| Literature DB >> 23630329 |
Susanne Jochner1, Josef Höfler, Isabelle Beck, Axel Göttlein, Donna Pauler Ankerst, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann, Annette Menzel.
Abstract
Phenology ranks among the best ecosystem processes for fingerprinting climate change since temperature explains a high percentage of the interannual or spatial variation in phenological onset dates. However, roles of other environmental variables, such as foliar nutrient concentrations, are far from adequately understood. This observational study examined the effects of air temperature and 11 nutrients on spring phenology of Betula pendula Roth (birch) along an urban-rural gradient in Munich, Germany, during the years 2010/2011. Moreover, the influence of temperature, nutrients, and air pollutants (NO2 and O3) on the amounts of pollen and catkin biomass in 2010 was evaluated. In addition to the influence of higher temperatures advancing phenological onset dates, higher foliar concentrations of potassium, boron, zinc, and calcium were statistically significantly linked to earlier onset dates. Since flushing of leaves is a turgor-driven process and all the influential nutrients are involved in cell extension, membrane function, and stability, there might be a reasonable physiological interpretation of the observed association. The amounts of pollen were negatively correlated with temperature, atmospheric NO2, and foliar iron concentration, suggesting that these variables restrict pollen production. The results of this study suggested an influence of nutritional status on both phenology and pollen production. The interaction of urbanization and climate change should be considered in the assessment of the impact of global warming on ecosystems and human health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23630329 PMCID: PMC3638828 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Locations of the selected birch sites in the greater area of Munich, Germany (city outline denoted by the solid black line; source: Landeshauptstadt München). Black dots denote sites where meteorological measurements, nutrient analyses, and phenological observations were collected (n=34); yellow dots indicate measurements of amounts of pollen/catkin weights, nutrient analyses, and measurements of pollutant (n=22). Background: terrain map BK200 (1:200 000; source: Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt); beige, primarily Calcaric Regosols derived from deposited humic material above carbonatic gravel or building site rubble; light pink, Calcaric Regosols derived from carbonatic gravel, mostly covered with a shallow layer of marly or loamy river sediments; dark pink, primarily Calcaric Regosols very rich in humus derived from carbonatic gravel, mostly covered with a layer of marly or loamy river sediments; brown, primarily Luvisols and their transitional forms to Cambisols derived from carbonatic gravel covered with layers of loamy river sediments; dark green, primarily low-level moor, some of them calcareous; light green, primarily Humic Gleysols derived from fluvial marl over carbonatic gravel. For a complete legend see www.geoportal.bayern.de. Inset: location of the study area (dot) within Germany.
Fig. 2.Phenological onset dates (day of year) versus mean March and April temperatures (°C) for birch in 2010 (blue) and 2011 (red) with pointwise 95% confidence bands (shaded). The black line represents the trend with both years grouped together. The black line with its confidence band is an estimation using local weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS). The blue and red lines are estimates of linear models and the corresponding confidence bands. (a) Beginning of flowering (BBCH 61); (b) full flowering (BBCH 65); (c) mouse-ear stage (BBCH 10); and (d) leaf unfolding (BBCH 11).
Foliar threshold values of nutrient supply of birch (deficit, adequate, and excess range) derived from the van den Burg data set, and number (n) of trees that fell into the respective category.
| Nutrient | Deficency range | Normal range | Surplus rangec | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficency | Latent | Lower | Central | Upper | Luxury | |||||||
| N | <19.2 | 1 | 19.2–24.6 | 18 | 24.6–25.8 | 6 | 25.8–30.2 | 9 | 30.2–33.4 | 0 | 33.4–37.9 | 0 |
| P | <1.3 | 1 | 1.3–1.9 | 6 | 1.9–2.4 | 3 | 2.4–3.5 | 20 | 3.5–4.2 | 4 | 4.2–5.3 | 0 |
| K | <5.4 | 1 | 5.4–7.2 | 4 | 7.2–8.9 | 10 | 8.9–11.9 | 14 | 11.9–13.1 | 4 | 13.1–31 | 1 |
| Ca | <4.4 | 0 | 4.4–6.2 | 0 | 6.2–9.5 | 3 | 9.5–11.1 | 4 | >11.1 | 27 | ||
| Mg | <1.2 | 0 | 1.2–2 | 2 | 2–2.5 | 5 | 2.5–3.5 | 14 | 3.5–4.1 | 11 | >4.1 | 2 |
| S | <1.4 | 2 | 1.4–1.9 | 20 | 1.9–2 | 7 | 2–2.6 | 5 | 2.6–3.1 | 0 | >3.1 | 0 |
| Fe | <85 | 32 | 85–99 | 2 | 99–144 | 0 | 144–175 | 0 | >175 | 0 | ||
| Mn | <142 | 33 | 142–377 | 1 | 377–783 | 0 | 783–954 | 0 | >954 | 0 | ||
| Cu | <5 | 4 | 5–6 | 6 | 6–8 | 24 | 8–9 | 0 | >9 | 0 | ||
| Zn | <176 | 16 | 176–374 | 16 | 374–773 | 2 | 773–973 | 0 | >973 | 0 | ||
| B | <26 | 1 | 26–38 | 10 | 38–53 | 15 | 53–56 | 2 | 56–300 | 6 | ||
Units are mg g–1 for N through S, and µg g–1 for all others.
There were no trees in the extreme deficiency ranges defined for N (<19.4), K (<3.6), Mg (<1.1), and Mn (<12).
There were no trees in the extreme surplus ranges defined for N (>37.9), P (>5.3), K (>1), and B (>300).
Correlations (adjusted for urban index) between different phenophases of birch (2010 and 2011) and foliar nutrient concentrations in Munich.
| BBCH | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | S | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | –0.061NS | –0.174NS | –0.559*** | –0.274NS | –0.147NS | –0.220NS | –0.126NS | 0.094NS | –0.106NS | –0.330(*) | –0.459** |
| 65 | –0.087NS | –0.239NS | –0.554*** | –0.383* | –0.275NS | –0.193NS | –0.344* | –0.067NS | –0.164NS | –0.390* | –0.472** |
| 10 | 0.051NS | –0.108NS | –0.598*** | –0.434* | –0.114NS | 0.117NS | –0.392* | 0.005NS | –0.093NS | –0.420* | –0.479** |
| 11 | 0.086NS | –0.196NS | –0.600*** | –0.495** | –0.316(*) | –0.127NS | –0.295(*) | –0.045NS | –0.029NS | –0.474** | –0.576*** |
BBCH 61, beginning of flowering; BBCH 65, full flowering; BBCH 10, mouse-ear stage; BBCH 11, first leaves unfolded.
***P ≤ 0.001; **P ≤ 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; (*)P ≤ 0.1; NS, not significant.
LME model results and coefficients: Percentage of explained variance due to explanatory variables in the linear mixed effects models and their respective AIC and BIC values (here, values in parentheses refer to linear mixed effects models solely based on temperature; lower AICs and BICs indicate better fitting models), estimated regression coefficients and their standard deviations (SD), and the SD of random site effects.
| BBCH | Explained variance | Criterion | Covariates | Random effect | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | avgT | avgT:T | K | AIC | BIC | Intercept (SD) | T (SD) | avgT (SD) | avgT:T (SD) | K (SD) | SD | |
| 61 | 83.7*** | 2.6*** | Not included | 0.6* | 282.3 (299.7) | 295.5 (310.0) | 151.38 (2.09) | –2.973** (0.47) | –2.63*** (0.52) | Not included | –0.26* (0.12) | 0.625 |
| 65 | 81.5*** | 1.3*** | Not included | Not included | 291.8 (301.2) | 302.9 (308.5) | 154.30 (1.78) | –3.99*** (0.51) | –1.94*** (0.55) | Not included | Not included | 1.068 |
| 10 | 55.7*** | 0.3NS | 5.8*** | 3.0** | 314.8 (321.0) | 330.3 (303.9) | 262.26 (31.81) | –20.37*** (4.12) | –16.91NS (3.98) | 2.13*** (0.50) | –0.47** (0.16) | 0.946 |
| 11 | 81.4*** | 3.0*** | 1.1** | 1.1** | 284.8 (290.6) | 300.2 (334.2) | 228.98 (25.64) | –12.39*** (3.32) | –12.53*** (3.21) | 1.20** (0.40) | –0.37** (0.12) | 0.715 |
K, potassium; T, mean March and April temperature; avgT:T, interaction of factor variable year and temperature; BBCH 61, beginning of flowering; BBCH 65, full flowering; BBCH 10, mouse-ear stage; BBCH 11, first leaves unfolded.
***P ≤ 0.001; **P ≤ 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; (*)P ≤ 0.1; NS, not significant.
Fig. 3.Illustration of the relationship between onset dates, and mean March and April temperatures (°C) as well as foliar K (potassium) concentration (mg g–1). The contour lines with corresponding label denote the onset date. (a) Beginning of flowering (BBCH 61); (b) mouse-ear stage (BBCH 10); and (c) leaf unfolding (BBCH 11).
Spearman correlation matrix for mean March–April temperature (T) and foliar nutrient concentrations.
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | S | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | –0.089NS | 0.220* | 0.223* | 0.069NS | 0.079NS | –0.025NS | 0.134NS | 0.151NS | 0.071NS | 0.246* | 0.269* |
| N | 0.303* | 0.336** | –0.081NS | –0.067NS | 0.828*** | –0.041NS | –0.086NS | 0.483*** | –0.152NS | 0.197NS | |
| P | 0.484*** | 0.141NS | 0.405*** | 0.273* | 0.418*** | 0.534*** | 0.481*** | 0.382** | 0.529*** | ||
| K | 0.289* | 0.155NS | 0.461*** | 0.302* | 0.189NS | 0.335** | 0.407*** | 0.672*** | |||
| Ca | 0.772*** | 0.020NS | 0.302* | 0.436*** | –0.134NS | 0.501*** | 0.346** | ||||
| Mg | 0.023NS | 0.446*** | 0.642*** | 0.079NS | 0.603*** | 0.415*** | |||||
| S | –0.099NS | –0.124NS | 0.610*** | 0.010NS | 0.370** | ||||||
| Fe | 0.468*** | 0.226(*) | 0.450*** | 0.468*** | |||||||
| Mn | 0.077NS | 0.479*** | 0.293* | ||||||||
| Cu | 0.22(*) | 0.353** | |||||||||
| Zn | 0.443*** |
***P ≤ 0.001; **P ≤ 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; (*)P ≤ 0.1; NS, not significant.
Correlations (adjusted for urban index) between pollen amounts, catkin biomass, and mean March–April temperature (T), foliar nutrient concentrations, and air pollutants in Munich 2010.
| Variable | T | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | S | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | B | O3 | NO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount of pollen | –0.770*** | 0.152NS | 0.172NS | –0.490* | –0.425(*) | –0.144NS | –0.106NS | –0.575** | 0.325NS | –0.286NS | –0.244NS | –0.332NS | –0.044NS | –0.479* |
| Catkin biomass | 0.429(*) | 0.185NS | –0.037NS | 0.527* | 0.440(*) | 0.228NS | 0.342NS | 0.176NS | 0.008NS | –0.138NS | 0.519* | 0.526* | 0.071NS | 0.194NS |
***P ≤ 0.001; **P ≤ 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; (*)P ≤ 0.1; NS, not significant.
Percentage explained variance according to explanatory variables in the linear regression models and their respective AIC and BIC values (here, values in parentheses refer to linear regression models solely based on temperature; lower AIC and BIC values indicate better-fitting models).
| Variable | Explained variance | Criterion | Coefficients | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Fe | Ca | N | P | AIC | BIC | Intercept | T | Fe | Ca | N | P | |
| Amount of pollen | 58.2*** | 14.3* | Not included | Not included | Not included | –65.12 (–59.22) | –62.03 (–56.90) | 0.619*** | –0.057*** | –0.001* | Not included | Not included | Not included |
| Catkin biomass | 11.8*** | Not included | 24.5*** | 23.44** | 14.0* | –54.08 (–36.83) | –49.45 (–34.51) | –1.190*** | 0.092*** | Not included | 0.013*** | 0.269** | –0.041* |
T, March and April temperature; Fe, iron; Ca, calcium; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus.
***P ≤ 0.001; **P ≤ 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; (*)P ≤ 0.1; NS, not significant.