Rashed Al Bannay1, Michael Böhm, Aysha Husain. 1. Cardiology Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, PO Box 12, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain. abdullarashed@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical significance of presenting blood pressure parameters and heart rate in patients with hypertensive crisis. METHODS: In patients admitted with hypertensive crisis between January 2011 and May 2011, demography, mode of presentation, co-morbidities, blood pressure readings, and heart rate at presentation were documented. Further clustering of hypertensive crisis into emergency or urgency was based on the presence or absence of target organ involvement. The relationship between blood pressure parameters, heart rate, and other variables was analyzed. RESULTS: 189 patients in sinus rhythm were enrolled in this pilot study. The rate of hypertensive urgency was 56 %, whereas the rate of hypertensive emergency was 44 %, respectively. Subjects with hypertensive emergency had a higher mean heart rate (93 ± 22.7 bpm) than those with urgency (81 ± 11.5 bpm) (P = 0.015). Women had higher heart rates (92 ± 18.5 bpm) than men (86 ± 17.6 bpm) (P = 0.014). Heart rates below 100 bpm had a specificity of 94 %, classifying patients as hypertensive urgency. Tachycardia had a powerful statistical association with hypertensive left ventricular failure (P < 0.0001). Other hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean blood pressure relates neither to urgency nor to emergency. Diabetic patients with HBA1c levels of more than 53 mmol/mol had a heart rate of more than 100 bpm (P = 0.015) during hypertensive crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Normal heart rate is characteristic of hypertensive urgency. Tachycardia in this setting is an ominous sign and denotes hypertensive complications in particular left ventricular failure. Among diabetics, elevated heart rate is associated with poor glycemic control.
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical significance of presenting blood pressure parameters and heart rate in patients with hypertensive crisis. METHODS: In patients admitted with hypertensive crisis between January 2011 and May 2011, demography, mode of presentation, co-morbidities, blood pressure readings, and heart rate at presentation were documented. Further clustering of hypertensive crisis into emergency or urgency was based on the presence or absence of target organ involvement. The relationship between blood pressure parameters, heart rate, and other variables was analyzed. RESULTS: 189 patients in sinus rhythm were enrolled in this pilot study. The rate of hypertensive urgency was 56 %, whereas the rate of hypertensive emergency was 44 %, respectively. Subjects with hypertensive emergency had a higher mean heart rate (93 ± 22.7 bpm) than those with urgency (81 ± 11.5 bpm) (P = 0.015). Women had higher heart rates (92 ± 18.5 bpm) than men (86 ± 17.6 bpm) (P = 0.014). Heart rates below 100 bpm had a specificity of 94 %, classifying patients as hypertensive urgency. Tachycardia had a powerful statistical association with hypertensive left ventricular failure (P < 0.0001). Other hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean blood pressure relates neither to urgency nor to emergency. Diabeticpatients with HBA1c levels of more than 53 mmol/mol had a heart rate of more than 100 bpm (P = 0.015) during hypertensive crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Normal heart rate is characteristic of hypertensive urgency. Tachycardia in this setting is an ominous sign and denotes hypertensive complications in particular left ventricular failure. Among diabetics, elevated heart rate is associated with poor glycemic control.
Authors: Markku S Nieminen; Dirk Brutsaert; Kenneth Dickstein; Helmut Drexler; Ferenc Follath; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Matthias Hochadel; Michel Komajda; Johan Lassus; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Piotr Ponikowski; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-09-25 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: A R Dyer; V Persky; J Stamler; O Paul; R B Shekelle; D M Berkson; M Lepper; J A Schoenberger; H A Lindberg Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1980-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: D P Papadopoulos; E A Sanidas; N A Viniou; V Gennimata; V Chantziara; I Barbetseas; T K Makris Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Camila A Fleury; Vagner C Andreo; Pedro C Lomba; Thiago J Dionísio; Sandra L Amaral; Carlos F Santos; Flávio A Faria Journal: J Anesth Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Peter Bramlage; Hermann Haller; Luis M Ruilope; Michael Böhm Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.889