Literature DB >> 23628891

Assessment of subacromial space and its relationship with scapular upward rotation in college baseball players.

Stephen John Thomas1, Charles Buz Swanik, Thomas W Kaminski, Jill S Higginson, Kathleen A Swanik, Levon N Nazarian.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Subacromial impingement is a common injury in baseball players and has been linked to a reduction in the subacromial space. In addition, it has been suggested that decreases in scapular upward rotation will lead to decreases in the subacromial space and ultimately impingement syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between acromiohumeral distance and scapular upward rotation in healthy college baseball players.
DESIGN: Posttest-only study design.
SETTING: Controlled laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: 24 healthy college baseball players. INTERVENTION: Participants were measured for all dependent variables at preseason. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acromiohumeral distance at rest and 90° of abduction was measured with a diagnostic ultrasound unit. Scapular upward rotation at rest and 90° of abduction was measured with a digital inclinometer.
RESULTS: Dominant-arm acromiohumeral distance at rest and 90° of abduction (P = .694, P = .840) was not significantly different than in the nondominant arm. In addition, there was not a significant correlation between acromiohumeral distance and scapular upward rotation at rest and 90° of abduction for either the dominant or the nondominant arm.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the acromiohumeral distance is not adapting in the dominant arm in healthy throwing athletes. In addition, a relationship was not identified between acromiohumeral distance and scapular upward rotation, which was previously suggested. These results may suggest that changes that are typically seen in an injured population may be occurring due to the injury and are not preexisting. In addition, scapular upward rotation may not be the only contributing factor to acromiohumeral distance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23628891     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.22.3.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  5 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Quantifying acromiohumeral distance in elite male field hockey players compared to a non-athletic population.

Authors:  Fran Vanderstukken; Annelies Maenhout; Valentien Spanhove; Nick Jansen; Tom Mertens; Ann Marcelle Cools
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Shoulder-Rotator Strength, Range of Motion, and Acromiohumeral Distance in Asymptomatic Adolescent Volleyball Attackers.

Authors:  Gulcan Harput; Hande Guney; Ugur Toprak; Tunca Kaya; Fatma Filiz Colakoglu; Gul Baltaci
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Shoulder pain and ultrasound findings: A comparison study of wheelchair athletes, nonathletic wheelchair users, and nonwheelchair users.

Authors:  Jennifer A Soo Hoo; Hyungtaek Kim; Julia Fram; Yen-Sheng Lin; Christopher Page; Imaani Easthausen; Prakash Jayabalan
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.218

5.  The comparison of acromiohumeral distance and scapular dyskinesis prevalence in females with and without rounded shoulder posture.

Authors:  Afsun Nodehi Moghadam; Elham Sarabadani Tafreshi; Shima Abdollahi; Enayatollah Bakhshi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-03-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.