INTRODUCTION: Nuclear EGFR (nEGFR) has been identified in various human tumor tissues, including cancers of the breast, ovary, oropharynx, and esophagus, and has predicted poor patient outcomes. We sought to determine if protein expression of nEGFR is prognostic in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Resected stages I and II NSCLC specimens were evaluated for nEGFR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cases with at least one replicate core containing ≥5% of tumor cells demonstrating strong dot-like nucleolar EGFR expression were scored as nEGFR positive. RESULTS: Twenty-three (26.1% of the population) of 88 resected specimens stained positively for nEGFR. Nuclear EGFR protein expression was associated with higher disease stage (45.5% of stage II vs. 14.5% of stage I; p = 0.023), histology (41.7% in squamous cell carcinoma vs. 17.1% in adenocarcinoma; p = 0.028), shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS 8.7 months [95% CI 5.1-10.7 mo] for nEGFR positive vs. 14.5 months [95% CI 9.5-17.4 mo] for nEGFR negative; hazard ratio (HR) of 1.89 [95% CI 1.15-3.10]; p = 0.011), and shorter overall survival (OS) (median OS 14.1 months [95% CI 10.3-22.7 mo] for nEGFR positive vs. 23.4 months [95% CI 20.1-29.4 mo] for nEGFR negative; HR of 1.83 [95% CI 1.12-2.99]; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of nEGFR protein was associated with higher stage and squamous cell histology, and predicted shorter PFS and OS, in this patient cohort. Nuclear EGFR serves as a useful independent prognostic variable and as a potential therapeutic target in NSCLC.
INTRODUCTION: Nuclear EGFR (nEGFR) has been identified in various humantumor tissues, including cancers of the breast, ovary, oropharynx, and esophagus, and has predicted poor patient outcomes. We sought to determine if protein expression of nEGFR is prognostic in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Resected stages I and II NSCLC specimens were evaluated for nEGFR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cases with at least one replicate core containing ≥5% of tumor cells demonstrating strong dot-like nucleolar EGFR expression were scored as nEGFR positive. RESULTS: Twenty-three (26.1% of the population) of 88 resected specimens stained positively for nEGFR. Nuclear EGFR protein expression was associated with higher disease stage (45.5% of stage II vs. 14.5% of stage I; p = 0.023), histology (41.7% in squamous cell carcinoma vs. 17.1% in adenocarcinoma; p = 0.028), shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS 8.7 months [95% CI 5.1-10.7 mo] for nEGFR positive vs. 14.5 months [95% CI 9.5-17.4 mo] for nEGFR negative; hazard ratio (HR) of 1.89 [95% CI 1.15-3.10]; p = 0.011), and shorter overall survival (OS) (median OS 14.1 months [95% CI 10.3-22.7 mo] for nEGFR positive vs. 23.4 months [95% CI 20.1-29.4 mo] for nEGFR negative; HR of 1.83 [95% CI 1.12-2.99]; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of nEGFR protein was associated with higher stage and squamous cell histology, and predicted shorter PFS and OS, in this patient cohort. Nuclear EGFR serves as a useful independent prognostic variable and as a potential therapeutic target in NSCLC.
Authors: Amanda Psyrri; Ziwei Yu; Paul M Weinberger; Clarence Sasaki; Bruce Haffty; Robert Camp; David Rimm; Barbara Ann Burtness Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Klaus Dittmann; Claus Mayer; Birgit Fehrenbacher; Martin Schaller; Uma Raju; Luka Milas; David J Chen; Rainer Kehlbach; H Peter Rodemann Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Shirin Khambata-Ford; Christopher T Harbison; Lowell L Hart; Melissa Awad; Li-An Xu; Christine E Horak; Shaker Dakhil; Robert C Hermann; Thomas J Lynch; Martin R Weber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Georgios Kallifatidis; Daniel Munoz; Rajendra Kumar Singh; Nicole Salazar; James J Hoy; Bal L Lokeshwar Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Wan-Fu Wu; Li Wang; Nicholas Spetsieris; Myrto Boukovala; Eleni Efstathiou; Clemens Brössner; Margaret Warner; Jan-Ake Gustafsson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ye Yuan; Si Chen; Tatjana Paunesku; Sophie Charlotte Gleber; William C Liu; Caroline B Doty; Rachel Mak; Junjing Deng; Qiaoling Jin; Barry Lai; Keith Brister; Claus Flachenecker; Chris Jacobsen; Stefan Vogt; Gayle E Woloschak Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 15.881