Literature DB >> 23624471

Effect of pressure-induced changes in the ionization equilibria of buffers on inactivation of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by high hydrostatic pressure.

Elisa Gayán1, Santiago Condón, Ignacio Álvarez, Maria Nabakabaya, Bernard Mackey.   

Abstract

Survival rates of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus after high-pressure treatment in buffers that had large or small reaction volumes (ΔV°), and which therefore underwent large or small changes in pH under pressure, were compared. At a low buffer concentration of 0.005 M, survival was, as expected, better in MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid), HEPES, and Tris, whose ΔV° values are approximately 5.0 to 7.0 cm(3) mol(-1), than in phosphate or dimethyl glutarate (DMG), whose ΔV° values are about -25 cm(3) mol(-1). However, at a concentration of 0.1 M, survival was unexpectedly better in phosphate and DMG than in MOPS, HEPES, or Tris. This was because the baroprotective effect of phosphate and DMG increased much more rapidly with increasing concentration than it did with MOPS, HEPES, or Tris. Further comparisons of survival in solutions of salts expected to cause large electrostriction effects (Na2SO4 and CaCl2) and those causing lower electrostriction (NaCl and KCl) were made. The salts with divalent ions were protective at much lower concentrations than salts with monovalent ions. Buffers and salts both protected against transient membrane disruption in E. coli, but the molar concentrations necessary for membrane protection were much lower for phosphate and Na2SO4 than for HEPES and NaCl. Possible protective mechanisms discussed include effects of electrolytes on water compressibility and kosmotropic and specific ion effects. The results of this systematic study will be of considerable practical significance in studies of pressure inactivation of microbes under defined conditions but also raise important fundamental questions regarding the mechanisms of baroprotection by ionic solutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23624471      PMCID: PMC3697583          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00469-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  27 in total

1.  Modulation of lipid phase behavior by kosmotropic and chaotropic solutes : Experiment and thermodynamic theory.

Authors:  R Koynova; J Brankov; B Tenchov
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Using LysoSensor Yellow/Blue DND-160 to sense acidic pH under high hydrostatic pressures.

Authors:  Hector Michael DePedro; Paul Urayama
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Characterization of dual-wavelength seminaphthofluorescein and seminapthorhodafluor dyes for pH sensing under high hydrostatic pressures.

Authors:  Michael Salerno; Jacob J Ajimo; Jonathan A Dudley; Katherine Binzel; Paul Urayama
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Effects of three stabilizing agents--proline, betaine, and trehalose--on membrane phospholipids.

Authors:  A S Rudolph; J H Crowe; L M Crowe
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Pressure treatment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in low-moisture environments.

Authors:  Marwen Moussa; Vincent Espinasse; Jean-Marie Perrier-Cornet; Patrick Gervais
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  In situ measurements of pH changes in beta-lactoglobulin solutions under high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Vibeke Orlien; Karsten Olsen; Leif H Skibsted
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  The Hofmeister effect in relation to membrane lipid phase stability.

Authors:  P W Sanderson; L J Lis; P J Quinn; W P Williams
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1991-08-05

8.  The relationship between membrane damage, release of protein and loss of viability in Escherichia coli exposed to high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Bernadette Klotz; Pilar Mañas; Bernard M Mackey
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Protective effect of calcium on inactivation of Escherichia coli by high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  K J Hauben; K Bernaerts; C W Michiels
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection.

Authors:  Tomoya Baba; Takeshi Ara; Miki Hasegawa; Yuki Takai; Yoshiko Okumura; Miki Baba; Kirill A Datsenko; Masaru Tomita; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influence of high hydrostatic pressure on epitope mapping of tobacco mosaic virus coat protein.

Authors:  Daniel Ferreira de Lima Neto; Carlos Francisco Sampaio Bonafe; Clarice Weis Arns
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Kinetics of Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis subsp. niger Spores and Staphylococcus albus on Paper by Chlorine Dioxide Gas in an Enclosed Space.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Jinhui Wu; Jiancheng Qi; Limei Hao; Ying Yi; Zongxing Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The efficacy and safety of high-pressure processing of food.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Luisa Peixe; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Laurence Castle; Matteo Crotta; Konrad Grob; Maria Rosaria Milana; Annette Petersen; Artur Xavier Roig Sagués; Filipa Vinagre Silva; Eric Barthélémy; Anna Christodoulidou; Winy Messens; Ana Allende
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 4.  Advances in Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry and the Pursuit of Challenging Biological Systems.

Authors:  Ellie I James; Taylor A Murphree; Clint Vorauer; John R Engen; Miklos Guttman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 72.087

5.  A pH-Dependent Gene Expression Enables Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBNC to Adapt to Acid Stress.

Authors:  Naimisha Chowdhury; Gunajit Goswami; Robin Chandra Boro; Madhumita Barooah
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  Mechanisms of pressure-mediated cell death and injury in Escherichia coli: from fundamentals to food applications.

Authors:  Michael Gänzle; Yang Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.