Literature DB >> 11769320

Phenological modifications in plants by various edaphic factors.

F E Wielgolaski1.   

Abstract

Various mechanical, chemical and physical soil analyses were carried out, in addition to weather observations, for 3 years at several sites along an oceanic-continental gradient in a fjord district in western Norway. All the environmental factors observed were correlated with the spring and a few late-season phenophases of many native and cultivated woody plants and some herbs by simple, linear correlations and by stepwise multiple and partial analyses. Different techniques were used to try and eliminate many intercorrelations between various environmental factors. As expected, air temperature measurements in nearly all analyses from these temperate region districts gave the most significant correlations with the phenology of the plants, the temperature during the night generally being the most important in mainly vegetative periods, e.g. to leaf bud break in spring, and the temperature during the day affecting the more generative phases, such as the period between leaf bud break and flowering. The other environmental factors, however, showed strong variation in correlation significance among the various species studied and also with different phenophases of the same species. Various hypotheses are put forward to explain such variation. Air humidity (including precipitation) and/or soil moisture (including intercorrelated parameters, e.g. soil grain size and bulk density) were relatively often found to be of importance. In the stepwise multiple analyses for leaf bud break of the birch (Betula pubescens), for instance, the amount of precipitation was the second factor to enter the analyses by a positive correlation with the developmental rate, after the most important factor, the night temperature. Positive correlations with a high clay content and bulk density in the soil indicated that high soil moisture is also favourable for early bud break in the birch. Other phenophases that seemed to be favoured by a good water supply were leaf bud break of the bird cherry (Prunus padus) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), and flowering of the hazel (Corylus avellana), common lilac (Syringa vulgaris), plum ('Victoria') and currant ('Red Dutch') and also, to some degree, the goat willow (Salix caprea). The amount of ions (P, K, Mg and Ca) often showed negative correlations with the developmental rate, particularly of earlier phenophases of both native and cultivated plants (except for the apple 'Gravenstein' and pear 'Moltke'), possibly, indicating that a high nutrient level delayed plant development. A similar explanation might be given for the observation that high pH in the soil often seemed to delay plant development (leaf bud break of Betula, Sorbus, Syringa and plum, and flowering of Corylus, bluebell (Campanula rotundifolia) and red currant). According to the analyses there seemed to be a tendency for plants that are particularly dependent on warm weather for leaf bud break, e.g. the ash (Fraxinus excelsior), and flowering, e.g. Prunus, pear, apple and, to some degree, the raspberry ('Preussen'), to be less dependent on other environmental factors for their development. For instance, if there were any effects of water for these plants, they were negative for moisture and soil factors intercorrelated with water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11769320     DOI: 10.1007/s004840100100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  27 in total

1.  Assessment of biological and environmental phenology at a landscape level from 30 years of fixed-date repeat photography in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Christopher Andrews; Jan Dick; Christer Jonasson; Terry Callaghan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 2.  Towards identifying genes underlying ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Joy Bergelson; Fabrice Roux
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Progress and Promise in using Arabidopsis to Study Adaptation, Divergence, and Speciation.

Authors:  Ben Hunter; Kirsten Bomblies
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2010-09-29

4.  Phenological model of bird cherry Padus racemosa with data assimilation.

Authors:  Andis Kalvāns; Tija Sīle; Gunta Kalvāne
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Bayesian calibration of the Unified budburst model in six temperate tree species.

Authors:  Yongshuo H Fu; Matteo Campioli; Gaston Demarée; Alex Deckmyn; Rafiq Hamdi; Ivan A Janssens; Gaby Deckmyn
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Complex spatiotemporal phenological shifts as a response to rainfall changes.

Authors:  Josep Peñuelas; Iolanda Filella; Xiaoyang Zhang; Laura Llorens; Romà Ogaya; Francisco Lloret; Pere Comas; Marc Estiarte; Jaume Terradas
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  The rise of phenology with climate change: an evaluation of IJB publications.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Rong Yu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

8.  Phenological patterns of flowering across biogeographical regions of Europe.

Authors:  Barbara Templ; Matthias Templ; Peter Filzmoser; Annamária Lehoczky; Eugenija Bakšienè; Stefan Fleck; Hilppa Gregow; Sabina Hodzic; Gunta Kalvane; Eero Kubin; Vello Palm; Danuta Romanovskaja; Višnja Vucˇetic; Ana Žust; Bálint Czúcz
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.787

9.  Evaluation of recent trends in Australian pome fruit spring phenology.

Authors:  Rebecca Darbyshire; Leanne Webb; Ian Goodwin; E W R Barlow
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Trends in phenology of Betula pubescens across the boreal zone in Finland.

Authors:  Eeva Pudas; Mirva Leppälä; Anne Tolvanen; Jarmo Poikolainen; Ari Venäläinen; Eero Kubin
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.