| Literature DB >> 23626513 |
Yasuharu Mori1, Kazunari Akagi, Masaaki Yano, Hiroshi Sashiyama, Osamu Tsutsumi, Yukihiro Hamahata, Yasunobu Tsujinaka, Akihiko Tsuchida, Jun Matsubayashi.
Abstract
A 70-year-old female underwent follow-up colonoscopy after colonic polypectomy. The colonoscopy revealed the presence of a 7-mm submucosal tumor in the sigmoid colon. The tumor surface was smooth and covered with normal mucosa. It was diagnosed as a submucosal tumor, and polypectomy was performed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 2 × 5 × 3 mm with marked peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration and lymphoid follicle formation. It was diagnosed as carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma), SM (1,800 μm), ly2, v0, budding; grade 1. We confirmed the indication for noncurative additional surgical resection and performed laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. No metastases were observed in the dissected lymph nodes.Entities:
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; Colon cancer; Epstein-Barr virus; Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma; Lymphoid stroma
Year: 2013 PMID: 23626513 PMCID: PMC3617975 DOI: 10.1159/000348765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Gastroenterol ISSN: 1662-0631
Fig. 1Colonoscopy findings. a An elevated submucosal tumor is observed in the sigmoid colon. b After indigo carmine irrigation. There is no central depression on the tumor surface, which is covered with normal mucosa.
Fig. 2Microscopic examination. a Lymphoid follicle formation is observed in the cancer cell nest circumference (HE, loupe). b An infiltrative growth suggestive of moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma is observed in the submucosa (HE, ×4).
Fig. 3D2-40 staining reveals a cancer cell nest in the lymphatic vessel (×20).
Reported cases of LELC of the colon
| Reference (first author) | Age, years | Sex | Location | Size, mm | Pathology | ISH (EBV) | T | N | ly | v |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vilor, 1995 [ | 77 | ♀ | T/C | 120 | por | negative | SS | – | – | – |
| Samaha, 1998 [ | 62 | ♂ | Ce | 28×27×5 | tub2 | negative | SS | 1 | ||
| De Petris, 1999 [ | 44 | ♂ | A/C | 9 | tub1 | negative | ||||
| Kon, 2001 [ | 72 | ♂ | R | 20×25×7 | por | positive | MP | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Kojima, 2007 [ | 25 | ♂ | S/C | 7 | por | negative | SM | 0 | ||
| Delaney, 2012 [ | 85 | ♀ | S/C | 42×30×15 | por | negative | MP | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Our case, 2012 | 70 | ♀ | S/C | 2×5×3 | tub2~por | negative | SM | 0 | 2 | 0 |
ISH = In situ hybridization.
Fig. 4EBV was not detected by in situ hybridization in the tumor cell, but was found in surrounding lymphocytes and nuclear (×20).