Literature DB >> 20100958

Analysis of potential predictive markers of cetuximab benefit in BMS099, a phase III study of cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Shirin Khambata-Ford1, Christopher T Harbison, Lowell L Hart, Melissa Awad, Li-An Xu, Christine E Horak, Shaker Dakhil, Robert C Hermann, Thomas J Lynch, Martin R Weber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab is efficacious in multiple tumor types. Patient selection with markers predictive of benefit may enhance its therapeutic index. This retrospective, correlative analysis of the phase III trial BMS099 of cetuximab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted to identify molecular markers for the selection of patients most likely to benefit from cetuximab. METHODS In BMS099, 676 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV NSCLC of any histology or EGFR expression status were randomly assigned to taxane/carboplatin (T/C) with or without cetuximab. Biomarkers analyzed included K-Ras and EGFR mutations by direct sequencing, EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and EGFR gene copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Relationships between biomarker status and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR) were assessed by log-rank tests per treatment arm for treatment-specific effects and across the total evaluable population. Results Tumor samples were available from 225 randomly assigned patients. K-Ras mutations were found in 17% of evaluable patients (35 of 202 patients), EGFR mutations were found in 10% (17 of 166 patients), EGFR positivity by IHC was found in 89% (131 of 148 patients), and FISH positivity was found in 52% (54 of 104 patients). No significant associations were found between biomarker status and PFS, OS, and ORR in the treatment-specific analyses. CONCLUSION In contrast with colorectal cancer, and within the limitations of the data set, efficacy parameters did not appear to correlate with K-Ras mutation status or with any of the EGFR-related biomarkers evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses are essential to identify predictive markers and to optimize patient selection for cetuximab therapy in NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100958     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  84 in total

1.  Phase II selection design trial of concurrent chemotherapy and cetuximab versus chemotherapy followed by cetuximab in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group study S0342.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Karen Kelly; Kari Chansky; Philip C Mack; Wilbur A Franklin; Fred R Hirsch; James N Atkins; Shaker R Dakhil; Kathy S Albain; Edward S Kim; Mary Redman; John J Crowley; David R Gandara
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  [RTOG study 0324: Cetuximab in combination with chemoradiation in patients with stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer].

Authors:  C Nieder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Targeted therapies: Biomarkers in NSCLC for selecting cetuximab therapy.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  A pilot study of volume measurement as a method of tumor response evaluation to aid biomarker development.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Chaya S Moskowitz; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Pingzhen Guo; Valerie M Rusch; Marc Ladanyi; Naiyer A Rizvi; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer--is it becoming a reality?

Authors:  Filip Janku; David J Stewart; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving landscape.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Robert A Figlin; Karen Reckamp
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Molecular testing in lung cancer: the time is now.

Authors:  Haiying Cheng; Xunhai Xu; Daniel B Costa; Charles A Powell; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Prioritization in comparative effectiveness research: the CANCERGEN Experience.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; William Wong; Josh J Carlson; Louis Garrison; Scott Ramsey; Patricia A Deverka; Laura Esmail; Sneha Rangarao; Carolyn J Hoban; Laurence H Baker; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Design of a phase III clinical trial with prospective biomarker validation: SWOG S0819.

Authors:  Mary W Redman; John J Crowley; Roy S Herbst; Fred R Hirsch; David R Gandara
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The efficacy of first-line chemotherapy is associated with KRAS mutation status in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaxiong Zhang; Wenfeng Fang; Yue Yan; Mengyao Wang; Shiyang Kang; Jin Sheng; Jianhua Zhan; Nan Chen; Shaodong Hong; Yunpeng Yang; Yuxiang Ma; Dacheng He; Tao Qin; Ting Zhou; Yanna Tang; Xiaobo He; Wenhua Liang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.