Literature DB >> 23629094

Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery.

Scott L Spear1, Jeremy C Sinkin, Ali Al-Attar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although acellular dermal matrix materials have been in use for over a decade in primary and secondary breast reconstruction and in some cosmetic breast surgery, little has been published on the outcomes of these materials for cosmetic applications.
METHODS: A retrospective institutional review board-approved review was conducted of all patients who had a specific acellular dermal matrix, Strattice, used for cosmetic breast surgery performed by the senior author (S.L.S.). Patient demographics, indications, surgical findings, and postoperative course were collected and data analyzed using descriptive statistical tools.
RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2012, Strattice was used in 43 cosmetic breast operations (75 breasts) performed by the senior author (S.L.S.). Sixty-nine of the 75 breasts (92 percent) were revision operations. Indications included inferior pole support [39 breasts (52 percent)], fold malpositions [28 breasts (37 percent)], capsular contracture [25 breasts (33 percent)], and rippling/palpability [six breasts (8 percent)]. Three patients (six breasts) had Strattice placed during primary augmentation/mastopexy. Seventy-four of the 75 breasts (98.7 percent) had successfully achieved the indication for which the Strattice was placed; one breast (1.2 percent) had some degree of relapse. The global complication rate for all patients in this study is 5.3 percent-two breasts (2.7 percent) had postoperative malposition, one breast (1.2 percent) had bottoming out, and one breast (1.2 percent) developed an infection that resulted in temporary device explantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Strattice is safe and may be helpful in the management of certain situations in cosmetic breast surgery, including needed lower pole support, capsular contracture, rippling, and implant malposition. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23629094     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865d0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Capsular Contracture (CC): Literature Review and Outcomes Utilizing Implants in Revisionary Surgery.

Authors:  Nicola Zingaretti; Paolo Vittorini; Valentina Savino; Jacopo Claudio Vittorini; Francesco De Francesco; Michele Riccio; Pier Camillo Parodi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany.

Authors:  M Dieterich; A Faridi
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Lateral and Inferior Implant Malposition in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: Incidence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Megan Fracol; Cecil S Qiu; Wen-Kuan Chiu; Lauren N Feld; Nikita Shah; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-21

Review 4.  Human Adipose Tissue Derivatives as a Potent Native Biomaterial for Tissue Regenerative Therapies.

Authors:  Siva Sankari Sharath; Janarthanan Ramu; Shantikumar Vasudevan Nair; Subramaniya Iyer; Ullas Mony; Jayakumar Rangasamy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 5.  Revision Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Brad D Denney; Alvin B Cohn; Jeremy W Bosworth; Pallavi A Kumbla
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Dual pedicle mastopexy technique for reorientation of volume and shape after subglandular and submuscular breast implant removal.

Authors:  Raffi Gurunluoglu; Edward Kubek; Jamie Arton
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-09-16

Review 7.  Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Hugh Logan Ellis; Oluwatosin Asaolu; Vivien Nebo; Abdul Kasem
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years.

Authors:  Felix J Paprottka; Nicco Krezdorn; Heiko Sorg; Sören Könneker; Stiliano Bontikous; Ian Robertson; Christopher L Schlett; Nils-Kristian Dohse; Detlev Hebebrand
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2017-06-12

9.  The Use of Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Single-stage, Implant-based Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A 2-center Retrospective Outcome Study.

Authors:  Yew L Loo; Sajjad Haider
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-06

10.  Four-step Augmentation Mastopexy: Lift and Augmentation at Single Time (LAST).

Authors:  Marcelo T Ono; Bruno M Karner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.