A Baillot1, M Asselin, E Comeau, A Méziat-Burdin, M-F Langlois. 1. Étienne-LeBel Clinical Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1H 5N4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over 70% of people who undergo bariatric surgery (BS) develop excess skin (ES). The physical and psychosocial consequences of ES may become a barrier to the practice of physical activity (PA), which is highly recommended to optimize the results of BS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ES on the practice of PA in women who have undergone BS. METHODS: Questionnaires administered to 26 women having undergone BS 2 ± 0.2 years before (BMI = 29.1 ± 0.8 kg/m2) evaluated the impacts of ES, the practice of PA, physical self-perception, and physical exercise beliefs. We also used the 6-min walking test and muscular endurance tests to evaluate physical fitness and photographs with anatomical markers to quantify ES. RESULTS: Of the women, 76.9% declared mobility limitations due to ES during the practice of PA and 45.2% stated avoiding PA because of ES which caused flapping and unwelcome stares from others. The women who stated that they avoided PA because of ES had significantly lower physical self-perception and physical fitness and reported experiencing more embarrassment during PA despite no significant difference in the magnitude of ES (p = 0.06), BMI, daily life inconveniences, and energy expenditure compared to those women who did not avoid PA. CONCLUSION: Although ES after BS is a barrier to the practice of PA for some women, it does not in itself prevent the regular practice of PA. The main reason women with ES avoid PA seems to have less to do with the magnitude of ES itself and more with psychosocial inconveniences.
BACKGROUND: Over 70% of people who undergo bariatric surgery (BS) develop excess skin (ES). The physical and psychosocial consequences of ES may become a barrier to the practice of physical activity (PA), which is highly recommended to optimize the results of BS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ES on the practice of PA in women who have undergone BS. METHODS: Questionnaires administered to 26 women having undergone BS 2 ± 0.2 years before (BMI = 29.1 ± 0.8 kg/m2) evaluated the impacts of ES, the practice of PA, physical self-perception, and physical exercise beliefs. We also used the 6-min walking test and muscular endurance tests to evaluate physical fitness and photographs with anatomical markers to quantify ES. RESULTS: Of the women, 76.9% declared mobility limitations due to ES during the practice of PA and 45.2% stated avoiding PA because of ES which caused flapping and unwelcome stares from others. The women who stated that they avoided PA because of ES had significantly lower physical self-perception and physical fitness and reported experiencing more embarrassment during PA despite no significant difference in the magnitude of ES (p = 0.06), BMI, daily life inconveniences, and energy expenditure compared to those women who did not avoid PA. CONCLUSION: Although ES after BS is a barrier to the practice of PA for some women, it does not in itself prevent the regular practice of PA. The main reason women with ES avoid PA seems to have less to do with the magnitude of ES itself and more with psychosocial inconveniences.
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martin Iglesias; Patricia Butron; Leonardo Abarca; Mario F Perez-Monzo; Beatriz de Rienzo-Madero Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Paul M Coen; Charles J Tanner; Nicole L Helbling; Gabriel S Dubis; Kazanna C Hames; Hui Xie; George M Eid; Maja Stefanovic-Racic; Frederico G S Toledo; John M Jakicic; Joseph A Houmard; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Sofia Ramalho; Ana Pinto Bastos; Cátia Silva; Ana Rita Vaz; Isabel Brandão; Paulo P P Machado; Eva Conceição Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Claire E E de Vries; Lisa van den Berg; Valerie M Monpellier; Maarten M Hoogbergen; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Steve M M de Castro; Berend van der Lei Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-06-24
Authors: Merle Bartsch; Svenja Langenberg; Kerstin Gruner-Labitzke; Mareike Schulze; Hinrich Köhler; Ross D Crosby; Michael Marschollek; Martina de Zwaan; Astrid Müller Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: S Christopher Derderian; Luke Patten; Alexander M Kaizer; Thomas H Inge; Todd M Jenkins; Marc P Michalsky; Changchun Xie; Lindel C Dewberry; Thomas J Sitzman Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.734