Literature DB >> 23626610

The relationship between MDM2 expression and tumor thickness and invasion in primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Parvin Rajabi1, Paridokht Karimian, Mitra Heidarpour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma is the most invasive cutaneous tumor which is associated with an incredibly high mortality rate. The most reliable histological factors associated with melanoma prognosis are tumor thickness- measured by the Breslow index- and invasion depth- measured by Clark level. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene inhibits p53-dependent apoptosis. An increase in MDM2 expression has been found in many tumors. This study aimed to investigate MDM2 expression and its correlation with tumor thickness and invasion level in malignant melanoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluated paraffin blocks from 43 randomly selected patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who referred to the main university pathology center in Isfahan, Iran. MDM2 expression rate was assessed via immunohistochemical techniques and hematoxylin and eosin staining to determine tumor thickness and invasion level. Correlations between MDM2 expression and tumor thickness and invasion were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient in SPSS17.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61.2 ± 15 years. Men and women constituted 55.8% and 44.2% of the participants, respectively. The rate of MDM2 positivity was 28.9%. MDM2 expression was directly associated with tumor thickness (r = 0.425; p = 0.002) and weakly with invasion level (r = 0.343; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low MDM2 expression rate observed in this study, direct relationships between MDM2 positivity and tumor thickness and invasion level were identified. MDM2 expression can thus be suggested as a potential new predictive prognostic factor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Melanoma; Murine Double Minute 2; Prognosis

Year:  2012        PMID: 23626610      PMCID: PMC3634271     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Med Sci        ISSN: 1735-1995            Impact factor:   1.852


INTRODUCTION

The incidence of melanoma has continued to increase worldwide. Incidence rates vary with respect to age and gender. While melanoma is more common in women than in men prior to 50 years of age, this trend reverses after age 50.[1-5] Although melanoma accounts for roughly 4% of all skin cancers, it is responsible for more than 74% of skin cancer deaths.[6] Tumor thickness, as defined by the Breslow index, is the most important histological prognostic factor of melanoma and is measured vertically in millimeters from the top of the granular layer (or base of superficial ulceration) to the deepest point of tumoral involvement. Increased tumor thickness suggests a higher metastatic potential and a poorer prognosis.[34] The Clark level on the other hand, is a measure of the anatomical invasion of the tumor and appears to affect prognosis only in thinner (<1 mm of depth) melanomas.[5] Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a 491 amino acid protein that functions as a key regulator of P53 by binding to its N-terminus, inhibiting its transcriptional activity, and promoting its degradation.[78] MDM2 overexpression or hyperactivation directly contributes to loss of p53 function during the development of nearly 50% of human cancers.[9] Amplification of the genetic locus of MDM2 is a common event in several tumors including glioma, liposarcoma, osteosarcoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and germ cell tumors.[10-14] The MDM2 immunoreactivity of tumoral cells has also been shown to be potentially correlated with the outcome.[1516] A strong correlation between MDM2 expression and progressive disease has also been demonstrated.[1718] Most previous studies have used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for their analyses. However, we used immunohistochemical techniques because finding a significant correlation between MDM2 expression and tumor thickness and invasion would introduce a predictive prognostic marker for cutaneous malignant melanoma. Therefore, the relationship between MDM2 expression and tumor thickness and invasion in primary cutaneous malignant melanoma was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive analytical study on specimens from 43 randomly selected patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma who had undergone surgery or biopsy at Alzahra Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) during 2005-11. The study included 24 men and 19 women who aged 32-89 years. All paraffin blocks of the patients were studied and the most appropriate ones were selected. Afterwards, 2 slides were made from each block to be either stained with hematoxylin and eosin, or subjected to immunohistochemical analysis using a mouse monoclonal MDM2 antibody (NCL-MDM2, Novocastra). Based on manufacturer instructions, immunohistochemical staining was performed using the following stages: 1) H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) stage; 2) incubation of the tissue with the primary MDM2 antibody for 30 minutes; 3) incubation with polymer (EnVision; secondary antibody) for 30 minutes; and 4) incubation with diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen substrate solution for 5 minutes. At every stage, after the application of the above-mentioned materials, the slides were washed with a buffer solution or distilled water. For further staining, hematoxylin was employed and finally copper sulfate 0.5% was applied for two minutes. Next, the slides stained with MDM2 were assessed. The percentage of immunoreactive nuclei was evaluated by counting at least 500 cells using the ×40 objective lens.[1819] Positive controls included cases of colon carcinoma. Negative controls were obtained by omitting the primary monoclonal antibody. The stained slides were scored based on stain intensity and stainability. The scores were defined as positive when there was nuclear staining in at least 10% of neoplastic cells. Such slides were categorized as weak, moderate, or strong based on their intensity.[1819] Associations between the intensity of MDM2 expresion and the depth of invasion (Clark level) and tumor thickness (according to Breslow index) were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficients. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. SPSS17 was used for analyses.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients, 24 (55.8%) were men and 19 (44.2%) were women. A Mann-Whitney test revealed no significant correlation between the intensity of MDM2 expression in men and women (p = 0.495). The mean Breslow index values for men and women were 1.96 ± 0.33 and 1.67 ± 0.34, respectively. An independent t-test revealed no significant difference between men and women (p = 0.538). After calculating the relative frequency distribution of MDM2 expression intensity, 31 patients (72.1%) were negative, while 5 patients (11.6%), 2 patients (4.7%), and 5 patients (11.6%) were positive with weak, moderate, and strong intensity staining, respectively. In terms of the frequency distribution of tumor thickness, 13 patients (30.2%) had tumors < 0.76 mm thick, 10 patients (23.3%) had tumors 0.76-1.5 mm thick, and 20 patients (46.5%) had tumors thicker than 1.5 mm. Spearman's correlation analysis indicated a direct relationship between tumor thickness (assessed by the Breslow index) and MDM2 expression intensity (r = 0.425; p = 0.002) (Table 1).
Table 1

Association between murine double minute 2 (MDM2) expression and Breslow index

Association between murine double minute 2 (MDM2) expression and Breslow index The level of invasion (assessed by Clark level) in the participants was classified as level I in 10 patients (23.3%), level II in 7 patients (16.3%), level III in 8 patients (18.6%), level IV in 8 patients, and level V in 10 patients (23.3%). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a direct relationship between MDM2 expression intensity and Clark's level of invasion (r = 0.43; p = 0.01) (Table 2).
Table 2

Association between murine double minute 2 (MDM2) expression and Clark's level of invasion

Association between murine double minute 2 (MDM2) expression and Clark's level of invasion

DISCUSSION

Melanoma is the cause of 74% of deaths from cutaneous cancers. Increased MDM2 expression has been observed in 50% of human cancers, including glioma, osteosarcoma, and liposarcoma. A few studies have investigated the MDM2 expression rate in malignant melanoma and its association with prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. In a study conducted by Hernberg et al., the MDM2 expression rate was, on average, low, and therefore the diagnostic significance of this factor was questioned. However, there was a significant correlation between tumor development and MDM2 overexpression.[20] In 2006, Muthusam et al. observed high-level amplification of the 12q13-15 region, a MDM2 locus site, in 3 of 53 patients with melanoma. Their analysis of mRNA and protein levels (MDM2) also revealed overexpression of the MDM2 target gene.[11] In 2000, Coupland et al. studied the prognostic significance of a number of factors, including MDM2, in 92 patients with uveal melanoma using an immunohistochemical technique. Their results revealed a significant correlation between MDM2 expression and clinical outcome (odds ratio = 2.1; p = 0.13).[18] In 2008, Firoz et al. used PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) to investigate a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP309) of the MDM2 gene. They suggested an increased risk of melanoma, especially in postmenopausal women.[6] As these previous studies have shown, increased MDM2 expression has only been observed in a limited number of patients with malignant melanoma. In addition, immunohistochemical techniques have revealed low average MDM2 expression rates. In this study, MDM2 expression rate was also low (28%), suggesting that MDM2 is not an appropriate diagnostic factor in melanoma. In two previous studies conducted to determine immunohistochemical factors prognostic for cutaneous malignant melanoma and its clinical outcome, a strong association between MDM2 expression intensity and prognosis was observed. Similarly, direct associations between MDM2 expression intensity and tumor thickness (the most important histological prognostic factor) and Clark's level of invasion were observed in the current study.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, considering the importance of immunohistochemical approaches in determining the prognosis of a large number of tumors including melanoma, this study could be clinically useful for assessing prognostic factors among patients with malignant melanoma.
  20 in total

1.  Correlation of seven biological factors (Hsp90a, p53, MDM2, Bcl-2, Bax, Cytochrome C, and Cleaved caspase3) with clinical outcomes of ALK+ anaplastic large-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Hui Ling Li; Xue Ping Huang; Xin Hua Zhou; Tian Hai Ji; Zi Qing Wu; Zhi Qiang Wang; Hui Yong Jiang; Fan Rong Liu; Tong Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Environ Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Structure-based design of high affinity peptides inhibiting the interaction of p53 with MDM2 and MDMX.

Authors:  Jason Phan; Zhenyu Li; Agnieszka Kasprzak; Baozong Li; Said Sebti; Wayne Guida; Ernst Schönbrunn; Jiandong Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Molecular aspects of melanoma.

Authors:  Philip D Da Forno; Gerald S Saldanha
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression.

Authors:  W H Clark; D E Elder; D Guerry; L E Braitman; B J Trock; D Schultz; M Synnestvedt; A C Halpern
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The prognostic value of cyclin D1, p53, and MDM2 protein expression in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  S E Coupland; G Anastassiou; A Stang; H Schilling; I Anagnostopoulos; N Bornfeld; H Stein
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR.

Authors:  Nicolas Sirvent; Jean-Michel Coindre; Georges Maire; Isabelle Hostein; Frédérique Keslair; Louis Guillou; Dominique Ranchere-Vince; Philippe Terrier; Florence Pedeutour
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Cutaneous melanoma: prognosis and treatment results worldwide.

Authors:  C M Balch
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

9.  Association of MDM2 SNP309, age of onset, and gender in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Elnaz F Firoz; Melanie Warycha; Jan Zakrzewski; Danuta Pollens; Guimin Wang; Richard Shapiro; Russell Berman; Anna Pavlick; Prashiela Manga; Harry Ostrer; Julide Tok Celebi; Hideko Kamino; Farbod Darvishian; Linda Rolnitzky; Judith D Goldberg; Iman Osman; David Polsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  MDM2 overexpression is rare in ovarian carcinoma irrespective of TP53 mutation status.

Authors:  W D Foulkes; G W Stamp; S Afzal; N Lalani; C P McFarlane; J Trowsdale; I G Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inhibition of human melanoma growth by a non-cardioselective β-blocker.

Authors:  Ludovic J Wrobel; Frederique Anne Le Gal
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  The complementary effect of rs1042522 in TP53 and rs1805007 in MC1R is associated with an elevated risk of cutaneous melanoma in Latvian population.

Authors:  Aija Ozola; Dace Ruklisa; Dace Pjanova
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Expression levels of FBXW7 and MDM2 E3 ubiquitin ligases and their c-Myc and p53 substrates in patients with dysplastic nevi or melanoma.

Authors:  Julija Mozuraitiene; Zivile Gudleviciene; Ieva Vincerzevskiene; Aida Laurinaviciene; Justinas Pamedys
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.