Literature DB >> 23623224

Current use and surgical efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy in colon cancer.

Robert P Sticca1, Steven R Alberts, Michelle R Mahoney, Daniel J Sargent, Lisa M Finstuen, Garth D Nelson, Timothy M Husted, Jan Franko, Charles D Goldman, Barbara A Pockaj.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Therapy trial demonstrated that laparoscopic colectomy (LC) was equivalent to open colectomy (OC) for 30-day mortality, time to recurrence, and overall survival in colon cancer (CC) patients. Current use of LC for CC is not well known. STUDY
DESIGN: Surgical data were reviewed for all patients randomized into a national phase III clinical trial for adjuvant therapy in stage III CC (North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial N0147). Colon resections were grouped as open (traditional laparotomy) or laparoscopic, including laparoscopic; laparoscopic assisted; hand assisted; and laparoscopic converted to OC. Statistical methods included nonparametric methods, categorical analysis, and logistic regression modeling.
RESULTS: A total of 3,393 evaluable patients were accrued between 2004 and 2009; 53% were male, median age was 58 years, 86% were white, and 70% had a body mass index >25 kg/m(2). Two thousand one hundred thirteen (62%) underwent OC. One thousand two hundred eighty (38%) were initiated as laparoscopic procedures, 25% (n = 322) were laparoscopic, 32% (n = 410) were laparoscopic assisted, 26% (n = 339) were hand assisted, and 16% (n = 209) were LC converted to OC. Significant predictors of LC (vs OC) in multivariate models were T stage (T1 or T2 vs T3 or T4; p = 0.0286), and absence of perforation, bowel obstruction, or adherence to surrounding organs (p < 0.01 each). Increasing rates of LC were observed over time, with LC eclipsing OC in 2009 (p < 0.0001). Surgical efficacy, measured by lymph node retrieval, was similar, with the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved higher in the LC group (20.6 vs 19.5 nodes; p = 0.0006).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a steadily increasing use of LC for the surgical treatment of CC between 2004 and 2009, with LC preferred by study completion. Surgical efficacy was similar in stage III CC patients.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623224      PMCID: PMC5623809          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  11 in total

1.  Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection.

Authors:  D L Fowler; S A White
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

Review 2.  Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy.

Authors:  P A Johnstone; D C Rohde; S E Swartz; J E Fetter; S D Wexner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem.

Authors:  W T Reilly; H Nelson; G Schroeder; H S Wieand; J Bolton; M J O'Connell
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  F J Berends; G Kazemier; H J Bonjer; J F Lange
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States before and after the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group trial.

Authors:  Jennifer D Rea; Molly M Cone; Brian S Diggs; Karen E Deveney; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.

Authors:  P Vukasin; A E Ortega; F L Greene; G D Steele; A J Simons; G J Anthone; L A Weston; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Christopher W Macomber; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; W Brian Sweeney; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Heena P Santry; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Uptake of elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer in Canada from 2004/05 to 2014/15: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  C Marius Hoogerboord; Adrian R Levy; Min Hu; Gordon Flowerdew; Geoffrey Porter
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-18

Review 4.  Comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials examining novel treatment advances in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  William Paul Skelton; Aaron J Franke; Atif Iqbal; Thomas J George
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-08

5.  The impact of laparoscopic converted to open colectomy on short-term and oncologic outcomes for colon cancer.

Authors:  Jian Li; Hui Guo; Xiao-Dong Guan; Chao-Nong Cai; Lu-Kun Yang; Yue-Chan Li; Yan-Hua Zhu; Pei-Ping Li; Xia-Lei Liu; Dong-Jie Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Geographic variation in use of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Kyle H Sheetz; Seth A Waits; Justin B Dimick; Scott E Regenbogen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xubing Zhang; Qingbin Wu; Chaoyang Gu; Tao Hu; Liang Bi; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.