Literature DB >> 23627829

Reassessing direct-to-consumer portrayals of unproven stem cell therapies: is it getting better?

Ubaka Ogbogu1, Christen Rachul, Timothy Caulfield.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether increased scrutiny of 'stem cell tourism' has resulted in changes to online claims by clinics that provide putative unproven stem cell treatments. MATERIALS &
METHODS: We analyzed historical and current versions of clinics' websites. The study sample consisted of 18 websites included in a 2008 peer-reviewed study and an additional 12 clinics identified through the Google™ search engine.
RESULTS: Our analysis revealed similarities between historical and current stem cell treatment offerings, claims, representations of risk, benefit and efficacy and attention to social, ethical and regulatory concerns. Claims and representations remain overly optimistic. Current websites provide more detailed descriptions of treatment procedures and outcomes and are more aesthetically appealing. Noteworthy trends in the movements and locations of clinics was observed.
CONCLUSION: Increased scrutiny of stem cell tourism has not had much impact on the online claims of clinics that provide putative unproven stem cell treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23627829     DOI: 10.2217/rme.13.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regen Med        ISSN: 1746-0751            Impact factor:   3.806


  20 in total

1.  Perspectives on strategies and challenges in the conversation about stem cells for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K J Jacob; B K Kwon; C Lo; J Snyder; J Illes
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Ethics and policy issues for stem cell research and pulmonary medicine.

Authors:  Justin Lowenthal; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Representations of stem cell clinics on Twitter.

Authors:  Kalina Kamenova; Amir Reshef; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 4.  Concise Review: A Comprehensive Analysis of Reported Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Unproven Stem Cell-Based Interventions.

Authors:  Gerhard Bauer; Magdi Elsallab; Mohamed Abou-El-Enein
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 6.940

5.  Unproven Stem Cell-Based Interventions: Advancing Policy through Stakeholder Collaboration.

Authors:  Kirstin R W Matthews; Ana S Iltis
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-06-01

6.  Challenging misinformation and engaging patients: characterizing a regenerative medicine consult service.

Authors:  Cambray Smith; Charlene Martin-Lillie; Jennifer Dens Higano; Leigh Turner; Sydney Phu; Jennifer Arthurs; Timothy J Nelson; Shane Shapiro; Zubin Master
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  A Dichotomy of Information-Seeking and Information-Trusting: Stem Cell Interventions and Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Kimberly Sharpe; Nina Di Pietro; Karen J Jacob; Judy Illes
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.739

8.  Unproven stem cell-based interventions & physicians' professional obligations; a qualitative study with medical regulatory authorities in Canada.

Authors:  Amy Zarzeczny; Marianne Clark
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Evaluating the Quality of Website Information of Private-Practice Clinics Offering Cell Therapies in Japan.

Authors:  Hidenori Kashihara; Takeo Nakayama; Taichi Hatta; Naomi Takahashi; Misao Fujita
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Professional regulation: a potentially valuable tool in responding to "stem cell tourism".

Authors:  Amy Zarzeczny; Timothy Caulfield; Ubaka Ogbogu; Peter Bell; Valorie A Crooks; Kalina Kamenova; Zubin Master; Christen Rachul; Jeremy Snyder; Maeghan Toews; Sonja Zoeller
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 7.765

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.