Literature DB >> 24896128

Differential mismatch recognition specificities of eukaryotic MutS homologs, MutSα and MutSβ.

Monika Sharma1, Alexander V Predeus1, Nicholas Kovacs1, Michael Feig2.   

Abstract

In eukaryotes, the recognition of the DNA postreplication errors and initiation of the mismatch repair is carried out by two MutS homologs: MutSα and MutSβ. MutSα recognizes base mismatches and 1 to 2 unpaired nucleotides whereas MutSβ recognizes longer insertion-deletion loops (IDLs) with 1 to 15 unpaired nucleotides as well as certain mismatches. Results from molecular dynamics simulations of native MutSβ:IDL-containing DNA and MutSα:mismatch DNA complexes as well as complexes with swapped DNA substrates provide mechanistic insight into how the differential substrate specificities are achieved by MutSα and MutSβ, respectively. Our simulations results suggest more extensive interactions between MutSβ and IDL-DNA and between MutSα and mismatch-containing DNA that suggest corresponding differences in stability. Furthermore, our simulations suggest more expanded mechanistic details involving a different degree of bending when DNA is bound to either MutSα or MutSβ and a more likely opening of the clamp domains when noncognate substrates are bound. The simulation results also provide detailed information on key residues in MutSβ and MutSα that are likely involved in recognizing IDL-DNA and mismatch-containing DNA, respectively.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24896128      PMCID: PMC4052273          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  25 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of point mutations in mismatch repair genes that destabilize microsatellites in yeast.

Authors:  E A Sia; M Dominska; L Stefanovic; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Conformations of an adenine bulge in a DNA octamer and its influence on DNA structure from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  M Feig; M Zacharias; B M Pettitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling.

Authors:  András Fiser; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels.

Authors:  R B Russell; G J Barton
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1992-10

5.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology.

Authors:  Michael Feig; John Karanicolas; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  HNPCC-like cancer predisposition in mice through simultaneous loss of Msh3 and Msh6 mismatch-repair protein functions.

Authors:  N de Wind; M Dekker; N Claij; L Jansen; Y van Klink; M Radman; G Riggins; M van der Valk; K van't Wout; H te Riele
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.

Authors:  A Sali; T L Blundell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Functional studies and homology modeling of Msh2-Msh3 predict that mispair recognition involves DNA bending and strand separation.

Authors:  Jill M Dowen; Christopher D Putnam; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Structures of Escherichia coli DNA mismatch repair enzyme MutS in complex with different mismatches: a common recognition mode for diverse substrates.

Authors:  Ganesh Natrajan; Meindert H Lamers; Jacqueline H Enzlin; Herrie H K Winterwerp; Anastassis Perrakis; Titia K Sixma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Molecular Mechanisms of DNA Replication and Repair Machinery: Insights from Microscopic Simulations.

Authors:  Christopher Maffeo; Han-Yi Chou; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Adv Theory Simul       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 2.  Recent advances in transferable coarse-grained modeling of proteins.

Authors:  Parimal Kar; Michael Feig
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.507

3.  Hybrid All-Atom/Coarse-Grained Simulations of Proteins by Direct Coupling of CHARMM and PRIMO Force Fields.

Authors:  Parimal Kar; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Long-Range Signaling in MutS and MSH Homologs via Switching of Dynamic Communication Pathways.

Authors:  Beibei Wang; Joshua Francis; Monika Sharma; Sean M Law; Alexander V Predeus; Michael Feig
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Mismatch repair enzyme expression in primary and castrate resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Belinda Nghiem; Xiaotun Zhang; Hung-Ming Lam; Lawrence D True; Ilsa Coleman; Celestia S Higano; Peter S Nelson; Colin C Pritchard; Colm Morrissey
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-09-12

6.  An Msh3 ATPase domain mutation has no effect on MMR function.

Authors:  Yasmin Edwards
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-11-25

7.  Distinct DNA repair pathways cause genomic instability at alternative DNA structures.

Authors:  Jennifer A McKinney; Guliang Wang; Anirban Mukherjee; Laura Christensen; Sai H Sankara Subramanian; Junhua Zhao; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of tumour microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of response to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil Aggarwal; Alberto Quaglia; Mark J W McPhail; Kevin J Monahan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage and Repair: Capitalizing on Our Understanding of the Mechanisms of Maintaining Genomic Integrity for Therapeutic Purposes.

Authors:  Jolene Michelle Helena; Anna Margaretha Joubert; Simone Grobbelaar; Elsie Magdalena Nolte; Marcel Nel; Michael Sean Pepper; Magdalena Coetzee; Anne Elisabeth Mercier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variants in Sporadic Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Fabian Caja; Ludmila Vodickova; Jan Kral; Veronika Vymetalkova; Alessio Naccarati; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.