BACKGROUND: Assessment of indoor allergen is valuable in exposure research and evaluation of allergic individuals. Collection methods range from grab vacuum samples to filtration devices located in the breathing range of an individual. For practical purposes, many research studies use analysis of collected house dust to evaluate allergen reservoirs. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that house dust collected from the family vacuum is equivalent to house dust collected by a technician following standard protocol. METHODS: Homes from a healthy homes demonstration project (n = 41) were sampled using a specific Department of Housing and Urban Development-suggested protocol in the bedroom of the child with asthma and a simple grab procedure from the family vacuum. Samples were evaluated for the presence of 5 allergens, Bla g2, Can f1, Der f1, and Der p1 combined as total mite, Fel d1, and Mus m1. Samples were also evaluated for total antigenic protein from 4 fungal taxa, including Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, and Penicillium. RESULTS: All of the allergens and antigens tested showed good correlation between the 2 collection methods. Fungal antigens ranged up to 92,651 nanograms per gram of dust for Aspergillus, and allergens ranged up to 17,928 nanograms per gram of dust for Can f1. The best correlation was for Cladosporium (r = 0.91), and the weakest was for dust mite (r = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Allergens and antigens tested from samples collected by protocol and by grab sampling from the home vacuum were highly positively correlated. Grab samples taken from the family vacuum may be a good surrogate for evaluating home allergen exposure.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of indoor allergen is valuable in exposure research and evaluation of allergic individuals. Collection methods range from grab vacuum samples to filtration devices located in the breathing range of an individual. For practical purposes, many research studies use analysis of collected house dust to evaluate allergen reservoirs. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that house dust collected from the family vacuum is equivalent to house dust collected by a technician following standard protocol. METHODS: Homes from a healthy homes demonstration project (n = 41) were sampled using a specific Department of Housing and Urban Development-suggested protocol in the bedroom of the child with asthma and a simple grab procedure from the family vacuum. Samples were evaluated for the presence of 5 allergens, Bla g2, Can f1, Der f1, and Der p1 combined as total mite, Fel d1, and Mus m1. Samples were also evaluated for total antigenic protein from 4 fungal taxa, including Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, and Penicillium. RESULTS: All of the allergens and antigens tested showed good correlation between the 2 collection methods. Fungal antigens ranged up to 92,651 nanograms per gram of dust for Aspergillus, and allergens ranged up to 17,928 nanograms per gram of dust for Can f1. The best correlation was for Cladosporium (r = 0.91), and the weakest was for dust mite (r = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Allergens and antigens tested from samples collected by protocol and by grab sampling from the home vacuum were highly positively correlated. Grab samples taken from the family vacuum may be a good surrogate for evaluating home allergen exposure.
Authors: R B Gore; E A Hadi; M Craven; F I Smillie; T J O'Meara; E R Tovey; A Woodcock; A Custovic Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Mary M O'Sullivan; Julie Brandfield; Sumedh S Hoskote; Shiri N Segal; Luis Chug; Ariel Modrykamien; Edward Eden Journal: J Asthma Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Wayne J Morgan; Ellen F Crain; Rebecca S Gruchalla; George T O'Connor; Meyer Kattan; Richard Evans; James Stout; George Malindzak; Ernestine Smartt; Marshall Plaut; Michelle Walter; Benjamin Vaughn; Herman Mitchell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jay Portnoy; Jeffrey D Miller; P Brock Williams; Ginger L Chew; J David Miller; Fares Zaitoun; Wanda Phipatanakul; Kevin Kennedy; Charles Barnes; Carl Grimes; Désirée Larenas-Linnemann; James Sublett; David Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; David Khan; David Lang; Richard Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Christopher Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon Spector; Stephen A Tilles; Dana Wallace Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Christina E Ciaccio; Anita C DiDonna; Kevin Kennedy; Charles S Barnes; Jay M Portnoy; Lanny J Rosenwasser Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Torie Grant; Ana M Rule; Kirsten Koehler; Robert A Wood; Elizabeth C Matsui Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.806
Authors: Ryan Allenbrand; Charles S Barnes; Mubeen Mohammed; Luke Gard; Freddy Pacheco; Kevin Kennedy; Anita DiDonna; Jay Portnoy; Chitra Dinakar Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Joseph A Pacheco; Christina M Pacheco; Charley Lewis; Chandler Williams; Charles Barnes; Lanny Rosenwasser; Won S Choi; Christine M Daley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mario Sánchez-Borges; Enrique Fernandez-Caldas; Wayne R Thomas; Martin D Chapman; Bee Wah Lee; Luis Caraballo; Nathalie Acevedo; Fook Tim Chew; Ignacio J Ansotegui; Leili Behrooz; Wanda Phipatanakul; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Demoly Pascal; Nelson Rosario; Motohiro Ebisawa; Mario Geller; Santiago Quirce; Susanne Vrtala; Rudolf Valenta; Markus Ollert; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Moises A Calderón; Charles S Barnes; Adnan Custovic; Suwat Benjaponpitak; Arnaldo Capriles-Hulett Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 4.084