
METHODS: Prospective cohort studies conducted in 1998, 2004, and 2010, including patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 12 hours in a 1-month period, from 927 units in 40 countries. To examine effects over time on mortality in intensive care units, we performed generalized estimating equation models.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 18,302 patients. The reasons for initiating mechanical ventilation varied significantly among cohorts. Ventilatory management changed over time (P < 0.001), with increased use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (5% in 1998 to 14% in 2010), a decrease in tidal volume (mean 8.8 ml/kg actual body weight [SD = 2.1] in 1998 to 6.9 ml/kg [SD = 1.9] in 2010), and an increase in applied positive end-expiratory pressure (mean 4.2 cm H2O [SD = 3.8] in 1998 to 7.0 cm of H2O [SD = 3.0] in 2010). Crude mortality in the intensive care unit decreased in 2010 compared with 1998 (28 versus 31%; odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.94), despite a similar complication rate. Hospital mortality decreased similarly. After adjusting for baseline and management variables, this difference remained significant (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics and ventilation practices have changed over time, and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients have improved. Clinical trials registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01093482).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23631814     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2169OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  188 in total

1.  High flow on the rise-pediatric perspectives on the FLORALI trial.

Authors:  Christophe Milési; Julien Baleine; Julia le Bouhellec; Marti Pons-Odena; Gilles Cambonie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  High flow nasal cannula-coming to a hypoxic patient near you!

Authors:  Jan Hau Lee; Michael A Gentile
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Improve survival from prolonged mechanical ventilation: beginning with first step.

Authors:  Chun Pan; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  One more brick in the wall of protective ventilation in surgical patients.

Authors:  Roberto Rabello Filho; Ary Serpa Neto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Platelets in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Hemang Yadav; Daryl J Kor
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.464

6.  Epidemiological trends in invasive mechanical ventilation in the United States: A population-based study.

Authors:  Anuj B Mehta; Sohera N Syeda; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Allan J Walkey
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  A Descriptive Report of Early Mobilization for Critically Ill Ventilated Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Weeks; Claudine Campbell; Prabalini Rajendram; Weiji Shi; Louis Voigt
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2017-07

8.  A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study.

Authors:  C Guérin; P Beuret; J M Constantin; G Bellani; P Garcia-Olivares; O Roca; J H Meertens; P Azevedo Maia; T Becher; J Peterson; A Larsson; M Gurjar; Z Hajjej; F Kovari; A H Assiri; E Mainas; M S Hasan; D R Morocho-Tutillo; L Baboi; J M Chrétien; G François; L Ayzac; L Chen; L Brochard; A Mercat
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  The influence of hospitalization or intensive care unit admission on declines in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Laura C Feemster; Colin R Cooke; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Catherine L Hough; William J Ehlenbach; David H Au; Vincent S Fan
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-01

Review 10.  Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Jordan; Louise Rose; Katie N Dainty; Jane Noyes; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.