Literature DB >> 23621762

DNA bending propensity in the presence of base mismatches: implications for DNA repair.

Monika Sharma1, Alexander V Predeus, Shayantani Mukherjee, Michael Feig.   

Abstract

DNA bending is believed to facilitate the initial recognition of the mismatched base for repair. The repair efficiencies are dependent on both the mismatch type and neighboring nucleotide sequence. We have studied bending of several DNA duplexes containing canonical matches: A:T and G:C; various mismatches: A:A, A:C, G:A, G:G, G:T, C:C, C:T, and T:T; and a bis-abasic site: X:X. Free-energy profiles were generated for DNA bending using umbrella sampling. The highest energetic cost associated with DNA bending is observed for canonical matches while bending free energies are lower in the presence of mismatches, with the lowest value for the abasic site. In all of the sequences, DNA duplexes bend toward the major groove with widening of the minor groove. For homoduplexes, DNA bending is observed to occur via smooth deformations, whereas for heteroduplexes, kinks are observed at the mismatch site during strong bending. In general, pyrimidine:pyrimidine mismatches are the most destabilizing, while purine:purine mismatches lead to intermediate destabilization, and purine:pyrimidine mismatches are the least destabilizing. The ease of bending is partially correlated with the binding affinity of MutS to the mismatch pairs and subsequent repair efficiencies, indicating that intrinsic DNA bending propensities are a key factor of mismatch recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23621762      PMCID: PMC3676302          DOI: 10.1021/jp403127a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  75 in total

1.  Nearest-neighbor thermodynamics and NMR of DNA sequences with internal A.A, C.C, G.G, and T.T mismatches.

Authors:  N Peyret; P A Seneviratne; H T Allawi; J SantaLucia
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Sequence-dependent dynamics of duplex DNA: the applicability of a dinucleotide model.

Authors:  T M Okonogi; S C Alley; A W Reese; P B Hopkins; B H Robinson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Base-flipping mechanism in postmismatch recognition by MutS.

Authors:  Sean M Law; Michael Feig
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  DNA dynamics: bubble 'n' flip for DNA cyclisation?

Authors:  Andrew Travers
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Kinking occurs during molecular dynamics simulations of small DNA minicircles.

Authors:  Filip Lankas; Richard Lavery; John H Maddocks
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Nearest-neighbor thermodynamics of internal A.C mismatches in DNA: sequence dependence and pH effects.

Authors:  H T Allawi; J SantaLucia
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The structure of guanosine-thymidine mismatches in B-DNA at 2.5-A resolution.

Authors:  W N Hunter; T Brown; G Kneale; N N Anand; D Rabinovich; O Kennard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A random-walk model for helix bending in B-DNA.

Authors:  R E Dickerson; M L Kopka; P Pjura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA.

Authors:  G Obmolova; C Ban; P Hsieh; W Yang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mechanism of mismatch recognition revealed by human MutSβ bound to unpaired DNA loops.

Authors:  Shikha Gupta; Martin Gellert; Wei Yang
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  21 in total

1.  Tolerance of DNA Mismatches in Dmc1 Recombinase-mediated DNA Strand Exchange.

Authors:  María V Borgogno; Mariela R Monti; Weixing Zhao; Patrick Sung; Carlos E Argaraña; Roberto J Pezza
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Differential mismatch recognition specificities of eukaryotic MutS homologs, MutSα and MutSβ.

Authors:  Monika Sharma; Alexander V Predeus; Nicholas Kovacs; Michael Feig
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The structural impact of DNA mismatches.

Authors:  Giulia Rossetti; Pablo D Dans; Irene Gomez-Pinto; Ivan Ivani; Carlos Gonzalez; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Supercoiling DNA Locates Mismatches.

Authors:  Andrew Dittmore; Sumitabha Brahmachari; Yasuharu Takagi; John F Marko; Keir C Neuman
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Base-Pair Mismatch Can Destabilize Small DNA Loops through Cooperative Kinking.

Authors:  Jiyoun Jeong; Harold D Kim
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Molecular Mechanisms of DNA Replication and Repair Machinery: Insights from Microscopic Simulations.

Authors:  Christopher Maffeo; Han-Yi Chou; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Adv Theory Simul       Date:  2019-02-12

7.  Lesion search and recognition by thymine DNA glycosylase revealed by single molecule imaging.

Authors:  Claudia N Buechner; Atanu Maiti; Alexander C Drohat; Ingrid Tessmer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Coarse-grained modelling of DNA plectoneme pinning in the presence of base-pair mismatches.

Authors:  Parth Rakesh Desai; Sumitabha Brahmachari; John F Marko; Siddhartha Das; Keir C Neuman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 19.160

9.  "Flexible hinge" dynamics in mismatched DNA revealed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Timour B Ten; Viktoriya Zvoda; Manas K Sarangi; Serguei V Kuznetsov; Anjum Ansari
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 1.560

10.  Cooperative recognition of T:T mismatch by echinomycin causes structural distortions in DNA duplex.

Authors:  Pei-Ching Wu; Shu-Ling Tzeng; Chung-Ke Chang; Ya-Fen Kao; Michael J Waring; Ming-Hon Hou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.