Literature DB >> 23623470

Bioassay of estrogenicity and chemical analyses of estrogens in streams across the United States associated with livestock operations.

D A Alvarez1, N W Shappell, L O Billey, D S Bermudez, V S Wilson, D W Kolpin, S D Perkins, N Evans, W T Foreman, J L Gray, M J Shipitalo, M T Meyer.   

Abstract

Animal manures, used as a nitrogen source for crop production, are often associated with negative impacts on nutrient levels in surface water. The concentrations of estrogens in streams from these manures also are of concern due to potential endocrine disruption in aquatic species. Streams associated with livestock operations were sampled by discrete samples (n = 38) or by time-integrated polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS, n = 19). Samples were analyzed for estrogens by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS(2)) and estrogenic activity was assessed by three bioassays: Yeast Estrogen Screen (YES), T47D-KBluc Assay, MCF-7 Estrogenicity Screen (E-Screen). Samples were collected from 19 streams within small (≈ 1-30 km(2)) watersheds in 12 U.S. states representing a range of hydrogeologic conditions, dominated by: dairy (3), grazing beef (3), feedlot cattle (1); swine (5); poultry (3); and 4 areas where no livestock were raised or manure was applied. Water samples were consistently below the United Kingdom proposed Lowest Observable Effect Concentration for 17β-estradiol in fish (10 ng/L) in all watersheds, regardless of land use. Estrogenic activity was often higher in samples during runoff conditions following a period of manure application. Estrone was the most commonly detected estrogen (13 of 38 water samples, mean 1.9, maximum 8.3 ng/L). Because of the T47D-KBluc assay's sensitivity towards estrone (1.4 times 17β-estradiol) it was the most sensitive method for detecting estrogens, followed by the E-Screen, GC-MS(2), and YES. POCIS resulted in more frequent detections of estrogens than discrete water samples across all sites, even when applying the less-sensitive YES bioassay to the POCIS extracts. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623470     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  18 in total

1.  Estrogenic contamination by manure fertilizer in organic farming: a case study with the lizard Podarcis sicula.

Authors:  Mariailaria Verderame; Ermelinda Limatola; Rosaria Scudiero
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  A landscape-based reconnaissance survey of estrogenic activity in streams of the upper Potomac, upper James, and Shenandoah Rivers, USA.

Authors:  John Young; Luke Iwanowicz; Adam Sperry; Vicki Blazer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effects of contaminants of emerging concern on Myzus persicae (Sulzer, Hemiptera: Aphididae) biology and on their host plant, Capsicum annuum.

Authors:  Marcus John Pennington; Jason A Rothman; Michael Bellinger Jones; Quinn S McFrederick; Jay Gan; John T Trumble
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluation of estrogenic activity in the Pearl River by using effect-directed analysis.

Authors:  Xiao -Wen Chen; Jian-Liang Zhao; You-Sheng Liu; Li-Xin Hu; Shuang-Shuang Liu; Guang-Guo Ying
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Occurrence and change of estrogenic activity in the process of drinking water treatment and distribution.

Authors:  Sanhua Xiao; Xuemin Lv; Yi Lu; Xiaoming Yang; Xiaorong Dong; Kunpeng Ma; Yifan Zeng; Tao Jin; Fei Tang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Contaminants of emerging concern affect Trichoplusia ni growth and development on artificial diets and a key host plant.

Authors:  Marcus J Pennington; Jason A Rothman; Stacia L Dudley; Michael B Jones; Quinn S McFrederick; Jay Gan; John T Trumble
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reconnaissance of Mixed Organic and Inorganic Chemicals in Private and Public Supply Tapwaters at Selected Residential and Workplace Sites in the United States.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Dana W Kolpin; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Juliane B Brown; Mary C Cardon; Kurt D Carpenter; Steven R Corsi; Laura A DeCicco; Julie E Dietze; Nicola Evans; Edward T Furlong; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Dale W Griffin; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Kathryn M Kuivila; Jason R Masoner; Carrie A McDonough; Michael T Meyer; James L Orlando; Mark J Strynar; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Re-evaluating the Significance of Estrone as an Environmental Estrogen.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; David Feifarek; Brett Blackwell; Jenna E Cavallin; Kathleen M Jensen; Michael D Kahl; Shane Poole; Eric Randolph; Travis Saari; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Genes Indicative of Zoonotic and Swine Pathogens Are Persistent in Stream Water and Sediment following a Swine Manure Spill.

Authors:  Sheridan K Haack; Joseph W Duris; Dana W Kolpin; Lisa R Fogarty; Heather E Johnson; Kristen E Gibson; Michael Focazio; Kellogg J Schwab; Laura E Hubbard; William T Foreman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Estrogenic effects in the influents and effluents of the drinking water treatment plants.

Authors:  Yan-You Gou; Susana Lin; Danielle E Que; Lemmuel L Tayo; Ding-Yan Lin; Kuan-Chung Chen; Fu-An Chen; Pen-Chi Chiang; Gen-Shuh Wang; Yi-Chyuan Hsu; Kuo Pin Chuang; Chun-Yu Chuang; Tsui-Chun Tsou; How-Ran Chao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.