BACKGROUND: Anticancer therapies cause a wide range of dermatologic adverse events (AE). Although the frequency and severity of these events have been described, their effects on health-related quality of life (QoL) remain poorly understood, and the ones having a greater impact have not been ascertained. OBJECTIVE: To assess QoL in patients on conventional versus targeted anti-cancer therapies using a dermatology-specific questionnaire. METHODS: Patients (n = 283) completed the Skindex-16, a QoL questionnaire measuring the effects on three domains: symptoms, emotions, and function. Patients were grouped into two categories according to the types of oncology treatments received: (1) targeted therapies and (2) non-targeted therapies. Correlations of Skindex-16 scores with type of anti-cancer therapy, number of AEs, and specific dermatologic AEs were investigated. RESULTS: Significant differences between patients treated with targeted versus non-targeted therapy with regards to total Skindex-16 (p = 0.02) and emotion subdomain (p = 0.02) scores were observed. Additionally, patients on targeted therapies experienced a significantly greater number of AEs (p < 0.001) compared with patients on non-targeted therapies. Patients who exhibited epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced rash had higher Skindex-16 scores (p = 0.009) and higher scores in the symptom (p < 0.001), emotion (p = 0.01), and function (p = 0.001) subdomains than patients without this AE. Similar results were observed for pruritus. All p values were two sided. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic AEs are associated with a diminished QoL. Targeted therapies are associated with a significantly increased number of AEs and worse total and emotion Skindex-16 scores in comparison with non-targeted therapies. EGFR inhibitor rash and pruritus produced the greatest negative impact.
BACKGROUND: Anticancer therapies cause a wide range of dermatologic adverse events (AE). Although the frequency and severity of these events have been described, their effects on health-related quality of life (QoL) remain poorly understood, and the ones having a greater impact have not been ascertained. OBJECTIVE: To assess QoL in patients on conventional versus targeted anti-cancer therapies using a dermatology-specific questionnaire. METHODS:Patients (n = 283) completed the Skindex-16, a QoL questionnaire measuring the effects on three domains: symptoms, emotions, and function. Patients were grouped into two categories according to the types of oncology treatments received: (1) targeted therapies and (2) non-targeted therapies. Correlations of Skindex-16 scores with type of anti-cancer therapy, number of AEs, and specific dermatologic AEs were investigated. RESULTS: Significant differences between patients treated with targeted versus non-targeted therapy with regards to total Skindex-16 (p = 0.02) and emotion subdomain (p = 0.02) scores were observed. Additionally, patients on targeted therapies experienced a significantly greater number of AEs (p < 0.001) compared with patients on non-targeted therapies. Patients who exhibited epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced rash had higher Skindex-16 scores (p = 0.009) and higher scores in the symptom (p < 0.001), emotion (p = 0.01), and function (p = 0.001) subdomains than patients without this AE. Similar results were observed for pruritus. All p values were two sided. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic AEs are associated with a diminished QoL. Targeted therapies are associated with a significantly increased number of AEs and worse total and emotion Skindex-16 scores in comparison with non-targeted therapies. EGFR inhibitor rash and pruritus produced the greatest negative impact.
Authors: Janelle N Ruiz; Viswanath Reddy Belum; Christine B Boers-Doets; Mini Kamboj; N Esther Babady; Yi-Wei Tang; Tulio A Valdez; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alexander Drilon; Anne A Eaton; Katja Schindler; Mrinal M Gounder; David R Spriggs; Pamela Harris; S Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos; Mario E Lacouture; David M Hyman Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Viswanath Reddy Belum; Courtney Washington; Christine A Pratilas; Vincent Sibaud; Franck Boralevi; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Alexandre Chan; Michael C Cameron; Benjamin Garden; Christine B Boers-Doets; Katja Schindler; Joel B Epstein; Jennifer Choi; Laura Beamer; Eric Roeland; Elvio G Russi; René-Jean Bensadoun; Yi Ling Teo; Raymond J Chan; Vivianne Shih; Jane Bryce; Judith Raber-Durlacher; Peter Arne Gerber; César O Freytes; Bernardo Rapoport; Nicole LeBoeuf; Vincent Sibaud; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Gregory S Phillips; Azael Freites-Martinez; Meier Hsu; Anna Skripnik Lucas; Dulce M Barrios; Kathryn Ciccolini; Michael A Marchetti; Liang Deng; Patricia L Myskowski; Erica H Lee; Alina Markova; Mario E Lacouture Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Julia Dai; Viswanath R Belum; Shenhong Wu; Vincent Sibaud; Mario E Lacouture Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Julia D Ransohoff; Azadeh Nikfarjam; Erik Jones; Brian Loew; Bernice Y Kwong; Kavita Y Sarin; Nigam H Shah Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: D M Barrios; G S Phillips; A Freites-Martinez; M Hsu; K Ciccolini; A Skripnik Lucas; M A Marchetti; A M Rossi; E H Lee; L Deng; A Markova; P L Myskowski; M E Lacouture Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Janelle Nicole Ruiz; Viswanath Reddy Belum; Patricia Creel; Allen Cohn; Michael Ewer; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 2.872