| Literature DB >> 23626591 |
Evelyn Guirado1, Larry S Schlesinger.
Abstract
Granulomas are the hallmark of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infection and thus sit at the center of tuberculosis (TB) immunopathogenesis. TB can result from either early progression of a primary granuloma during the infection process or reactivation of an established granuloma in a latently infected person. Granulomas are compact, organized aggregates of immune cells consisting of blood-derived infected and uninfected macrophages, foamy macrophages, epithelioid cells (uniquely differentiated macrophages), and multinucleated giant cells (Langerhans cells) surrounded by a ring of lymphocytes. The granuloma's main function is to localize and contain M.tb while concentrating the immune response to a limited area. However, complete eradication does not occur since M.tb has its own strategies to persist within the granuloma and to reactivate and escape under certain conditions. Thus M.tb-containing granulomas represent a unique battlefield for dictating both the host immune and bacterial response. The architecture, composition, function, and maintenance of granulomas are key aspects to study since they are expected to have a profound influence on M.tb physiology in this niche. Granulomas are not only present in mycobacterial infections; they can be found in many other infectious and non-infectious diseases and play a crucial role in immunity and disease. Here we review the models currently available to study the granulomatous response to M.tb.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; granuloma; model; pathogenesis; tuberculosis
Year: 2013 PMID: 23626591 PMCID: PMC3631743 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Typical architecture of a TB granuloma. (A) Representative granuloma with central necrosis from minipig lung tissue. Histological samples were formalin-fixed, cut, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Adapted from Gil et al. (2010). (B) Schematic of the cellular constituents of a TB granuloma.
Models to study .
| Models | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Mice | Inexpensive, easy to handle, genetic variant strains, large number of immunological tools, and reagents available | Lack of necrosis, lack of cell structure and organization that resemble human granulomas; lack of true latency |
| Guinea pig/rabbit | Easy to handle, necrosis | Limited availability of immunological tools; lack of true latency |
| Non-human primate | Lesions similar to human, LTBI established | Difficult to handle, dedicated veterinarian staff required, expensive, ethical concerns |
| Minipig | Pulmonary structure similar to humans, LTBI established, lesions similar to humans | Difficult to handle, dedicated veterinarian staff required, expensive, limited availability of immunological tools |
| Zebrafish embryo | Easy to handle, live, real time imaging, excellent to study initial steps of granuloma formation | |
| Mimics human granuloma structure, flexible (mycobacterial strains, manipulate with, e.g., cytokines, drugs), amenable to manipulation experimentally, use for drug screening | Lack of lung structure and full tissue microenvironmental conditions | |
| Inexpensive, flexible, long-term experiments with multiple, complex factors can be quickly performed; hypothesis-generating | Highly dependent on the parameters chosen, requires previous observations in different systems to extrapolate, can miss unknown factors, often not tested or proven |
*.